Not Accurate Enough: Scientists Remeasure the Gravitational Constant

Abstract Space Time Gravity

Gravity is a fundamental interaction that causes anything with mass or energy to attract one other.

The Gravitational Constant

The gravitational constant G determines the intensity of gravity, the force that pulls the Earth in its orbit around the sun or causes apples to fall to the ground. It is a component of Isaac Newton’s law of universal gravitation, which was developed almost 300 years ago. The constant must be determined by experimentation since it cannot be mathematically calculated.

The value of G has been the subject of several tests throughout the years, but the scientific community remains unsatisfied with the result. In comparison to the values of all the other important natural constants, such as the speed of light in a vacuum, it is far less accurate.

Gravity is a very weak force that cannot be separated, which makes it incredibly challenging to measure. When you measure the gravity between two bodies, you also have to estimate the impact of all other bodies in the universe.

“The only option for resolving this situation is to measure the gravitational constant with as many different methods as possible,” explains Jürg Dual, a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering at ETH Zurich. He and his colleagues conducted a new experiment to redetermine the gravitational constant and have now published their work in the prestigious journal Nature Physics.

With this experimental set-up, ETH researchers succeeded in determining the gravitational constant in a new way. Credit: Juerg Dual / IMES / ETH Zurich

A novel experiment in an old fortress

Dual’s team set up their measurement equipment at the former Furggels fortress, which is located close to Pfäfers above Bad Ragaz, Switzerland, in order to exclude sources of interference as much as possible. Two beams hung in vacuum chambers make up the experimental setup. After the researchers set one vibrating, gravitational coupling caused the second beam to also exhibit minimal movement (in the picometer range – i.e., one trillionth of a meter). The researchers used laser equipment to measure the motion of the two beams, and by analyzing this dynamic effect, they were able to estimate the gravitational constant’s magnitude.

The value the researchers arrived at using this method is 2.2 percent higher than the current official value given by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. However, Dual acknowledges that the new value is subject to a great deal of uncertainty: “To obtain a reliable value, we still need to reduce this uncertainty by a considerable amount. We’re already in the process of taking measurements with a slightly modified experimental setup so that we can determine the constant G with even greater precision.” Initial results are available but haven’t yet been published. Still, Dual confirms that “we’re on the right track.”

The researchers run the experiment remotely from Zurich, which minimizes disruptions from personnel present on site. The team can view the measurement data in real-time whenever they choose.

Insight into the history of the universe

For Dual, the advantage of the new method is that it measures gravity dynamically via the moving beams. “In dynamic measurements, unlike static ones, it doesn’t matter that it’s impossible to isolate the gravitational effect of other bodies,” he says. That’s why he hopes that he and his team can use the experiment to help crack the gravity conundrum. Science has still not fully understood this natural force or the experiments that relate to it.

For example, a better understanding of gravity would allow us to better interpret gravitational wave signals. Such waves were detected for the first time in 2015 at the LIGO observatories in the US. They were the result of two orbiting black holes that had merged at a distance of about 1.3 billion light-years from Earth. Since then, scientists have documented dozens of such events; if they could be traced in detail, they would reveal new insights into the universe and its history.

A career-crowning achievement

Dual began working on methods to measure the gravitational constant in 1991, but at one point had put his work on hold. However, the observation of gravitational waves at LIGO gave it new momentum, and in 2018 he resumed his research. In 2019, the project team set up the laboratory in the Furggels fortress and began new experiments. In addition to the scientists from Dual’s group and a statistics professor, the project also involved infrastructure personnel such as cleanroom specialists, an electrical engineer, and a mechanic. “This experiment couldn’t have come together without years of team effort,” Dual says. He is becoming a professor emeritus at the end of July this year. “A successful experiment is a nice way to end my career,” he says.

Reference: “Dynamic measurement of gravitational coupling between resonating beams in the hertz regime” by Tobias Brack, Bernhard Zybach, Fadoua Balabdaoui, Stephan Kaufmann, Francesco Palmegiano, Jean-Claude Tomasina, Stefan Blunier, Donat Scheiwiller, Jonas Fankhauser, and Jürg Dual, 11 July 2022, Nature Physics.
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01642-8


View Comments

  • So, I call Bull, "The gravitational constant G must be determined by experimentation since it cannot be mathematically calculated." I use 4Pi^2/G x M(of the sun) = k, (with nasa define M(of the sun) as 1.988506238 x 10^30 kilograms, k = 2.976507252 x 10^-19, if you use 6.77 x 10^-11 and k = 2.97472331 x 10^-19 if you use 6.674 x 10^-11. the College Physics textbook by Serway and Faughn, has a Useful planetary data table 7.3 on Page 196 and the last column is the constant k, listed as 2.97,2.99,2.97,2.98,2.97,2.99,2.95, 2.99,2.96 for the nine planets mercury to pluto.

  • The calculation of gravitational force between two beams vibrating in vaccum forming a couple is too good to give an average relust for universal gravitational constant G.Here the system is so artificial,waits to seek natural background of gravitation.

  • Gravitation being a natural phenomena,can not produce good result from experimental set up of vibrating beam coupled with another.The system lacks to follow nature.

  • The result of the experiment for calculation of universal gravitational constant is fair,but due to an isolated system this has small deviation.

  • I might be wrong but isn't gravity just the magnetic pull of each body in space like the planets and stars something like to magnets pulling each other and if true I don't see the big fuss about gravity......sooo someone correct me if I'm to learn

    • Nope. While Magnetism and Gravity are both frequencies. Gravity the implosion result of an exploding frequency. While Magnetism is an induced frequency on a ferritic material. They will tell you that the moon is held in place by the Gravity of the Earth, but when I showed them that the moon is actually held in place by a specific zone created by the frequency generated by the Earth, they all agreed that I was correct. See ESA February 20, 2019.

  • The dynamic method of vibrating beams coupled togather is able to produce good result for universal gravitational constant G with some error in margin.

  • With certain erròr the dynamic method approches the value for G.ln this experimentation treatments are lacking with some view that is beyond the scope of present physics.

Recent Posts

Science Reveals: How Does a Breakup Impact Your Sense of Control?

The research examined how people's feelings of control changed following separation, divorce, or the death…

October 6, 2022

Webb, Hubble Team Up To Trace Interstellar Dust – “We Got More Than We Bargained For”

“We got more than we bargained for by combining data from NASA’s James Webb Space…

October 6, 2022

A Biological Difference – Exercise Affects Boys and Girls Differently

A recent study finds that body fat percentage and amount of physical activity in girls…

October 6, 2022

“Something Strange Is Going On” – Physicists Answer a Decades-Old Question

A Different Type of Chaos Physicists from the University of California, Santa Barbara, the University…

October 6, 2022

neuromaps: A One-Stop-Shop for Brain Maps

Software tool brings together multiple brain maps in one place. No one imaging mode can…

October 6, 2022

A Common Medicine Causes Hearing Loss – Scientists Finally Might Know Why

Researchers identify possible treatment targets to prevent antibiotic-induced hearing loss. Researchers at Indiana University School…

October 6, 2022