Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Space»Space Emerges From Time? Groundbreaking Theory Upends Einstein
    Space

    Space Emerges From Time? Groundbreaking Theory Upends Einstein

    By Rod Boyce, University of Alaska FairbanksJune 26, 202536 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Clock Spiral Time Travel Space Physics
    Three intertwined time directions may underpin everything, turning space into mere “paint on the canvas” and pushing physics toward a long-sought theory of everything. Credit: Shutterstock

    A bold new framework suggests time isn’t a lone linear thread but a three-dimensional canvas from which space itself emerges.

    By weaving these extra time axes into his equations, physicist Gunther Kletetschka recreates known particle masses, keeps cause before effect, and hints at a route to unify quantum mechanics with gravity. If borne out by experiments, 3D time could rewrite our deepest story of reality.

    Time as 3D Canvas

    Imagine a universe where time itself is the true stage for reality. A new theory from Gunther Kletetschka at the University of Alaska Fairbanks suggests that every physical event unfolds within time alone, and that time actually has three independent directions. Space emerges as a secondary manifestation.

    “These three time dimensions are the primary fabric of everything, like the canvas of a painting,” said associate research professor Gunther Kletetschka at the UAF Geophysical Institute. “Space still exists with its three dimensions, but it’s more like the paint on the canvas rather than the canvas itself.”

    Challenging Classic Spacetime

    That idea stands in sharp contrast to the century-old notion of spacetime, which treats one dimension of time and three of space as a single entity. Kletetschka’s mathematics combines the three time axes with the familiar spatial ones to create six total dimensions. He believes this framework could edge scientists closer to a single, unifying explanation of the universe.

    Grasping extra directions of time is tricky, and many theorists have proposed versions of the concept. Kletetschka’s advance lies in matching his model to known particle masses and other measurable properties, turning an intriguing idea into a testable hypothesis.

    Testable 3D Time Framework

    Kletetschka’s work, published recently in Reports in Advances of Physical Science, adds to a long-running body of research by theoretical physicists on a subject outside of mainstream physics.

    He writes that his mathematical framework for three-dimensional time improves on others’ proposals by making testable reproductions of known particle masses and other physical properties.

    “Earlier 3D time proposals were primarily mathematical constructs without these concrete experimental connections,” he said. “My work transforms the concept from an interesting mathematical possibility into a physically testable theory with multiple independent verification channels.”

    The theory could be used to predict currently unknown particle properties and aid in pursuing the origin of mass — and, ultimately, helping solve one of the biggest questions in physics.

    How 3D Time Works

    Three-dimensional time is a theory in which time, like space, has multiple independent directions — typically imagined as three axes of time motion, similar in concept to the spatial X, Y and Z axes.

    Imagine you are walking down a straight path, moving forward and therefore experiencing time as we know it. Now imagine another path that crosses the first one, going sideways.

    If you could step onto that sideways path and remain in the same moment of “regular time,” you might find that things could be slightly different — perhaps a different version of the same day. Moving along this perpendicular second path could let you explore different outcomes of that day without going backward or forward in time as we know it.

    Solving Causality & Energy Unfolding

    The existence of those different outcomes is the second dimension of time. The means to transition from one outcome to another is the third dimension.

    Kletetschka said his theory overcomes some of the problems with earlier three-dimensional time theories that are based on traditional physics.

    Those earlier theories, for example, describe multiple time dimensions in which cause-and-effect relationships are potentially ambiguous. Kletetschka’s theory ensures that causes still precede effects, even with multiple time dimensions, just in a more complex mathematical structure.

    In three-dimensional time, the second and third dimensions are thought by some researchers, notably theoretical physicist Itzhak Bars of the University of Southern California, to become apparent, or unfold, at levels of extreme energy such as during the early universe or in high-energy particle interactions.

    Toward a Theory of Everything

    The pursuit of three-dimensional time theory is believed by Bars and other theoretical physicists to be an avenue for helping answer some big physics questions that have stumped scientists.

    Kletetschka’s approach might even help resolve the grandest of all unresolved physics challenges: unifying quantum mechanics — the behavior of particles at the smallest scales — and gravity into a single quantum theory of gravity.

    A quantum theory of gravity could lead to, or become, a grand theory of the universe — the so-called “theory of everything.” The elusive unifying theory would unite the four fundamental forces of nature — electromagnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, and gravity.

    Bridging Mass & Gravity Puzzles

    The standard model of particle physics unites the first three. Gravity is explained through Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

    The two are incompatible, so physicists have been searching for that “theory of everything” to unite them. Finding the origin of particle masses is central in that pursuit.

    Kletetschka believes his theory of three-dimensional time can help. His framework accurately reproduces the known masses of particles such as electrons, muons, and quarks and also explains why these particles have these masses.

    “The path to unification might require fundamentally reconsidering the nature of physical reality itself,” he said. “This theory demonstrates how viewing time as three-dimensional can naturally resolve multiple physics puzzles through a single coherent mathematical framework.”

    Reference: “Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics” by Gunther Kletetschka, 21 April 2025, Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences.
    DOI: 10.1142/S2424942425500045

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Astrophysics Popular Spacetime Time University of Alaska Fairbanks
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Is the Universe Infinite? The Surprising Truth About Cosmic Geometry

    Could Black Holes Be Portals to a New Universe? Scientists Weigh In

    Mystery Waves Suggest Universe Holds Untapped Secrets

    Counting Galaxies To Solve a Cosmological Puzzle: Putting the Theory of Special Relativity Into Practice

    Rogue Planets Captured by Stars

    Ancient Galactic Collision Created Stellar Swirls of NGC 5907

    The Bolshoi Simulation: Boxing the Universe

    Scientists Convene to Take a Picture of the Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of the Milky Way

    Black Hole Fires Cosmic Bullets of Ionized Gases

    36 Comments

    1. Ryan stephens on June 26, 2025 3:34 am

      Thoughts are super minde

      Reply
    2. Don Bronkema on June 26, 2025 3:37 am

      Could finally dispatch slavering Bible-pounders…

      Reply
      • J Dayton on June 26, 2025 9:59 am

        Why would it dispatch slavering bible pounders? God can work in any way she wishes.
        She even let’s people like you exist in her domain. Have an interesting life!

        Reply
        • AG3 on June 26, 2025 3:16 pm

          Grow up. Give up your imaginary friends. God doesn’t show up, provides not even indirect evidence of his existence, the so-called religious books contain no useful information about the universe. Instead enjoy the labors of scientists at least trying to figure out how nature works.

          Reply
          • Bob on July 1, 2025 5:36 am

            Your reply explains everything I need to know about you, you are not a good person.

            Reply
        • Bob on June 26, 2025 5:20 pm

          The word is “goddess”.

          Reply
    3. Boba on June 26, 2025 5:42 am

      What difference does it make? We’re still stuck in it.

      Reply
    4. Robert on June 26, 2025 7:51 am

      This is not having an imagination, especially in the face of the obvious.

      Reply
    5. T. Spencer on June 26, 2025 11:51 am

      I wonder if this could tie to the Simulation theory. Our reality could be a computer simulation. For the religious folks, God could be a computer.

      Reply
      • AG3 on June 26, 2025 3:21 pm

        Even if God is running the simulation we live in, the question remains as to who is running the simulation of God’s universe.

        Reply
        • T. Spencer on June 27, 2025 12:03 am

          I think the more interesting question is not who but why. Is it for scientific research, entertainment, or something else? There’s some speculation that there could be simulations creating their own simulations to who knows how many levels. Difficult to prove or disprove but could end up being the most likely explanation for the way things work. Tough to sell to the pure science guys.

          Reply
        • Robert Welch on June 27, 2025 8:01 am

          And where did we come from, exactly? And why was it there to begin with?
          At some point the question turns into an exercise in philosophy.

          Reply
          • AG3 on June 28, 2025 9:06 am

            All of science was once philosophy. So, no wonder that questions to which science doesn’t yet know the answers are considered philosophy.

            Reply
            • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 12:33 pm

              Your point? All of philosophy was once religious mysticism. In the modern day they are different areas.

            • AG3 on June 28, 2025 3:21 pm

              TL, the point might have been there if you read the post i was responding to. This is the second time you have missed the context in your typical hurricane commenting spree.

            • Robert Welch on June 29, 2025 6:44 am

              Second time…? You’re still new to this platform, aren’t you.

      • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 12:32 pm

        Look out for glitches in the Matrix – the cats are certain to walk in since you can’t simulate reality to infinite precision.

        Reply
    6. Mike F. on June 26, 2025 2:16 pm

      This is what happens when you legalize weed.

      Reply
      • Rowan Brad Quni on June 27, 2025 9:30 am

        And this is peer-reviewed, folks! I’m just happy it doesn’t mention “time crystals,” “string theory,” or “dark matter” as justification.

        Reply
        • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 1:17 pm

          Not peer reviewed by certified peers chosen by the journal, instead they are chosen by the author (so it could be faked). Most damning, the publisher is listed in the Beall’s list of predatory publishers.

          Perhaps you are not as good a judge of science as you think. Of the listed topics that you want to criticize, time crystals and dark matter has been observed (while string theory remains a useful math tool).

          Reply
          • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 1:32 pm

            Oops, I made an error, it is not listed but it is considered borderline.

            Reply
    7. Bob on June 26, 2025 5:18 pm

      And Black Holes are three dimensonial tears in the three dimensional canvas of time……….

      A canvas being effectively 2 dimensional the use of the word ‘canvas’ seems a bit sloppy.

      Reply
    8. Robert on June 27, 2025 7:34 am

      There is no xyz – math is simply math (squiggles people have fun with) and not the Universe.

      Reply
      • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 1:19 pm

        We can show that there are 1 time and 3 space dimensions, else general relativity wouldn’t be such a good fit to observations.

        Reply
    9. Rowan Brad Quni on June 27, 2025 9:28 am

      What are the “concrete experimental connections?” Also, if space emerges from “time” (not clear how that’s operationalized?) the subhead “Time as 3D Canvas” is rather confusing…

      Reply
    10. Robin C on June 28, 2025 9:45 am

      Reads like a rehash of old Sci-Fi tropes, moving sideways in time to experience different timelines.

      Reply
    11. Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 12:30 pm

      It is a non-relativistic theory – gravity does not travel slower than light (and the proposed difference in the work is picked to cover the range allowed by multimessenger observations by a binary neutron star merger [B. P. Abbott et al 2017 ApJL 848 L13].

      Mainly it is a numerological exercise where the “time dimensions” are picked to equal the number of flavor dimensions in the standard model of particles, giving a new meaning to wavefunctions. One can think of it as Bode’s law for particles.

      Oh, and that standard model is not incompatible with general relativy since they are both relativistic description that can be put as quantum field theories. [Quantum gravity as a low energy effective field theory
      John F Donoghue (2017), Scholarpedia, 12(4):32997.]

      Reply
      • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 12:37 pm

        And it is published in a journal which publisher is listed in the updated Beall’s list of predatory journals (so it isn’t peer review published). Rod Boyce should have lent his name to the press release.

        Reply
        • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 1:13 pm

          Oops, it is one of those journals that require outside “peer review” chosen by the author (so it could be faked).

          Reply
          • Torbjörn Larsson on June 28, 2025 1:33 pm

            And another mistake that seem to sew everything together: it is not listed but it is considered borderline.

            Reply
          • Zelalem on August 2, 2025 1:32 pm

            Science has just got REAL!!

            Reply
    12. PhysicsPundit on June 28, 2025 2:56 pm

      University of Alaska appears to have poor academic standards, promoting this work, which was published in a low quality journal. I have no doubt the author paid to have it published there with intent to promote it. Perhaps he was just seeking attention, or it was a prank. The paper is atrociously flawed. Maybe it was AI generated (hallucinatory).

      Reply
    13. AG3 on June 28, 2025 3:09 pm

      I read the analogy this way:
      Paint on canvas: paint is what we see, canvas is the real thing.
      Space on 3D time: space is what we see, 3D time is the real thing.

      Reply
    14. Liz on June 30, 2025 3:29 am

      “If you could step onto that sideways path and remain in the same moment of “regular time,” you might find that things could be slightly
      different — perhaps a different version of the same day. Moving along this perpendicular second path could let you explore different
      outcomes of that day without going backward or forward”

      Well, yes, that’s almost exactly how it’s done, but so far I only know how to do it in thought, but changes there can have real consequences here, because in that mode, thought alone is all that is needed for time travel; of course first one needs to make sure that you are really there and not hallucinating or dreaming; finishing.someone else’s unpredictable story for them correctly, is a great test; which is why I only tried to go back in time once, because there’s no way that I know of, of checking it’s reality.

      A near death experience is a great way to experience a parallel universe, but the phenomena can be created artificially, by another phenomena known as an out-of-body experience, apparently dogs are also capable of this feat; in which case it’s known as a ghost, but that’s another story.

      In my last expedition to a parallel universe, I didn’t actually go anywhere, but used the the parallel universe for a time displacement. So, please don’t trash this theory for religious reasons, like Einstein. At least one of those parallel universes is what some people call heaven, or at least part of it.

      Developing a technology to complement this theory would greatly enhance mankind’s understanding of the real universe, for which this one is just a tiny sliver. However, a small cavity, Mankind must learn to behave itself and control its mind or it may unconsciously destroy itself unintentionally.

      Other than that, I’m sure humanity could find a machine to get themselves there, so that they don’t have to dwell on it.

      The editors no doubt will delete this.

      Reply
    15. Ralph Johnson on June 30, 2025 5:59 am

      One thing is certain when people pass from this life into the eternal infinite you will all get your answer . I like birds can I give anybody one .

      Reply
    16. Ralph on July 2, 2025 10:57 pm

      I have the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything. The issue is, the question was wrong.

      42.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Scientists Discover 132-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Tracks on South Africa’s Coast

    Scientists Uncover the Secret Ingredient Behind the Spark That May Have Started Life on Earth

    Physicists Observe Matter in Two Places at Once in Mind-Bending Quantum Experiment

    Stanford Scientists Discover Hidden Brain Circuit That Fuels Chronic Pain

    New Study Reveals Why Ozempic Works Better for Some People Than Others

    Climate Change Is Altering a Key Greenhouse Gas in a Way Scientists Didn’t Expect

    New Study Suggests Gravitational Waves May Have Created Dark Matter

    Scientists Discover Why the Brain Gets Stuck in Schizophrenia

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • 320 Light-Years Away, a Planet Confirms a Fundamental Cosmic Assumption
    • Astronomers Solve Decades-Long Mystery About Saturn’s Spin – “Something Strange Was Happening”
    • Scientists Uncover Strange New State of Matter Inside Uranus and Neptune
    • The Crown Jewel of Dentistry? Breakthrough Tech Could Transform Tooth Repair
    • The Surprising Non-Medical Factor That Determines Cancer Survival
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.