Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Science»Plants Didn’t Evolve Gradually – They Evolved Complexity in Two Dramatic Bursts 250-Million-Years Apart
    Science

    Plants Didn’t Evolve Gradually – They Evolved Complexity in Two Dramatic Bursts 250-Million-Years Apart

    By Stanford UniversitySeptember 20, 20213 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    African Lily
    An African lily (Agapanthus africanus) flower is broken into component parts. According to a new classification of plant complexity, an African lily has 12 types of parts in its reproductive structure, some of which are on the seed or inside the ovary and not pictured here. In comparison, a typical fern has one type of reproductive part. Credit: Andrew Leslie

    A Stanford study used a new system to track reproductive complexity and found that modern plant diversity stems from intricate pollinator relationships formed only in recent geological history.

    A Stanford-led study reveals that rather than evolving gradually over hundreds of millions of years, land plants underwent major diversification in two dramatic bursts, 250 million years apart. The first occurred early in plant history, giving rise to the development of seeds, and the second took place during the diversification of flowering plants. 

    The research uses a novel but simple metric to classify plant complexity based on the arrangement and number of basic parts in their reproductive structures. While scientists have long assumed that plants became more complex with the advent of seeds and flowers, the new findings, published on September 17, 2021, in Science, offer insight into the timing and magnitude of those changes.

    “The most surprising thing is this kind of stasis, this plateau in complexity after the initial evolution of seeds and then the total change that happened when flowering plants started diversifying,” said lead study author Andrew Leslie, an assistant professor of geological sciences at Stanford’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences (Stanford Earth). “The reproductive structures look different in all these plants, but they all have about the same number of parts during that stasis.”

    An Unusual Comparison

    Flowers are more diverse than every other group of plants, producing colors, smells, and shapes that nourish animals and delight the senses. They are also intricate: petals, anthers and pistils interweave in precise arrangements to lure pollinators and trick them into spreading pollen from one flower to another. 

    This complexity makes it difficult for scientists to compare flowering plants to plants with simpler reproductive systems, such as ferns or some conifers. As a result, botanists have long focused on characteristics within family groups and typically study evolution in non-flowering plants separately from their more intricate flowering relatives. 

    Leslie and his co-authors overcame these differences by designing a system that classifies the number of different kinds of parts in reproductive structures based on observation alone. Each species was scored according to how many types of parts it has and the degree to which it exhibited clustering of those parts. They categorized about 1,300 land plant species from about 420 million years ago until the present.

    “This tells a pretty simple story about plant reproductive evolution in terms of form and function: The more functions the plants have and the more specific they are, the more parts they have,” Leslie said. “It’s a useful way of thinking about broad-scale changes encompassing the whole of plant history.”

    From Shrubs to Blooms

    When land plants first diversified in the early Devonian about 420 million to 360 million years ago, Earth was a warmer world devoid of trees or terrestrial vertebrate animals. Arachnids like scorpions and mites roamed the land amongst short, patchy plants and the tallest land organism was a 20-foot fungus resembling a tree trunk. After the Devonian, huge changes occurred in the animal kingdom: Land animals evolved to have large body sizes and more varied diets, insects diversified, dinosaurs appeared – but plants didn’t see a major change in reproductive complexity until they developed flowers.

    “Insect pollination and animal seed dispersal may have appeared as early as 300 million years ago, but it’s not until the last 100 million years that these really intricate interactions with pollinators are driving this super high complexity in flowering plants,” Leslie said. “There was such a long period of time where plants could have interacted with insects in the way that flowering plants do now, but they didn’t to the same degree of intricacy.”

    In the Late Cretaceous, about 100 to 66 million years ago, Earth more closely resembled the planet we know today – a bit like Yosemite National Park without the flowering trees and bushes. The second burst of complexity was more dramatic than the first, emphasizing the unique nature of flowering plants, according to Leslie. That period gave rise to plants like the passionflower, which can have 20 different types of parts, more than twice the number found in non-flowering plants.

    The researchers classified 472 living species, part of which Leslie carried out on and around Stanford’s campus by simply pulling apart local plants and counting their reproductive organs. The analysis includes vascular land plants – everything except mosses and a few early plants that lack supportive tissue for conducting water and minerals.

    “One thing we argue in this paper is that this classification simply reflects their functional diversity,” Leslie said. “They basically split up their labor in order to be more efficient at doing what they needed to do.”

    Reference: “Reproductive innovations and pulsed rise in plant complexity” by Andrew B. Leslie, Carl Simpson and Luke Mander, 17 September 2021, Science.
    DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6984

    Study co-authors include Carl Simpson of the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History and Luke Mander of The Open University.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Evolution Plant Science Popular Stanford University
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Extreme Genome Shrinkage: This Parasitic Plant Convinces Hosts To Grow Into Its Own Flesh

    Extremophytes: “Extreme” Plants Grow Faster in the Face of Stress

    400-Million-Year-Old Fossils Reveal How the First Roots Evolved

    Discovery Unravels Darwin’s “Abominable Mystery” Surrounding Origin of Flowering Plants

    “Pompeii of Prehistoric Plants” Unlocks Evolutionary Secret – Spectacular Fossil Plants Preserved Within a Volcanic Ash Fall

    Ancient DNA Continues to Rewrite the 9,000-Year Society-Shaping History of Corn

    Fossil Discovered in the 1960s Finally Reveals Its Secrets: New Plant Species That Lived About 365 Million Years Ago

    Snapshot of Evolution Captured by Newly Discovered 400 Million-Year-Old Plant

    What Caused Neanderthal Extinction and Were Our Human Ancestors to Blame?

    3 Comments

    1. Lerpracrer on September 22, 2021 5:56 am

      “They basically split up their labor in order to be more efficient”
      Uh?
      Classify things according to arbitrary patterns. Add a “story” with myriad of hiden assumptions (no testable work, just words). Give the impression that the story is about “knowing”, as classifying things had any connection with what really thappened in the past or with the real origin of seeds and other stunning complexities (avoid to deep in the details and in the requirements for this). Give even intentionality (again, no need to show any evidence) to the “characters” of your “story”. Is this evolutionary “science” in a nutshell? Is this really about “knowing” anything at all? Science matters.

      Reply
      • Eduardo Raad on September 26, 2021 4:23 am

        I would recommend you B. Wright (2005) and Algorithm for the Evolution of Species by Eduardo Raad Anton (2021) (Amazon ebook)

        Reply
    2. Michael W. Clark on October 26, 2023 9:04 pm

      100 Million Years ago to 66 Million Years ago was a period of relatively rapid changes.
      Water levels atop continents reached peak elevations, and by 82 Million years ago, started leaving the Continents, and rapidly filling Ocean Basins. The surface area of the Earth increased, the mass increased, subduction was created by differential vertical motions of the Ocean Basins compared to the Continents. Dinosaurs became smaller, and were zapped out of existence by a large space rock. Plants responded to dramatic changes of the Earth, in size, Climate, water on continents, available rainfall, Mountains on Continents, Rain shadows, etc. Plants were living the good life, then they had to
      change, or die out. They found successful ways to help in reproduction. Bright flowers, that smell good, and taste good, attract insects, and get a free ride to take pollen to other flowers. Diversification is a byproduct of tough, and changing times.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Millions Take These IBS Drugs, But a New Study Finds Serious Risks

    Scientists Unlock Hidden Secrets of 2,300-Year-Old Mummies Using Cutting-Edge CT Scanner

    Bread Might Be Making You Gain Weight Even Without Eating More Calories

    Scientists Discover Massive Magma Reservoir Beneath Tuscany

    Europe’s Most Active Volcano Just Got Stranger – Here’s Why Scientists Are Rethinking It

    Alzheimer’s Symptoms May Start Outside the Brain, Study Finds

    Millions Take This Popular Supplement – Scientists Discover a Concerning Link to Heart Failure

    The Universe Is Expanding Too Fast and Scientists Can’t Explain Why

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • U.S. Waste Holds $5.7 Billion Worth of Crop Nutrients
    • Scientists Say a Hidden Structure May Exist Inside Earth’s Core
    • Doctors Surprised by the Power of a Simple Drug Against Colon Cancer
    • Why Popular Diabetes Drugs Like Ozempic Don’t Work for Everyone: The “Genetic Glitch”
    • Scientists Create Improved Insulin Cells That Reverse Diabetes in Mice
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.