People endorse conspiracy theories due to complex combination of personality traits, motivations.
A new study suggests that belief in conspiracy theories is driven by certain personality traits and social motivations. Individuals who feel superior to others, exhibit paranoia or antagonism, or perceive social threats, are more likely to believe in such theories, while a need for control or closure doesn’t have as strong an influence.
People can be prone to believe in conspiracy theories due to a combination of personality traits and motivations, including relying strongly on their intuition, feeling a sense of antagonism and superiority toward others, and perceiving threats in their environment, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.
The results of the study paint a nuanced picture of what drives conspiracy theorists, according to lead author Shauna Bowes, a doctoral student in clinical psychology at Emory University.
“Conspiracy theorists are not all likely to be simple-minded, mentally unwell folks – a portrait which is routinely painted in popular culture,” said Bowes. “Instead, many turn to conspiracy theories to fulfill deprived motivational needs and make sense of distress and impairment.”
The research was published online in the journal Psychological Bulletin.
Previous research on what drives conspiracy theorists had mostly looked separately at personality and motivation, according to Bowes. The current study aimed to examine these factors together to arrive at a more unified account of why people believe in conspiracy theories.
To do so, the researchers analyzed data from 170 studies involving over 158,000 participants, mainly from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Poland. They focused on studies that measured participants’ motivations or personality traits associated with conspiratorial thinking.
Motivational Needs in Conspiracy Thinking
The researchers found that overall, people were motivated to believe in conspiracy theories by a need to understand and feel safe in their environment and a need to feel like the community they identify with is superior to others.
Even though many conspiracy theories seem to provide clarity or a supposed secret truth about confusing events, a need for closure or a sense of control were not the strongest motivators to endorse conspiracy theories. Instead, the researchers found some evidence that people were more likely to believe specific conspiracy theories when they were motivated by social relationships. For instance, participants who perceived social threats were more likely to believe in events-based conspiracy theories, such as the theory that the U.S. government planned the September 11 terrorist attacks, rather than an abstract theory that, in general, governments plan to harm their citizens to retain power.
“These results largely map onto a recent theoretical framework advancing that social identity motives may give rise to being drawn to the content of a conspiracy theory, whereas people who are motivated by a desire to feel unique are more likely to believe in general conspiracy theories about how the world works,” according to Bowes.
How Personality Traits Shape Conspiratorial Thinking
The researchers also found that people with certain personality traits, such as a sense of antagonism toward others and high levels of paranoia, were more prone to believe conspiracy theories. Those who strongly believed in conspiracy theories were also more likely to be insecure, paranoid, emotionally volatile, impulsive, suspicious, withdrawn, manipulative, egocentric, and eccentric.
The Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism) had a much weaker relationship with conspiratorial thinking, though the researchers said that does not mean that general personality traits are irrelevant to a tendency to believe in conspiracy theories.
Bowes said that future research should be conducted with an awareness that conspiratorial thinking is complicated, and that there are important and diverse variables that should be explored in the relations among conspiratorial thinking, motivation and personality to understand the overall psychology behind conspiratorial ideas.
Reference: “The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates” by Shauna M. Bowes, Thomas H. Costello and Arber Tasimi, June 2023, Psychological Bulletin.
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000392
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
5 Comments
Well, there’s certainly plenty of fodder for the CT’s!! If it’s not Russia, aliens, DJT, World Economic Forum, Iran, Jews, Mormons or a combination of the above, Joe Biden can relax; no one in their right mind would suspect him of shenanigans! He just likes ice cream!
“Hey Bob I need a headline photo for my SciTech piece on conspiracy theorists”
“I’ve got just the thing.”
“Wow that’s perfect”
Is that Joe Biden on the right? He hasn’t aged well.
Given the mental weakness of the author, I suppose posting a picture of Donald John Trump next to an alien was the only way to get a click.
A new study suggests that belief in mainstream narratives is driven by certain personality traits and social motivations. Individuals who value validation and who feel a connection to their community are more likely to believe in such narratives
People can be prone to believe in mainstream narratives due to a combination of personality traits and motivations, including relying on the authority of others, feeling connected and secure around others, and perceiving their environment as safe, according to research published by the American Psychological Assholciation.
Those who strongly believed in official narratives were also more likely to be boring, close-minded, arrogant, and dumb.