Categories: Science

EPA Fighting Hard to Stop Mountaintop Mining


Surface mining in the Appalachian Mountains is polluting waterways and killing wildlife, says the Environmental Protection Agency. Photo by M. Tama/Getty

The US Environmental Protection Agency is currently fighting hard to stop the destructive mining practices that threaten aquatic habitats and the wildlife of the Appalachian Mountains of West Virginia.

Mountaintop mining involves removing vast amounts of earth with explosives so that thin seams of coal can be excavated. Last year, the EPA vetoed a permit for one of the largest projects like this in West Virginia. The permit had been awarded by the US Army Corps of Engineers to Mingo Logan, a subsidiary of Arch Coal in 2007. The company is the second-largest coal producer in the USA and is based in St Louis, Missouri. The EPA concluded that the Spruce 1 mine would have unacceptable effects on the water quality and wildlife in the region.

In March of this year, US district judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that the EPA didn’t have the authority to veto a permit once it had been issued. Such an authority would give the agency stunning power, she stated whereas environmentalists fear that the move will seriously threaten the EPA’s powers to effectively safeguard the wildlife. In July, another judge overruled the EPA guidance that recommended preserving water quality by putting limits on the allowed electrical conductivity of stream water, a property which is increased by the presence of mining debris in water.

The EPA will submit documents to appeal these decisions. The EPA and Earthjustice argue that the law clearly states that the EPA has the power to revoke permits. They also argue that the negative impacts of surface mining on sensitive habitats and wildlife has been clearly demonstrated by scientific evidence. Recent studies1, 2, 3 seem to strengthen their case, suggesting that mountaintop rubble dumped in valleys buries streams and causes selenium, as well as other metals, to leak into the water.

This mine will create a complex chemical mix, and will lead to the loss of sensitive taxa, states Emily Bernhardt, a biologist at Duke University. However, mining companies continue to question the scientific evidence. Mingo Logan states that the impacts of mining on large invertebrates and salamanders are “utterly routine” and that the effects on fish by the EPA are highly “speculative.”

[via Nature]


Recent Posts

New Banana-Derived Therapy Is Effective Against All Known Coronaviruses and Flu Strains

The potential therapy was derived from a banana protein. A study published on January 13th,…

November 29, 2022

New Report: Earth Is “Unequivocally” in Midst of Climate Emergency

16 of the 35 planetary vital indicators used by the researchers to measure climate change…

November 29, 2022

20 Times More Intense: New Material Will Help Improve Phone and Television Displays

Researchers have created fluorophores between 2.4 and 20 times more intense than analogs. Scientists have…

November 29, 2022

At Risk for Diabetes? Scientists Recommend Doing This

A new study recommends cutting carbs.  Although low-carb diets are often recommended for individuals who…

November 29, 2022

NASA Assesses Launch Pad for Damage After Launch of the World’s Most Powerful Rocket

Following the successful Artemis I liftoff of the world’s most powerful rocket from NASA’s Kennedy…

November 29, 2022

History-Making Event: Orion Goes the (Max) Distance – 268,563 Miles From Earth

NASA Artemis I — Flight Day 13: Orion Goes the (Max) Distance Just after 3…

November 29, 2022