This artist’s rendition depicts NASA’s Mars 2020 rover studying a Mars rock outrcrop. The mission will not only seek out and study an area likely to have been habitable in the distant past, but it will take the next, bold step in robotic exploration of the Red Planet by seeking signs of past microbial life itself.
In just a couple of years, NASA’s newest rover will be flying to Mars. The Mars 2020 mission will use the next generation of science and landing technology to collect rock samples for possible return by a future mission.
At a glance, it looks a lot like its predecessor, the Curiosity Mars rover. But there’s no doubt it’s a souped-up science machine: It has seven new instruments, redesigned wheels and more autonomy. A drill will capture rock cores, while a caching system with a miniature robotic arm will seal up these samples. Then, they’ll be deposited on the Martian surface for possible pickup by a future mission.
This new hardware is being developed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, which manages the mission for the agency. It includes the Mars 2020 mission’s cruise stage, which will fly the rover through space, and the descent stage, a rocket-powered “sky crane” that will lower it to the planet’s surface. Both of these stages have recently moved into JPL’s Spacecraft Assembly Facility.
Mars 2020 relies heavily on the system designs and spare hardware previously created for Mars Science Laboratory’s Curiosity rover, which landed in 2012. Roughly 85 percent of the new rover’s mass is based on this “heritage hardware.”
This artist’s concept depicts NASA’s Mars 2020 rover exploring Mars.
“The fact that so much of the hardware has already been designed — or even already exists — is a major advantage for this mission,” said Jim Watzin, director of NASA’s Mars Exploration Program. “It saves us money, time and most of all, reduces risk.”
Despite its similarities to Mars Science Laboratory, the new mission has very different goals. Mars 2020’s instruments will seek signs of ancient life by studying terrain that is now inhospitable, but once held flowing rivers and lakes, more than 3.5 billion years ago.
To achieve these new goals, the rover has a suite of cutting-edge science instruments. It will seek out biosignatures on a microbial scale: An X-ray spectrometer will target spots as small as a grain of table salt, while an ultraviolet laser will detect the “glow” from excited rings of carbon atoms. A ground-penetrating radar will be the first instrument to look under the surface of Mars, mapping layers of rock, water and ice up to 30 feet (10 meters) deep, depending on the material.
The rover is getting some upgraded Curiosity hardware, including color cameras, a zoom lens and a laser that can vaporize rocks and soil to analyze their chemistry.
“Our next instruments will build on the success of MSL, which was a proving ground for new technology,” said George Tahu, NASA’s Mars 2020 program executive. “These will gather science data in ways that weren’t possible before.”
The mission will also undertake a marathon sample hunt: The rover team will try to drill at least 20 rock cores, and possibly as many as 30 or 40, for possible future return to Earth.
“Whether life ever existed beyond Earth is one of the grand questions humans seek to answer,” said Ken Farley of JPL, Mars 2020’s project scientist. “What we learn from the samples collected during this mission has the potential to address whether we’re alone in the universe.”
JPL is also developing a crucial new landing technology called terrain-relative navigation. As the descent stage approaches the Martian surface, it will use computer vision to compare the landscape with pre-loaded terrain maps. This technology will guide the descent stage to safe landing sites, correcting its course along the way.
A related technology called the range trigger will use location and velocity to determine when to fire the spacecraft’s parachute. That change will narrow the landing ellipse by more than 50 percent.
“Terrain-relative navigation enables us to go to sites that were ruled too risky for Curiosity to explore,” said Al Chen of JPL, the Mars 2020 entry, descent and landing lead. “The range trigger lets us land closer to areas of scientific interest, shaving miles — potentially as much as a year — off a rover’s journey.”
This approach to minimizing landing errors will be critical in guiding any future mission dedicated to retrieving the Mars 2020 samples, Chen said.
Site selection has been another milestone for the mission. In February, the science community narrowed the list of potential landing sites from eight to three. Those three remaining sites represent fundamentally different environments that could have harbored primitive life: an ancient lakebed called Jezero Crater; Northeast Syrtis, where warm waters may have chemically interacted with subsurface rocks; and a possible hot springs at Columbia Hills.
All three sites have rich geology and may potentially harbor signs of past microbial life. A final landing site decision is still more than a year away.
“In the coming years, the 2020 science team will be weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each of these sites,” Farley said. “It is by far the most important decision we have ahead of us.”
Ah yes, the age-old question, are we alone? Boy, that sure is a scary thought. There just has to be microbial life on another planet! Let’s spend trillions of taxpayer’s $$ to find out.
Let’s make a HUGE economy out of ‘Searching for life’ ‘out there’ somewhere, ‘to boldly go where no one has gone before’, etc, etc, – to the point where it takes on a ‘cash cow’-life of its own.
These are only a few of the brainwashing ‘catch phrases’ that are perpetually being used each day to keep the masses duped as to what our PRIORITIES as ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDS should really be.
The minds of the masses are continually manipulated with of this ‘Sci Fi’ fake physics. It’s been repeated over and over for so long, that it now appears to be true, with so-called CGI-filled ‘adventure space movies’ that makes it all the more believable.
It is obvious by watching this above video that there is a lot of $$ invested into only a THEORY, that there MUST be life ‘out there’, somewhere in time and space.
Do I, as a taxpayer, have any say-so as whether or not this is a good direction for 20+BILLION $$ of taxpayer money to go towards each year? Of course not.
Imagine if just ONE YEAR’s worth of NASA’s operating costs went towards cleaning up their TOXIC ROCKET LAUNCH LEGACY.
Is there a way given by the US GOVT to OPT OUT of supporting NASA with my tax dollars? Nope. Friendly fascism at its finest. “We are going to Mars, you’re going to pay for it.”
Though history will continue to repeat itself with military secret SDI space ops in disguise of ‘searching for e.t. life’ to keep the public duped, and the cash cow alive. Just follow the money trail.
In so doing, NASA’s environmental responsibilities to sustaining life here on Earth is shirked. If they were to do the right thing at the present time, i.e. clean up their half a CENTURY of pollution, caused by countless rocket launches, failures, PERCHLORATE disasters, they’d go bankrupt.
There’d be no Mars program. Instead, there would be a NASA CLEANUP program. They would be forced to support only what research is paid for, due to the shift in what is funded by taxpayers FINALLY being able to individually direct where their hard-earned $$ goes to support.
We all know that aint gonna happen.
So, on with the show! Sweep the dirt under the rug! And by all means, keep the ‘SEARCH-FOR-ET-LIFE’-hype going as long as you can!