Two Sides of the Same Coin: Tiny Electrical Vortexes Bridge Gap Between Ferroelectric and Ferromagnetic Materials

Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Polarization Pattern

The image represents the 3D model of the polarization pattern in the ferroelectric PbTiO3 representing the cycloidal modulation of the vortex core. Credit: University of Warwick

University of Warwick physicists discover presence of a special ferroelectric texture that mirrors the spin crystal phase (checkerboard-like symmetry) in ferromagnets.

  • Ferromagnetic materials have a permanent magnetic field. Ferroelectric materials do the same with an electric field
  • Researchers suggest that at small enough scales, the characteristics of the two could be almost identical, although they are caused by very different physics
  • Both classes of material have uses in electronics, particularly data storage

Ferromagnetic materials have a self-generating magnetic field, ferroelectric materials generate their own electrical field. Although electric and magnetic fields are related, physics tells us that they are very different classes of material. Now the discovery by University of Warwick-led scientists of a complex electrical ‘vortex’-like pattern that mirrors its magnetic counterpart suggests that they could actually be two sides of the same coin.

Detailed in a new study for the journal Nature, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation, and the Royal Society, the results give the first evidence of a process in ferroelectric materials comparable to the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in ferromagnets. This particular interaction plays a pivotal role in stabilizing topological magnetic structures, such as skyrmions, and it might be crucial for potential new electronic technologies exploiting their electrical analogs.

Bulk ferroelectric crystals have been used for many years in a range of technologies including sonar, audio transducers, and actuators. All these technologies exploit the intrinsic electric dipoles and their inter-relationship between the material’s crystal structure and applied fields.

For this study, the scientists created a thin film of the ferroelectric lead titanate sandwiched between layers of the ferromagnet strontium ruthenate, each about 4 nanometers thick — only twice the thickness of a single strand of DNA.

While the atoms of the two materials form a single continuous crystal structure, in the ferroelectric lead titanate layer the electric polarisation would normally form multiple ‘domains’, like a honeycomb. These domains can only be observed using state-of-the-art transmission electron microscopy and x-ray scattering.

But when the University of Warwick team examined the structure of the combined layers, they saw that the domains in the lead titanate were a complex topological structure of lines of vortexes, spinning alternately in different directions.

Almost identical behavior has also been seen in ferromagnets where it is known to be generated by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMi).

Lead author Professor Marin Alexe of the University of Warwick Department of Physics said: “If you look at how these characteristics scale down, the difference between ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity becomes less and less important. It might be that they will merge at some point in one unique material. This could be artificial and combine very small ferromagnets and ferroelectrics to take advantage of these topological features. It’s very clear to me that we are at the tip of the iceberg as far as where this research is going to go.”

Co-author Dorin Rusu, a postgraduate student at the University of Warwick, said: “Realising that in ferroelectrics dipolar textures that mimic their magnetic counterpart to such a degree ensures further research into the fundamental physics that drives such similarities. This result is not a trivial matter when you consider the difference in the origin and strengths of the electric and magnetic fields.”

The existence of these vortexes had previously been theorized, but it took the use of cutting-edge transmission electron microscopes at the University of Warwick, as well as the use of synchrotrons at four other facilities, to accurately observe them. These techniques allowed the scientists to measure the position of every atom to a high degree of certainty.

Co-author Professor Ana Sanchez said: “Electron microscopy is a game-changing technique in understanding these topological structures. It is the key tool in revealing the ins and outs of these novel materials, using a subatomic beam of electrons to generate images of internal structure.”

Reference: “Ferroelectric incommensurate spin crystals” by Dorin Rusu, Jonathan J. P. Peters, Thomas P. A. Hase, James A. Gott, Gareth A. A. Nisbet, Jörg Strempfer, Daniel Haskel, Samuel D. Seddon, Richard Beanland, Ana M. Sanchez and Marin Alexe, 9 February 2022, Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04260-1

Co-author Professor Thomas Hase added: “Accessing high end facilities across UK, Europe and US has been critical for this particular research.”

2 Comments on "Two Sides of the Same Coin: Tiny Electrical Vortexes Bridge Gap Between Ferroelectric and Ferromagnetic Materials"

  1. … caw, caw, caw … modern physics…

  2. Sankaravelayudhan Nandakumar | February 16, 2022 at 2:45 am | Reply

    Now this information gives a clue on formation of emergence of Electra Star as equivalent to one of Magnatar at thecritical twin based oscillations at critical merger of ferromagnetic white dwarf that may merge in forming a mirror image as if comparable with fusion of binary stars forming exygen and cabon particles quite unexpectedly at the end of helium burning.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.