Mars InSight Lander Yields a Year of Surprising Discoveries Above and Below the Surface of the Red Planet

In this artist’s concept of NASA’s InSight lander on Mars, layers of the planet’s subsurface can be seen below and dust devils can be seen in the background. Credit: IPGP/Nicolas Sarter

A batch of new papers summarizes the lander’s findings above and below the surface of the Red Planet.

A new understanding of Mars is beginning to emerge, thanks to the first year of NASA’s InSight lander mission. Findings described in a set of six papers published today reveal a planet alive with quakes, dust devils and strange magnetic pulses.

Five of the papers were published in Nature. An additional paper in Nature Geoscience details the InSight spacecraft’s landing site, a shallow crater nicknamed “Homestead hollow” in a region called Elysium Planitia.

InSight is the first mission dedicated to looking deep beneath the Martian surface. Among its science tools are a seismometer for detecting quakes, sensors for gauging wind and air pressure, a magnetometer, and a heat flow probe designed to take the planet’s temperature.

The two largest quakes detected by NASA’s InSight appear to have originated in a region of Mars called Cerberus Fossae. Scientists previously spotted signs of tectonic activity here, including landslides. This image was taken by the HiRISE camera on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona

While the team continues to work on getting the probe into the Martian surface as intended, the ultra-sensitive seismometer, called the Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS), has enabled scientists to “hear” multiple trembling events from hundreds to thousands of miles away.

Seismic waves are affected by the materials they move through, giving scientists a way to study the composition of the planet’s inner structure. Mars can help the team better understand how all rocky planets, including Earth, first formed.


Mars trembles more often — but also more mildly — than expected. SEIS has found more than 450 seismic signals to date, the vast majority of which are probably quakes (as opposed to data noise created by environmental factors, like wind). The largest quake was about magnitude 4.0 in size — not quite large enough to travel down below the crust into the planet’s lower mantle and core. Those are “the juiciest parts of the apple” when it comes to studying the planet’s inner structure, said Bruce Banerdt, InSight principal investigator at JPL.

Scientists are ready for more: It took months after InSight’s landing in November 2018 before they recorded the first seismic event. By the end of 2019, SEIS was detecting about two seismic signals a day, suggesting that InSight just happened to touch down at a particularly quiet time. Scientists still have their fingers crossed for “the Big One.”

A cutaway view of Mars showing the InSight lander studying seismic activity. Credit: J.T. Keane/Nature Geoscience

Mars doesn’t have tectonic plates like Earth, but it does have volcanically active regions that can cause rumbles. A pair of quakes was strongly linked to one such region, Cerberus Fossae, where scientists see boulders that may have been shaken down cliffsides. Ancient floods there carved channels (see image below) nearly 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) long. Lava flows then seeped into those channels within the past 10 million years — the blink of an eye in geologic time.

Some of these young lava flows show signs of having been fractured by quakes less than 2 million years ago. “It’s just about the youngest tectonic feature on the planet,” said planetary geologist Matt Golombek of JPL. “The fact that we’re seeing evidence of shaking in this region isn’t a surprise, but it’s very cool.”

At the Surface

Billions of years ago, Mars had a magnetic field. It is no longer present, but it left ghosts behind, magnetizing ancient rocks that are now between 200 feet (61 meters) to several miles below ground. InSight is equipped with a magnetometer — the first on the surface of Mars to detect magnetic signals.

The magnetometer has found that the signals at Homestead hollow are 10 times stronger than what was predicted based on data from orbiting spacecraft that study the area. The measurements of these orbiters are averaged over a couple of hundred miles, whereas InSight’s measurements are more local.

The linearity of the volcanic vent shown in this image observed by NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, in conjunction with evidence of lava flow from the vent, suggests control by combined volcano-tectonic processes. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Arizona

Because most surface rocks at InSight’s location are too young to have been magnetized by the planet’s former field, “this magnetism must be coming from ancient rocks underground,” said Catherine Johnson, a planetary scientist at the University of British Columbia and the Planetary Science Institute. “We’re combining these data with what we know from seismology and geology to understand the magnetized layers below InSight. How strong or deep would they have to be for us to detect this field?”

In addition, scientists are intrigued by how these signals change over time. The measurements vary by day and night; they also tend to pulse around midnight. Theories are still being formed as to what causes such changes, but one possibility is that they’re related to the solar wind interacting with the Martian atmosphere.

In the Wind

InSight measures wind speed, direction and air pressure nearly continuously, offering more data than previous landed missions. The spacecraft’s weather sensors have detected thousands of passing whirlwinds, which are called dust devils when they pick up grit and become visible. “This site has more whirlwinds than any other place we’ve landed on Mars while carrying weather sensors,” said Aymeric Spiga, an atmospheric scientist at Sorbonne University in Paris.

Despite all that activity and frequent imaging, InSight’s cameras have yet to see dust devils. But SEIS can feel these whirlwinds pulling on the surface like a giant vacuum cleaner. “Whirlwinds are perfect for subsurface seismic exploration,” said Philippe Lognonné of Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), principal investigator of SEIS.

Still to Come: The Core

InSight has two radios: one for regularly sending and receiving data, and a more powerful radio designed to measure the “wobble” of Mars as it spins. This X-band radio, also known as the Rotation and Interior Structure Experiment (RISE), can eventually reveal whether the planet’s core is solid or liquid. A solid core would cause Mars to wobble less than a liquid one would.

This first year of data is just a start. Watching over a full Martian year (two Earth years) will give scientists a much better idea of the size and speed of the planet’s wobble.

InSight Research Papers

“Initial results from the InSight mission on Mars” by W. Bruce Banerdt, Suzanne E. Smrekar, Don Banfield, Domenico Giardini, Matthew Golombek, Catherine L. Johnson, Philippe Lognonné, Aymeric Spiga, Tilman Spohn, Clément Perrin, Simon C. Stähler, Daniele Antonangeli, Sami Asmar, Caroline Beghein, Neil Bowles, Ebru Bozdag, Peter Chi, Ulrich Christensen, John Clinton, Gareth S. Collins, Ingrid Daubar, Véronique Dehant, Mélanie Drilleau, Matthew Fillingim, William Folkner, Raphaël F. Garcia, Jim Garvin, John Grant, Matthias Grott, Jerzy Grygorczuk, Troy Hudson, Jessica C. E. Irving, Günter Kargl, Taichi Kawamura, Sharon Kedar, Scott King, Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun, Martin Knapmeyer, Mark Lemmon, Ralph Lorenz, Justin N. Maki, Ludovic Margerin, Scott M. McLennan, Chloe Michaut, David Mimoun, Anna Mittelholz, Antoine Mocquet, Paul Morgan, Nils T. Mueller, Naomi Murdoch, Seiichi Nagihara, Claire Newman, Francis Nimmo, Mark Panning, W. Thomas Pike, Ana-Catalina Plesa, Sébastien Rodriguez, Jose Antonio Rodriguez-Manfredi, Christopher T. Russell, Nicholas Schmerr, Matt Siegler, Sabine Stanley, Eléanore Stutzmann, Nicholas Teanby, Jeroen Tromp, Martin van Driel, Nicholas Warner, Renee Weber and Mark Wieczorek, 24 February 2020, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0544-y

“Crustal and time-varying magnetic fields at the InSight landing site on Mars” by Catherine L. Johnson, Anna Mittelholz, Benoit Langlais, Christopher T. Russell, Véronique Ansan, Don Banfield, Peter J. Chi, Matthew O. Fillingim, Francois Forget, Heidi Fuqua Haviland, Matthew Golombek, Steve Joy, Philippe Lognonné, Xinping Liu, Chloé Michaut, Lu Pan, Cathy Quantin-Nataf, Aymeric Spiga, Sabine Stanley, Shea N. Thorne, Mark A. Wieczorek, Yanan Yu, Suzanne E. Smrekar and William B. Banerdt, 24 February 2020, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0537-x

“The atmosphere of Mars as observed by InSight” by Don Banfield, Aymeric Spiga, Claire Newman, François Forget, Mark Lemmon, Ralph Lorenz, Naomi Murdoch, Daniel Viudez-Moreiras, Jorge Pla-Garcia, Raphaël F. Garcia, Philippe Lognonné, Özgür Karatekin, Clément Perrin, Léo Martire, Nicholas Teanby, Bart Van Hove, Justin N. Maki, Balthasar Kenda, Nils T. Mueller, Sébastien Rodriguez, Taichi Kawamura, John B. McClean, Alexander E. Stott, Constantinos Charalambous, Ehouarn Millour, Catherine L. Johnson, Anna Mittelholz, Anni Määttänen, Stephen R. Lewis, John Clinton, Simon C. Stähler, Savas Ceylan, Domenico Giardini, Tristram Warren, William T. Pike, Ingrid Daubar, Matthew Golombek, Lucie Rolland, Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig, David Mimoun, Éric Beucler, Alice Jacob, Antoine Lucas, Mariah Baker, Véronique Ansan, Kenneth Hurst, Luis Mora-Sotomayor, Sara Navarro, Josefina Torres, Alain Lepinette, Antonio Molina, Mercedes Marin-Jimenez, Javier Gomez-Elvira, Veronica Peinado, Jose-Antonio Rodriguez-Manfredi, Brian T. Carcich, Stephen Sackett, Christopher T. Russell, Tilman Spohn, Suzanne E. Smrekar and W. Bruce Banerdt, 24 February 2020, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0534-0

“The seismicity of Mars” by D. Giardini, P. Lognonné, W. B. Banerdt, W. T. Pike, U. Christensen, S. Ceylan, J. F. Clinton, M. van Driel, S. C. Stähler, M. Böse, R. F. Garcia, A. Khan, M. Panning, C. Perrin, D. Banfield, E. Beucler, C. Charalambous, F. Euchner, A. Horleston, A. Jacob, T. Kawamura, S. Kedar, G. Mainsant, J.-R. Scholz, S. E. Smrekar, A. Spiga, C. Agard, D. Antonangeli, S. Barkaoui, E. Barrett, P. Combes, V. Conejero, I. Daubar, M. Drilleau, C. Ferrier, T. Gabsi, T. Gudkova, K. Hurst, F. Karakostas, S. King, M. Knapmeyer, B. Knapmeyer-Endrun, R. Llorca-Cejudo, A. Lucas, L. Luno, L. Margerin, J. B. McClean, D. Mimoun, N. Murdoch, F. Nimmo, M. Nonon, C. Pardo, A. Rivoldini, J. A. Rodriguez Manfredi, H. Samuel, M. Schimmel, A. E. Stott, E. Stutzmann, N. Teanby, T. Warren, R. C. Weber, M. Wieczorek and C. Yana, 24 February 2020, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0539-8

“Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data” by P. Lognonné, W. B. Banerdt, W. T. Pike, D. Giardini, U. Christensen, R. F. Garcia, T. Kawamura, S. Kedar, B. Knapmeyer-Endrun, L. Margerin, F. Nimmo, M. Panning, B. Tauzin, J.-R. Scholz, D. Antonangeli, S. Barkaoui, E. Beucler, F. Bissig, N. Brinkman, M. Calvet, S. Ceylan, C. Charalambous, P. Davis, M. van Driel, M. Drilleau, L. Fayon, R. Joshi, B. Kenda, A. Khan, M. Knapmeyer, V. Lekic, J. McClean, D. Mimoun, N. Murdoch, L. Pan, C. Perrin, B. Pinot, L. Pou, S. Menina, S. Rodriguez, C. Schmelzbach, N. Schmerr, D. Sollberger, A. Spiga, S. Stähler, A. Stott, E. Stutzmann, S. Tharimena, R. Widmer-Schnidrig, F. Andersson, V. Ansan, C. Beghein, M. Böse, E. Bozdag, J. Clinton, I. Daubar, P. Delage, N. Fuji, M. Golombek, M. Grott, A. Horleston, K. Hurst, J. Irving, A. Jacob, J. Knollenberg, S. Krasner, C. Krause, R. Lorenz, C. Michaut, R. Myhill, T. Nissen-Meyer, J. ten Pierick, A.-C. Plesa, C. Quantin-Nataf, J. Robertsson, L. Rochas, M. Schimmel, S. Smrekar, T. Spohn, N. Teanby, J. Tromp, J. Vallade, N. Verdier, C. Vrettos, R. Weber, D. Banfield, E. Barrett, M. Bierwirth, S. Calcutt, N. Compaire, C.L. Johnson, D. Mance, F. Euchner, L. Kerjean, G. Mainsant, A. Mocquet, J. A Rodriguez Manfredi, G. Pont, P. Laudet, T. Nebut, S. de Raucourt, O. Robert, C. T. Russell, A. Sylvestre-Baron, S. Tillier, T. Warren, M. Wieczorek, C. Yana and P. Zweifel, 24 February 2020, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0536-y

About InSight

A division of Caltech in Pasadena, JPL manages InSight for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. InSight is part of NASA’s Discovery Program, managed by the agency’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Lockheed Martin Space in Denver built the InSight spacecraft, including its cruise stage and lander, and supports spacecraft operations for the mission.

A number of European partners, including France’s Centre National d’Études Spatiales (CNES), the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA), are supporting the InSight mission. CNES provided the Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) instrument to NASA, with the principal investigator at IPGP (Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris). Significant contributions for SEIS came from IPGP; the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (MPS) in Germany; the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) in Switzerland; Imperial College London and Oxford University in the United Kingdom; and JPL. DLR provided the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3) instrument, with significant contributions from the Space Research Center (CBK) of the Polish Academy of Sciences and Astronika in Poland. Spain’s Centro de Astrobiología (CAB) supplied the temperature and wind sensors.