Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Biology»MIT Neuroscientists Identify Brain Circuit That Drives Pleasure-Inducing Behavior
    Biology

    MIT Neuroscientists Identify Brain Circuit That Drives Pleasure-Inducing Behavior

    By Anne Trafton, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMarch 22, 20171 Comment5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Researchers Identify Brain Circuit That Drives Pleasure-Inducing Behavior
    MIT researchers discovered that the central amygdala, previously linked to fear, also responds to rewarding events. Activating this circuit makes animals seek those stimuli further, according to a study on mice.

    MIT neuroscientists identify the brain circuit that drives pleasure-inducing behavior in a brain region thought to be linked with fear.

    Scientists have long believed that the central amygdala, a structure located deep within the brain, is linked with fear and responses to unpleasant events.

    However, a team of MIT neuroscientists has now discovered a circuit in this structure that responds to rewarding events. In a study of mice, activating this circuit with certain stimuli made the animals seek those stimuli further. The researchers also found a circuit that controls responses to fearful events, but most of the neurons in the central amygdala are involved in the reward circuit, they report.

    “It’s surprising that positive-behavior-promoting subsets are so abundant, which is contrary to what many people in the field have been thinking,” says Susumu Tonegawa, the Picower Professor of Biology and Neuroscience and director of the RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics at the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory.

    Tonegawa is the senior author of the study, which appears in the March 22 issue of the journal Neuron. The paper’s lead authors are graduate students Joshua Kim and Xiangyu Zhang.

    Driving behavior

    The paper builds on a study published last year in which Tonegawa’s lab identified two distinct populations of neurons in a different part of the amygdala, known as the basolateral amygdala (BLA). These two populations are genetically programmed to encode either fearful or happy memories.

    In that study, the researchers found that the neurons encoding positive and negative memories relay information to different parts of the central amygdala. In their new work, they set out to further clarify the connections from the two BLA populations to the central amygdala, and to determine the functions of the central amygdala cells that receive information from the BLA.

    First, the researchers analyzed the genetic profiles of the central amygdala neurons and divided them into seven groups based on the genetic markers they express and their anatomical location. They then used optogenetics, a technique that allowed them to control neuron activity with light, to investigate the functions of each population.

    The researchers found that five of these populations stimulate reward-related behavior: When the mice were exposed to light, the mice repeatedly sought more light exposure because these neurons were driving a reward circuit. These same populations all receive input from the positive emotion cells in the BLA.

    Another population of neurons underlies fear-related innate and memory behaviors, and the last population was not required for either fear- or reward-related behavior.

    This finding contradicts the consensus that the central amygdala is involved primarily in fear-related behavior, the researchers say.

    “Classically people have generalized the central amygdala as a fear-related structure. They think it’s involved in anxiety and fear-related responses,” Kim says. “However, it looks like the structure as a whole mainly seems to participate in appetitive behaviors.”

    The researchers cannot rule out the possibility that some yet-to-be-discovered cells in the central amygdala control negative behavior, they say. “However, the cells that we have identified so far represent more than 90 percent of the central amygdala,” Tonegawa says. “If there are some other cells for negative behavior, it’s a small fraction.”

    “Most of the research on the amygdala during last 20 years has focused on the role of the central amygdala of the nucleus in mediating aversive responses,” says Richard Palmiter, a professor of biochemistry at the University of Washington, who was not involved in the research. “The Tonegawa lab has put together an amazing paper that will change the way scientists think about the central nucleus of the amygdala.”

    Surprising circuits

    In another surprising finding, the researchers discovered that the fear-linked neurons they identified in the central amygdala do not send messages directly to the part of the brain that is believed to receive fear-related input from the central amygdala. This part of the brain, the periaqueductal gray (PAG), is located in the brainstem and plays a role in responding to pain, stress, and external threats.

    Still unknown is where those central amygdala cells send their output, and whether it eventually gets to the PAG after stopping somewhere else. Tonegawa’s lab is now trying to trace these circuits further to find out where they go.

    The researchers are also studying the role of BLA neurons in fear extinction, which is the process of rewriting fearful memories so that they are associated with more positive feelings. This approach is often used to treat disorders such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the JPB Foundation.

    Reference: “Basolateral to Central Amygdala Neural Circuits for Appetitive Behaviors” by Joshua Kim, Xiangyu Zhang, Shruti Muralidhar, Sarah A. LeBlanc and Susumu Tonegawa, 22 March 2017, Neuron.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.034

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Brain Activity MIT Neurology Neuroscience Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    MIT Researchers Identify Cells That Represent Feelings of Isolation

    New Evidence That the Brain’s Inferotemporal Cortex Can Identify Objects

    Brain Scans Help Predict Whether Patients Will Respond to Therapy

    Understanding Inhibitory Neuron Activation Could Shed Light on Neurological Disorders

    Images of Brain Connectivity Help Predict Intelligence

    Reactivation of the Hippocampus Causes Memory Recall

    DRD2 May Protect Brain Regions from Alcohol-Induced Brain Damage

    Researchers Use FDDNP–PET Scanning to Predict Cognitive Decline

    Neuroscientists Create Model to Study Burst Suppression and Brain States

    1 Comment

    1. Joel A. Levitt on March 24, 2017 2:00 am

      It seems that we now have a basis for understanding mammalian learning and why positive reinforcement is more effective than negative.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Largest-Ever Study Finds Medicinal Cannabis Ineffective for Anxiety, Depression, PTSD

    250-Million-Year-Old Egg Solves One of Evolution’s Biggest Mysteries

    Living With Roommates Might Be Changing Your Gut Microbiome Without You Knowing

    Century-Old Cleaning Chemical Linked to 500% Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

    What if Your Memories Never Happened? Physicists Take a New Look at the Boltzmann Brain Paradox

    One of the Universe’s Largest Stars May Be Getting Ready To Explode

    Scientists Discover Enzyme That Could Supercharge Ozempic-Like Weight Loss Drugs

    Popular Sweetener Linked to DNA Damage – “It’s Something You Should Not Be Eating”

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Black Hole Jets Pack Power of 10,000 Suns, Stunning New Study Reveals
    • A Cosmic Crash Turned This Nearby Galaxy Into Chaos
    • This Alien Solar System Doesn’t Follow the Rules – and Scientists Are Intrigued
    • What Did Prehistoric Europeans Eat? Scientists Uncover Surprising Answers
    • Scientists Say This Overlooked Organ Could Hold the Key to Longer Life
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.