Paradox of Quantum Forces in Nanodevices “Casimir Puzzle” Explained by Scientists

Paradox of Quantum Forces in Nanodevices

Scientists proposed a new approach to describe the interaction of metals with electromagnetic fluctuations. Credit: Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University

Researchers proposed a new approach to describe the interaction of metals with electromagnetic fluctuations (i.e., with random bursts of electric and magnetic fields).

Researchers from Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) proposed a new approach to describe the interaction of metals with electromagnetic fluctuations (i.e., with random bursts of electric and magnetic fields). The obtained results have great potential for application in both fundamental physics and for creating nanodevices for various purposes. The article was published in the International Journal European Physical Journal C.

The operation of microdevices used in modern technology is influenced by the Casimir force caused by electromagnetic fluctuations. This is the force of attraction acting between two surfaces in the vacuum. Such an interaction between electrically neutral bodies located at a distance of less than one micrometer was theoretically described in the middle of the 20th century by Academician Evgeny Lifshitz. In some cases, however, Lifshitz’s theory contradicted the experimental results. A mysterious paradox was discovered in the process of precise measurements of the Casimir forces in nanodevices.

“The predictions of the Lifshitz’s theory were in agreement with the measurement results only if the energy losses of conduction electrons in metals were not taken into account in calculations. These losses, however, do exist! It is common knowledge that electric current slightly heats the wire. In the literature, this situation is called the Casimir puzzle,” explains Galina Klimchitskaya, Professor of the Institute of Physics, Nanotechnology and Telecommunications, SPbPU.

The scientists of Polytechnic University were able to simultaneously take into account the energy losses of electrons in metals and to reach an agreement between the predictions of the Lifshitz theory and high-precision measurements of the Casimir force. A new approach, describing the interaction of metals with electromagnetic fluctuations, takes into account that there are two types of fluctuations: The real fluctuations (similar to the observed electromagnetic fields), and the so-called virtual fluctuations which cannot be directly observed (similar to the virtual particles that constitute the quantum vacuum).

“The proposed approach leads to approximately the same contribution of real fluctuations to the Casimir force, as the commonly used one, but significantly changes the contribution of virtual fluctuations. As a result, Lifshitz’s theory comes into agreement with experiment, while taking into account the energy losses of electrons in metals,” comments Vladimir Mostepanenko, Professor of the Institute of Physics, Nanotechnology and Telecommunications, SPbPU.

The published results refer to nonmagnetic metals. In the future, researchers plan to extend the results to materials with ferromagnetic properties. Thus, there will be an opportunity for reliable calculation and creation of more miniature nanodevices operated under the influence of the Casimir force.

Reference: “An alternative response to the off-shell quantum fluctuations: a step forward in resolution of the Casimir puzzle” by G. L. Klimchitskaya and V. M. Mostepanenko, 29 September 2020, European Physical Journal C.
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08465-y

2 Comments on "Paradox of Quantum Forces in Nanodevices “Casimir Puzzle” Explained by Scientists"

  1. robert gumpert | November 1, 2020 at 1:12 am | Reply

    Does this uniformly apply to amorphous and crystalline metals?

  2. Why not apply the vibrational energy to a diamond or quartz crystal structure designed to resonate like a bell and have electrodes conected inside structure like a battery and as it vibrates it can be tuned into resonant frequency feedback ocillation circuit putting out even a 1 % increase would double in a matter of nano seconds until saturation pointt

Leave a Reply to Random Graves Cancel reply

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.