Microbes That Feed on Hydrogen Living Beneath Glaciers – But Where Is the Hydrogen Coming From?

Eric Dunham Glacier

Montana State University graduate student Eric Dunham. Credit: MSU

Using years’ worth of data collected from ice-covered habitats all over the world, a Montana State University team has discovered new insights into the processes that support microbial life underneath ice sheets and glaciers, and the role those organisms play in perpetuating life through ice ages and, perhaps, in seemingly inhospitable environments on other planets.

Doctoral candidate Eric Dunham of MSU’s Department of Microbiology and Immunology in the College of Agriculture, along with mentor Eric Boyd, published their findings in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in December 2020. The work examines the ways water and microbes interact with the bedrock beneath glaciers, using samples of sediment taken from glacial sites in Canada and Iceland.

“We kept finding organisms in these systems that were supported by hydrogen gas,” said Boyd of the inspiration for the project. “It initially didn’t make sense, because we couldn’t figure out where that hydrogen gas was coming from under these glaciers.”

A team of researchers, including Boyd, later discovered that through a series of physical and chemical processes, hydrogen gas is produced as the silica-rich bedrock underneath glaciers is ground into tiny mineral particles by the weight of the ice on top of it. When those mineral particles combine with glacial meltwater, they let off hydrogen.

What became even more fascinating to Boyd and Dunham was that microbial communities under the glaciers could combine that hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to generate more organic matter, called biomass, through a process called chemosynthesis. Chemosynthesis is similar to how plants generate biomass from carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, although chemosynthesis does not require sunlight.

To learn more about what those chemosynthetic microbes were doing, Dunham used samples of sediment from the glaciers in Canada and Iceland. He grew samples of the living organisms found in the sediment in a laboratory, watching them over several months to see if they would continue to grow in the simulated environment.

“The organisms we were interested in rely on hydrogen gas as food to grow, and most are also anaerobes, meaning oxygen will kill them,” said Dunham, who is originally from Billings and is entering the final semester of his doctoral studies. “One of the most critical steps in preparing these experiments, and easily the most stressful element, was getting those samples into bottles and flushing out all the oxygen as quickly as possible, so I didn’t kill the organisms I was trying to study.”

Over months of preparing and observing the microbial cultures, Dunham found that not only was it possible to track the communities’ growth in the lab environment but also that the type of bedrock underlying a glacier influenced how much hydrogen gas was produced, which in turn led to the presence of microbial communities that were better adapted to metabolizing hydrogen. Samples taken from the Kötlujökull Glacier in Iceland, which sits atop basaltic bedrock, produced much more hydrogen gas than the samples from Robertson Glacier in Alberta, Canada, which has carbonate bedrock beneath it.

As they use that hydrogen gas to generate energy, said Boyd, the microbes also pull carbon dioxide out of the air to create biomass, replicate and grow. That ability to “fix” carbon is a critical climate regulation process, another similarity to photosynthesis in plants.

“Considering that glaciers and ice sheets cover about 10% of the Earth’s landmass today, and a much larger fraction at times in the planet’s past, microbial activities such as the ones Eric measured are likely to have had a major impact on Earth’s climate, both today and in the past,” said Boyd. “We’ve known for a while that microorganisms living beneath ice sheets or glaciers can fix carbon, but we never really understood how. What Eric’s pioneering work shows is that not only are these organisms completely self-sustainable in the sense that they can generate their own fixed carbon, they also don’t need sunlight to do it like the rest of the biosphere that we’re familiar with.”

Looking further afield at the other planets in our solar system, Boyd notes that two of the critical elements scientists look for when evaluating habitability are water and a source of energy. The newfound knowledge that self-sustaining microbial communities can flourish in icy environments through the generation of hydrogen gas is a critical step toward identifying potentially habitable environments on other planets.

“There’s lots of evidence for ice and glaciers on other planets,” he said. “Are they habitable? We don’t know. Could there be microbes living under ice sheets on planets with bedrock similar to those that Eric studied? Absolutely. There’s no reason to think otherwise.”

For Dunham, whose undergraduate and postbaccalaureate research focused on health sciences and virology before shifting to biogeochemistry, the most rewarding part of the new discovery is exploring how various Earth processes fit together and influence one another in ways that the scientific community is only beginning to unlock.

Reference: “Lithogenic hydrogen supports microbial primary production in subglacial and proglacial environments” by Eric C. Dunham, John E. Dore, Mark L. Skidmore, Eric E. Roden and Eric S. Boyd, 21 December 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007051117

4 Comments on "Microbes That Feed on Hydrogen Living Beneath Glaciers – But Where Is the Hydrogen Coming From?"

  1. “That ability to “fix” carbon is a critical climate regulation process, …”

    If this were an honest social media forum, the above would be followed by,
    “This claim is disputed.”

  2. “Considering that glaciers and ice sheets cover about 10% of the Earth’s landmass today, and a much larger fraction at times in the planet’s past, microbial activities such as the ones Eric measured are likely to have had a MAJOR impact on Earth’s climate, both today and in the past,” …

    I don’t think that the expansive enthusiasm is warranted. First off, basaltic bedrock is not ubiquitous and not all glaciers have liquid water at their base. I suspect that, at the maximum thickness and areal coverage of the continental glaciations, liquid water was a lot rarer than what is observed today at the margins of melting glaciers. Furthermore, a thin film of microbes isn’t going to have the same volumetric carbon-fixing ability that a dense forest tens of feet high has, and that was replaced by ice.

    One of the problems with science today is what seems to be an almost desperate compulsion to make scientific findings somehow socially important. “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

  3. “… 426.8 ± 248.2 nM (n = 3)…”
    Most of those digits are meaningless! Basically, only the leading digit has any value, and it is actually uncertain by about 50%! The order of magnitude is established, but the measurement should be reported as 400 ± 200 nM. Just because the measuring instruments provide a precision of four significant figures doesn’t mean that they have any bearing on the accuracy or precision of the answer. Also, it should be stated clearly whether the range of uncertainty (± x.xx) is one sigma or two sigma, and not let the reader wonder.

  4. Maybe they are just appearing spontaneously out of the quantuum vacuum. Its just trapped under the ice. 🙂

Leave a Reply to Joe Milosch Cancel reply

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.