Refueling at the Moon May Be the Best Option for a Piloted Mission to Mars

Refueling at the Moon is the Best Option for Successful Mission to Mars

Refueling at the Moon. Illustration: Christine Daniloff/MIT

New research from MIT shows that stopping at the moon may be the best option for a piloted mission to Mars, revealing that fueling up on the moon could streamline cargo by 68 percent.

Launching humans to Mars may not require a full tank of gas: A new MIT study suggests that a Martian mission may lighten its launch load considerably by refueling on the moon.

Previous studies have suggested that lunar soil and water ice in certain craters of the moon may be mined and converted to fuel. Assuming that such technologies are established at the time of a mission to Mars, the MIT group has found that taking a detour to the moon to refuel would reduce the mass of a mission upon launch by 68 percent.

The group developed a model to determine the best route to Mars, assuming the availability of resources and fuel-generating infrastructure on the moon. Based on their calculations, they determined the optimal route to Mars, in order to minimize the mass that would have to be launched from Earth — often a major cost driver in space exploration missions.

They found the most mass-efficient path involves launching a crew from Earth with just enough fuel to get into orbit around the Earth. A fuel-producing plant on the surface of the moon would then launch tankers of fuel into space, where they would enter gravitational orbit. The tankers would eventually be picked up by the Mars-bound crew, which would then head to a nearby fueling station to gas up before ultimately heading to Mars.

Olivier de Weck, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics and of engineering systems at MIT, says the plan deviates from NASA’s more direct “carry-along” route.

“This is completely against the established common wisdom of how to go to Mars, which is a straight shot to Mars, carry everything with you,” de Weck says. “The idea of taking a detour into the lunar system … it’s very unintuitive. But from an optimal network and big-picture view, this could be very affordable in the long term, because you don’t have to ship everything from Earth.”

The results, which are based on the Ph.D. thesis of Takuto Ishimatsu, now a postdoc at MIT, are published in the Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets.

A faraway strategy

In the past, space exploration programs have adopted two main strategies in supplying mission crews with resources: a carry-along approach, where all vehicles and resources travel with the crew at all times — as on the Apollo missions to the moon — and a “resupply strategy,” in which resources are replenished regularly, such as by spaceflights to the International Space Station.

However, as humans explore beyond Earth’s orbit, such strategies may not be sustainable, as de Weck and Ishimatsu write: “As budgets are constrained and destinations are far away from home, a well-planned logistics strategy becomes imperative.”

The team proposes that missions to Mars and other distant destinations may benefit from a supply strategy that hinges on “in-situ resource utilization” — the idea that resources such as fuel, and provisions such as water and oxygen, may be produced and collected along the route of space exploration. Materials produced in space would replace those that would otherwise be transported from Earth.

For example, water ice — which could potentially be mined and processed into rocket fuel — has been found on both Mars and the moon.

“There’s a pretty high degree of confidence that these resources are available,” de Weck says. “Assuming you can extract these resources, what do you do with it? Almost nobody has looked at that question.”

Building a network in space

To see whether fuel resources and infrastructure in space would benefit manned missions to Mars, Ishimatsu developed a network flow model to explore various routes to Mars — ranging from a direct carry-along flight to a series of refueling pit stops along the way. The objective of the model was to minimize the mass that would be launched from Earth, even when including the mass of a fuel-producing plant, and spares that would need to be pre-deployed.

The approach models the movement of cargo and commodities, such as fuel, in a supply chain network in space. Ishimatsu developed a new mathematical model that improves on a conventional model for routing vehicles. He adapted the model for the more complex scenario of long-term missions in space — taking into account constraints specific to space travel.

The model assumes a future scenario in which fuel can be processed on, and transported from, the moon to rendezvous points in space. Likewise, the model assumes that fuel depots can be located at certain gravitationally bound locations in space, called Lagrange points. Given a mission objective, such as a set of weight restrictions, the model identifies the best route in the supply network, while also satisfying the constraints of basic physics.

Ishimatsu says the research demonstrates the importance of establishing a resource-producing infrastructure in space. He emphasizes that such infrastructure may not be necessary for a first trip to Mars. But a resource network in space would enable humans to make the journey repeatedly in a sustainable way.

“Our ultimate goal is to colonize Mars and to establish a permanent, self-sustainable human presence there,” Ishimatsu says. “However, equally importantly, I believe that we need to ‘pave a road’ in space so that we can travel between planetary bodies in an affordable way.”

“The optimization suggests that the moon could play a major role in getting us to Mars repeatedly and sustainably,” de Weck adds. “People have hinted at that before, but we think this is the first definitive paper that shows mathematically why that’s the right answer.”

William Gerstenmaier, associate administrator for human exploration and operations at NASA, says understanding what resources may be available, both along the way to Mars and once there, is “essential to sustainable human presence beyond low-Earth orbit.”

“The paper shows clearly that leveraging water and other valuable in-space resources will lower the cost for human exploration of the solar system,” says Gerstenmaier, who was not involved in the research. “NASA had previously planned on using Mars resources to reduce propellant needs at Mars. This study, along with others, is showing the potential advantages of using lunar resources as well.”

Reference: “A Generalized Multi-Commodity Network Flow Model for Space Exploration Logistics (AIAA 2013-5414)” by Takuto Ishimatsu, Olivier De Weck, Jeffrey Hoffman, Yoshiaki Ohkami and Robert Shishko, 10 September 2013, AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition.
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-5414


1 Comment on "Refueling at the Moon May Be the Best Option for a Piloted Mission to Mars"

  1. I have an Uncle who worked for Lockheed on the TR-3B Project Aurora. Back in the late 1990’s at an extended family gathering I asked him if the Aurora craft was a ramjet and he said no. I asked him if it was a conventional jet and he said no. I asked him if it was a chemical rocket and he said no. I asked him if it was anti-gravity and he got very nervous and said, “I can’t talk about it.” He quickly walked away from me and avoided me the rest of the gathering and to this day avoids conversation with me. When I worked on the first Kucinich for President Primary campaign I had an Air Force General in military intelligence tell me that the Aurora craft used “pulsed magnetic propulsion” and that it takes a lot of energy to fly it. Earlier this year there was a report on the NBC Evening News of a very loud “pulsed” sonic boom (as in repeated short loud booms) over the northeastern USA and then 17 minutes later over part of Britain. (That’s anti-gravity propulsion!) The news anchor said that sources say that it was Project Aurora which uses a pulsed propulsion system and that its existence would probably be officially revealed in five years. Why are we wasting tax payer’s big bucks on the Orion rocket, an outmoded system? Government insiders say that we have already traveled to Mars with the secret anti-gravity ships; our government needs to end the Cosmic Coverup! I have another relative in my extended family who formerly was a civilian worker at Area 51 and he was told that if he told his family what he was seeing and doing at Area 51 then he and his wife and kids would be killed. He’s kept his mouth shut. It’s the fascist bankster mega-billionaire families rule over our government that is responsible for the cover up of advanced technology.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.