
Theoretical study suggests that small black holes born in the early universe may have left behind hollow planetoids and microscopic tunnels, and that we should start searching rocks and old buildings for them.
New theoretical research explores innovative methods to detect primordial black holes, suggesting that signatures of these elusive objects could range from hollow planetoids in space to microscopic tunnels in earthly materials. The study highlights the minimal cost and significant potential of these methods in advancing our understanding of dark matter.
Primordial Black Holes
When you think of a black hole forming, you might picture a massive star exhausting its fuel and collapsing under its own gravity. However, the turbulent conditions of the early universe could have created many small black holes long before stars even existed.
These “primordial black holes” have been a subject of scientific theory for decades. Some researchers suggest they might even account for dark matter — the mysterious, invisible substance that makes up 85% of the universe’s mass.
Despite these theories, no primordial black hole has ever been directly detected.
Exploring the Unknown: Detection Methods
Now, a new study co-led by researchers at the University at Buffalo takes a creative approach to the search. The study proposes looking for evidence of these black holes on two vastly different scales: hollow planetoids in space and tiny microscopic tunnels in everyday materials here on Earth, such as rocks, metal, and glass.
Set to be published in the December issue of Physics of the Dark Universe and available online now, the theoretical study posits that a primordial black hole trapped within a large rocky object out in the cosmos would consume its liquid core and leave it hollow. Alternatively, a faster primordial black hole might leave behind straight tunnels large enough to be visible by a microscope if passing through solid material, including material right here on Earth.
“The chances of finding these signatures are small, but searching for them would not require much resources, and the potential payoff, the first evidence of a primordial black hole, would be immense,” says the study’s co-author, Dejan Stojkovic, PhD, professor of physics in the UB College of Arts and Sciences. “We have to think outside of the box because what has been done to find primordial black holes previously hasn’t worked.”
Investigating Cosmic and Earthly Signs
The study calculated how large a hollow planetoid could be without collapsing in on itself, and the likelihood of a primordial black hole passing through an object on Earth. (If you’re worried about a primordial black hole passing through you, don’t be. The study concluded it would not be fatal.)
“Because of these long odds, we have focused on solid marks that have existed for thousands, millions, and even billions of years,” says co-author De-Chang Dai, PhD, of National Dong Hwa University and Case Western Reserve University.
Stojkovic’s work was supported by the National Science Foundation, while Dai’s work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (Taiwan).
Hollow Objects Could Be No Bigger Than 1/10 of Earth
As the universe rapidly expanded after the Big Bang, areas of space may have been denser than their surroundings, causing them to collapse and form primordial black holes (PBHs).
PBHs would have much less mass than the stellar black holes later formed by dying stars, but they would still be extremely dense, like the mass of a mountain compacted into an area the size of an atom.
Stojkovic, who has previously proposed where to find theoretical wormholes, wondered if a PBH ever became trapped within a planet, moon or asteroid, either during or after its formation.
“If the object has a liquid central core, then a captured PBH can absorb the liquid core, whose density is higher than the density of the outer solid layer,” Stojkovic says.
The PBH then might escape the object if the object was impacted by an asteroid, leaving nothing but a hollow shell.
But would such a shell be strong enough to support itself, or would it simply collapse under its own tension? Comparing the strength of natural materials like granite and iron with surface tension and surface density, the researchers calculated that such a hollow object could be no more than one-tenth of Earth’s radius, making it more likely to be a minor planet than a proper planet.
“If it is any bigger than that, it’s going to collapse,” Stojkovic says.
These hollow objects could be detectable with telescopes. Mass, and therefore density, can be determined by studying an object’s orbit.
“If the object’s density is too low for its size, that’s a good indication it’s hollow,” Stojkovic says.
Everyday Objects Could Be Black Hole Detectors
For objects without a liquid core, PBHs might simply pass through and leave behind a straight tunnel, the study proposes. For example, a PBH with a mass of 1022 grams — that’s a 10 with 22 zeros — would leave behind a tunnel 0.1 micron thick.
A large slab of metal or other material could serve as an effective black hole detector by being monitored for the sudden appearance of these tunnels, but Stojovic says you’d have better odds searching for existing tunnels in very old materials — from buildings that are hundreds of years old, to rocks that are billions of years old.
Still, even assuming that dark matter is indeed made up of PBHs, they calculated the probability of a PBH passing through a billion-year-old boulder to be 0.000001.
“You have to look at the cost versus the benefit. Does it cost much to do this? No, it doesn’t,” Stojkovic says.
So the likelihood of a PBH passing through you during your lifetime is small, to say the least. Even if one did, you probably wouldn’t notice it.
Unlike a rock, human tissue has a small amount of tension, so a PBH would not tear it apart. And while a PBH’s kinetic energy may be huge, it cannot release much of it during a collision because it’s moving so fast.
“If a projectile is moving through a medium faster than the speed of sound, the medium’s molecular structure doesn’t have time to respond,” Stojkovic says. “Throw a rock through a window, it’s likely going to shatter. Shoot a window with a gun, it’s likely to just leave a hole.”
New Theoretical Directions
Theoretical studies such as this are crucial, Stojkovic says, noting that many physical concepts that once seemed implausible are now considered likely.
The field, Stojkovic adds, is currently facing some serious problems, dark matter among them. Its last major revolutions — quantum mechanics and general relativity — are a century old.
“The smartest people on the planet have been working on these problems for 80 years and have not solved them yet,” he says. “We don’t need a straightforward extension of the existing models. We probably need a completely new framework altogether.”
Reference: “Searching for small primordial black holes in planets, asteroids and here on Earth” by De-Chang Dai and Dejan Stojkovic, 19 September 2024, Physics of the Dark Universe.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101662
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
1 Comment
Primordial black holes would be exceedingly rare, if they exist at all.
And while the study author suggests it would resolve dark matter properties more than we already know, astronomical studies has concluded:
“that PBHs can only make up a small portion of dark matter if any at all.”
[Universe Today, June 25, 2024 by Evan Gough, Another Strike Against Primordial Black Holes as an Explanation for Dark Matter]
The hole boring suggestion rings a bell: biologists have long looked for biotracers in rocks. It was found that prokaryotes can make a living by boring holes in the range 0.5 – 10 um wide in pillow lavas, the glassy material being amenable to acid etching. [Alt, J.C., Kinoshita, H., Stokking, L.B., and Michael, P.J. (Eds.), 1996 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 148 13. MICROBIAL ACTIVITY IN THE ALTERATION OF GLASS FROM PILLOW LAVAS FROM HOLE 896A1] I’m fairly sure that scientists have looked long and hard at other minerals after they found the significant in numbers jackpot material.
The pillow lavas observed in the last reference were dated to 6 million years, so neither as old (3.8 billion years at Isua) or young (0 years at Hawaii) as such can be. Seems the hard reality of astronomy and geobiology conspire against theoretical notions of primordial black holes.