Earth

“Nuclear Niño” – Nuclear War Could Trigger Big El Niño and Decrease Seafood

Nuclear Niño

A ‘nuclear Niño’ in the equatorial Pacific Ocean is shown in simulated temperature changes (Celsius) just four months after a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia. Credit: Joshua Coupe

Unprecedented warming in equatorial Pacific Ocean could last up to seven years.

A nuclear war could trigger an unprecedented El Niño-like warming episode in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, slashing algal populations by 40 percent and likely lowering the fish catch, according to a Rutgers-led study.

The research, published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, shows that turning to the oceans for food if land-based farming fails after a nuclear war is unlikely to be a successful strategy – at least in the equatorial Pacific.

“In our computer simulations, we see a 40 percent reduction in phytoplankton (algae) biomass in the equatorial Pacific, which would likely have downstream effects on larger marine organisms that people eat,” said lead author Joshua Coupe, a post-doctoral research associate in the Department of Environmental Sciences in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences at Rutgers University–New Brunswick. “Previous research has shown that global cooling following a nuclear war could lead to crop failure on land, and our study shows we probably can’t rely on seafood to help feed people, at least in that area of the world.”

Scientists studied climate change in six nuclear war scenarios, focusing on the equatorial Pacific Ocean. The scenarios include a major conflict between the United States and Russia and five smaller wars between India and Pakistan. Such wars could ignite enormous fires that inject millions of tons of soot (black carbon) into the upper atmosphere, blocking sunlight and disrupting Earth’s climate.

With an Earth system model to simulate the six scenarios, the scientists showed that a large-scale nuclear war could trigger an unprecedented El Niño-like event lasting up to seven years. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation is the largest naturally occurring phenomenon that affects Pacific Ocean circulation, alternating between warm El Niño and cold La Niña events and profoundly influencing marine productivity and fisheries.

During a “nuclear Niño,” scientists found that precipitation over the Maritime Continent (the area between the Indian and Pacific oceans and surrounding seas) and equatorial Africa would be shut down, largely because of a cooler climate.

More importantly, a nuclear Niño would shut down upwelling of deeper, colder waters along the equator in the Pacific Ocean, reducing the upward movement of nutrients that phytoplankton – the base of the marine food web – need to survive. Moreover, the diminished sunlight after a nuclear war would drastically reduce photosynthesis, stressing and potentially killing many phytoplankton.

“Turning to the sea for food after a nuclear war that dramatically reduces crop production on land seems like it would be a good idea,” said co-author Alan Robock, a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers–New Brunswick. “But that would not be a reliable source of the protein we need, and we must prevent nuclear conflict if we want to safeguard our food and Earth’s environment.”

Reference: “Nuclear Niño response observed in simulations of nuclear war scenarios” by Joshua Coupe, Samantha Stevenson, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Tyler Rohr, Cheryl S. Harrison, Alan Robock, Holly Olivarez, Charles G. Bardeen and Owen B. Toon, 22 January 2021, Communications Earth & Environment.
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-00088-1

Scientists at the University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Colorado, Boulder; Australian Antarctic Partnership Program; University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley; and National Center for Atmospheric Research contributed to the study.

Funding: Open Philanthropy Project, National Science Foundation, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado State University

Share

View Comments

  • I think I would have bigger worries than fish if there was a nuclear war of any magnitude. I probably wouldn't eat anything, especially fish, after a nuclear war, without scanning it for radiation first.

Recent Posts

First Theorized 70 Years Ago – “Rippled Beta Sheet” Created for the First Time

University of California, Santa Cruz, scientists report the creation of three crystal structures of periodic…

October 3, 2022

Scientists Successfully Create Diamonds Out of Bottle Plastic

A research team utilizes laser flashes to replicate the interior of ice planets, which inspires…

October 3, 2022

Don’t Miss: Evenings With Giants, Mars Changes Course, and Meteors From Orion

What are some skywatching highlights in October 2022? Enjoy giant planets Jupiter and Saturn all…

October 3, 2022

Rewriting History – The First Full-Length Genomes for Homosporous Ferns

A new study reveals ferns' history of DNA hoarding and kleptomania. Ferns are infamous for…

October 3, 2022

New Research Could Change Our Understanding of Autism

Research on identifying facial emotional expressions may alter how we see autism. There is a…

October 3, 2022

Tremendous Potential – Vitamin K Found To Prevent Cell Death

Scientists discover a new function for a long-known molecule.  A team of researchers from Helmholtz…

October 3, 2022