Stanford Study Reveals Secrets to Sustainable Weight Loss: Behaviors and Biomarkers Exposed

Obesity Weight Loss Concept

Stanford Medicine researchers have discovered biomarkers that can predict an individual’s ability to lose weight and maintain weight loss long-term. These biomarkers include signatures from the gut microbiome, proteins made by the human body, and levels of exhaled carbon dioxide. The study found that the bacteria in the gut and the amounts of certain proteins the body produces can impact an individual’s ability to sustain weight loss. Additionally, the research found that some individuals lose more weight on low-fat diets while others have better results on low-carb diets.

A new analysis of data from a yearlong weight-loss study has identified behaviors and biomarkers that contribute to short- and long-term weight loss.

Strictly following a diet— either healthy low-carb or healthy low-fat — was what mattered for short-term weight loss during the first six months. But people who maintained long-term weight loss for a year ate the same number of calories as those who regained weight or who did not lose weight during the second six months.

So what explains this difference?

According to the study, the bacteria living in your gut and the amounts of certain proteins your body makes can affect your ability to sustain weight loss. And some people, it turns out, shed more pounds on low-fat diets while others did better on low-carb diets.

Stanford Medicine researchers have identified several biomarkers that predict how successful an individual will be at losing weight and keeping it off long-term. These biomarkers include signatures from the gut microbiome, proteins made by the human body, and levels of exhaled carbon dioxide. The researchers published their findings on December 13 in the journal Cell Reports Medicine.

“Weight loss is enigmatic and complicated, but we can predict from the outset with microbiome and metabolic biomarkers who will lose the most weight and who will keep it off,” said Michael Snyder, PhD, professor and chair of genetics and co-senior author on the paper.

Willpower does not drive weight loss

The data came from 609 participants who logged everything they ate for a year while following either a low-fat or low-carb diet made up of mostly high-quality, minimally processed foods. The researchers tracked participant exercise, how well they followed their diet, and the number of calories consumed.

The study showed that just cutting calories or exercising were not enough to sustain weight loss over a year. To try and understand why, the team turned their focus to biomarkers of metabolism.

“We found specific microbiome ecologies and amounts of proteins and enzymes at the beginning of the study period — before people started following the diet — that indicated whether they would be successful at losing weight and keeping it off,” said Dalia Perelman, research dietician and co-lead author on the paper.

Throughout the study, the researchers measured the ratio of inhaled oxygen to exhaled carbon dioxide, known as a respiratory quotient, which serves as a proxy for whether carbohydrates or fats are the body’s primary fuel. A lower ratio means the body burns more fat, while a higher ratio means it burns more carbohydrates. So, those who started the diet with a higher respiratory quotient lost more weight on a low-carb diet.

“There are people who can be eating very few calories but still sustain their weight because of how their bodies metabolize fuels. It is not for lack of will: It is just how their bodies work,” Perelman said.

In other words, if your body prefers carbs and you’re predominately eating fat, it will be much harder to metabolize and burn off those calories.

“If you are following a diet that worked for someone you know and it is not working for you, it might be that that specific diet is not as suited for you,” added Xiao Li, PhD, co-lead author of the paper, a former postdoctoral fellow at Stanford Medicine who is now at Case Western University.

For now, focus on nutrients

The predictive information gleaned from the gut microbiome, proteomic analysis, and respiratory quotient signatures is laying the foundation for personalized diets. Snyder said he thinks tracking amounts of certain gut microbe strains will be a way for people to determine which diets are best for weight loss.

We’re not there yet, so until then, according to the researchers, the focus should be on eating high-quality foods that are unprocessed and low in refined flours and sugar.

The research team identified specific nutrients that were correlated with weight loss during the first six months. Low-carb diets should be based on monounsaturated fats — such as those that come from avocados, rather than bacon — and high in vitamins K, C, and E. These vitamins are in vegetables, nuts, olives, and avocados. Low-fat diets should be high in fiber, such as is found in whole grains and beans, and avoid added sugars.

“Your mindset should be on what you can include in your diet instead of what you should exclude,” Perelman said. “Figure out how to eat more fiber, whether it is from beans, whole grains, nuts, or vegetables, instead of thinking you shouldn’t eat ice cream. Learn to cook and rely less on processed foods. If you pay attention to the quality of food in your diet, then you can forget about counting calories.”

Reference: “Distinct factors associated with short-term and long-term weight loss induced by low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet intervention” by Xiao Li, Dalia Perelman, Ariel K. Leong, Gabriela Fragiadakis, Christopher D. Gardner and Michael P. Snyder, 13 December 2022, Cell Reports Medicine.
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100870

Christopher Gardner, professor of medicine and co-senior author on the paper, also contributed to this work.

10 Comments on "Stanford Study Reveals Secrets to Sustainable Weight Loss: Behaviors and Biomarkers Exposed"

  1. How does this tie in with the recent Harvard research that found that where fat ended up was dependent upon the levels of Nitric oxide in the veins, which was also dependent upon the percentage of Brown Adipose fat tissue in the body? According to their research, high carbohydrate diets, especially in childhood determined low levels of brown adipose fat which was not enough to release sufficient quantities of NO from venous Endothelial cells.

  2. How do these 2 sections not contradict each other?

    A lower ratio means the body burns more fat, while a higher ratio means it burns more carbohydrates. So, those who started the diet with a higher respiratory quotient lost more weight on a low-carb diet.

    In other words, if your body prefers carbs and you’re predominately eating fat, it will be much harder to metabolize and burn off those calories.

    • Exactly! I read that passage three times trying to break it down in my head to make sense of it! I’m still confused by what they’re trying to say.

  3. Body w/ Lower Ratio = Burns Fats
    Body w/ Higher Ratio = Burns Carbs

    If Body w/ Higher Ratio is in a calorie reduced state with a majority of the fuel as Carbs, it will lose more weight bc it is being given the fuel it is efficiently designed to burn.

    If Body w/ Higher Ratio is in a calorie reduced state with a majority of the fuel as Fat, it will struggle to lose weight bc it is NOT being given the fuel it is efficiently designed to burn.

    Obviously someone couldn’t implement this without more data and individual testing so here’s my takeaway: If you are dieting and not seeing a response, perhaps change the carb to fat ratio.

    It also gives some comfort to know that bc a friend or family member did a particular diet and it was successful and you try it and fail, it doesn’t mean you did something wrong, it just means that diet may not have suited your particular biology. I think that is probably the biggest takeaway, especially for those who continually struggle despite their best efforts.

  4. I am trying to lose 40 lbs. And get slimmer. I also need to fix my legs, they are injured from a motorcycle accident.

  5. This research just supports poor diet and exercise habits. The body will burn the fuel that it has. The easiest fuel comes from sugar followed by other starches. When people diet and limit the easy fuel the body reacts by slowing the metabolism and waiting for you to eat sugar and carbs. Once you break that cycle it will burn stored fat. The most effective way to burn that fat is to exercise after 12 hrs fasting. Its not hard. I went from being overweight with a massive gut to 5% visceral body fat in 4 months.

    • Ted,
      Thanks for your comments, but you are a man & I am a woman. For what ever reason, I have observed over the years that men loose twice as fast & loose double the pounds than women do.

      I have tried all types of diets, some with better results that others, but eventually the weight has come back. I have never tried your system. I ready to try anything. I’ll your system. If it works for me, I’ll be grateful to you forever. 🙂

  6. I lost 31 pounds last year, and about 27 total inches (from 9 different measurement points) and have, thankfully, kept it off so far! May marks my full one-year anniversary. I’m 52 years old, female, 3 C-sections, hypothyroid with some whacked out hormones, and I still lost weight, fat,and inches. How? 1) Pray 2) Write down your weight and measurements every week or even every few days 3) I did cardio 3-4 times per week and weights once a week 4) My eating plan was low fat, low protein (nuts or seafood only), low-moderate carbs, HIGH nutrition like vitamins, antioxidants, phytonutrients from lots of fruits and vegetables– so basically, pescatarian (vegetarian plus a little seafood here and there). Hope this helps and best of luck to those of you struggling to lose weight! I was finally successful after 2 decades of struggling! If I can do it, so can you! Just keep at it and work with your doctor on what plan is best!

  7. Im keto and Stand still with my weight some weight came back over the holidays 8 pounds and would like to start Incorporating carbs !!carbohydrates !! Good ones of course but I’m so afraid I am insulin resistance 57 and my hormones are changing Very interested in doing a low carb what your thoughts

    • Carbohydrates aren’t bad for a person. Spinach? Carbs. Strawberries? Carbs. Broccoli? Carbs. Beans and whole grains are mostly carbs too. It’s processed “foods” that are the issue- sugar, flour, and oils. Look up what people in the blue zones eat- the places on the planet where people live the longest

Leave a Reply to Ted Cancel reply

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.