Brain Size Myth Debunked With New Evolutionary Insights

Brain Size Evolution Art

A new study involving 1,500 species shows that larger animals do not have proportionally bigger brains, challenging old views and introducing a curve model for brain-body size relationships, with significant findings in primates, rodents, and carnivores. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

Researchers have found that brain size does not increase proportionally with body size in larger animals, challenging longstanding beliefs.

The study, which analyzed data from 1,500 species, shows a non-linear relationship and highlights rapid evolutionary changes in brain size among primates, rodents, and carnivores.

Challenging Traditional Beliefs in Brain Evolution

Researchers at the University of Reading and Durham University collected an enormous dataset of brain and body sizes from around 1,500 species to clarify centuries of controversy surrounding brain size evolution.

Bigger brains relative to body size are linked to intelligence, sociality, and behavioral complexity – with humans having evolved exceptionally large brains. The new research, published today (July 8) in Nature Ecology & Evolution, reveals the largest animals do not have proportionally bigger brains, challenging long-held beliefs about brain evolution.

Professor Chris Venditti, lead author of the study from the University of Reading, said: “For more than a century, scientists have assumed that this relationship was linear – meaning that brain size gets proportionally bigger, the larger an animal is. We now know this is not true. The relationship between brain and body size is a curve, essentially meaning very large animals have smaller brains than expected.”

Professor Rob Barton, co-author of the study from Durham University, said: “Our results help resolve the puzzling complexity in the brain-body mass relationship. Our model has a simplicity that means previously elaborate explanations are no longer necessary – relative brain size can be studied using a single underlying model.”

Identifying Evolutionary Outliers

The research reveals a simple association between brain and body size across all mammals which allowed the researchers to identify the rule-breakers – species that challenge the norm.

Among these outliers includes our own species, Homo sapiens, which has evolved more than 20 times faster than all other mammal species, resulting in the massive brains that characterize humanity today. But humans are not the only species to buck this trend.

All groups of mammals demonstrated rapid bursts of change – both towards smaller and larger brain sizes. For example, bats very rapidly reduced their brain size when they first arose, but then showed very slow rates of change in relative brain size, suggesting there may be evolutionary constraints related to the demands of flight.

Exceptional Brain Size Growth in Certain Mammals

There are three groups of animals that showed the most pronounced rapid change in brain size: primates, rodents, and carnivores. In these three groups, there is a tendency for relative brain size to increase in time (the “Marsh-Lartet rule”). This is not a trend universal across all mammals, as previously believed.

Dr. Joanna Baker, co-author of the study also from the University of Reading, said: “Our results reveal a mystery. In the largest animals, there is something preventing brains from getting too big. Whether this is because big brains beyond a certain size are simply too costly to maintain remains to be seen. But as we also observe similar curvature in birds, the pattern seems to be a general phenomenon – what causes this ‘curious ceiling’ applies to animals with very different biology.”

Reference: “Co-evolutionary dynamics of mammalian brain and body size” by Chris Venditti, Joanna Baker and Robert A. Barton, 8 July 2024, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02451-3

2 Comments on "Brain Size Myth Debunked With New Evolutionary Insights"

  1. Clyde Spencer | July 8, 2024 at 8:46 am | Reply

    “In the largest animals, there is something preventing brains from getting too big.”

    That ‘something’ may well be the time it takes to communicate between neurons. Many large dinosaurs had more than one brain, using distributed calculations to reduce reaction time.

  2. Sydney Ross Singer | July 8, 2024 at 12:50 pm | Reply

    There is an implicit assumption that bigger is better. We assume that bigger brains are needed for more functions. However, as our computerized world shows, smaller is sometimes better. Old, big computers are not as efficient or capable as modern, small computers. When it comes to brain function, it’s not the size but how you use it that counts. And humans have a culture that alters how we use our brains. Social animals operate in coordination, so they have a type of “collective brain”. It’s a lot more complicated than just size, which, even for sexual organs, does not really matter.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.