Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Biology»A Simple Spark That May Explain How Life Began
    Biology

    A Simple Spark That May Explain How Life Began

    By University College LondonSeptember 2, 20256 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Abstract Origin of Life Cells
    A breakthrough experiment shows how RNA and amino acids might have joined to spark the first steps toward life. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com

    Scientists have recreated a crucial step that may have set life in motion nearly four billion years ago.

    By showing how amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, could spontaneously link with RNA under early Earth conditions, researchers have revealed a potential missing link in biology’s origins.

    Origins of Life’s Building Blocks

    Researchers at UCL have discovered how two essential ingredients of life, RNA (ribonucleic acid) and amino acids, may have naturally combined about four billion years ago at the dawn of life.

    Amino acids are the basic components of proteins, which act as the engines of life and drive nearly every biological function. However, proteins cannot copy themselves or generate instructions for their own production. Those instructions come from RNA, a molecule closely related to DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid).

    Proteins, RNA, and the Blueprint of Life

    In findings published in Nature, the team successfully attached amino acids to RNA under conditions similar to those that might have existed on early Earth. Scientists have been attempting to accomplish this since the early 1970s without success until now.

    Professor Matthew Powner, senior author from UCL’s Department of Chemistry, explained: “Life relies on the ability to synthesize proteins – they are life’s key functional molecules. Understanding the origin of protein synthesis is fundamental to understanding where life came from.

    “Our study is a big step towards this goal, showing how RNA might have first come to control protein synthesis.

    Toward Understanding Protein Synthesis

    “Life today uses an immensely complex molecular machine, the ribosome, to synthesize proteins. This machine requires chemical instructions written in messenger RNA, which carries a gene’s sequence from a cell’s DNA to the ribosome. The ribosome then, like a factory assembly line, reads this RNA and links together amino acids, one by one, to create a protein.

    “We have achieved the first part of that complex process, using very simple chemistry in water at neutral pH to link amino acids to RNA. The chemistry is spontaneous, selective, and could have occurred on the early Earth.”

    Simple Chemistry with Big Implications

    Previous attempts to attach amino acids to RNA used highly reactive molecules, but these broke down in water and caused the amino acids to react with each other, rather than become linked to RNA.

    For the new study, the researchers took inspiration from biology, using a gentler method to convert life’s amino acids into a reactive form. This activation involved a thioester, a high-energy chemical compound important in many of life’s biochemical processes and that has already been theorized to play a role at the start of life.[1]

    Professor Powner said: “Our study unites two prominent origin of life theories – the ‘RNA world’, where self-replicating RNA is proposed to be fundamental, and the ‘thioester world’, in which thioesters are seen as the energy source for the earliest forms of life.”

    Bridging Competing Origin Theories

    To form these thioesters, the amino acids react with a sulfur-bearing compound called pantetheine. Last year, the same team published a paper demonstrating that pantetheine can be synthesized under early Earth-like conditions, suggesting it was likely to play a role in the origin of life.

    The next step, the researchers said, was to determine how RNA sequences could bind preferentially to specific amino acids, allowing RNA to begin coding instructions for protein synthesis—the origin of the genetic code.

    “There are numerous problems to overcome before we can fully elucidate the origin of life, but the most challenging and exciting remains the origins of protein synthesis,” said Professor Powner.

    Lead author Dr. Jyoti Singh, from UCL Chemistry, said: “Imagine the day that chemists might take simple, small molecules, consisting of carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur atoms, and from these LEGO pieces form molecules capable of self-replication. This would be a monumental step towards solving the question of life’s origin.

    “Our study brings us closer to that goal by demonstrating how two primordial chemical LEGO pieces (activated amino acids and RNA) could have built peptides,[2] short chains of amino acids that are essential to life.

    “What is particularly groundbreaking is that the activated amino acid used in this study is a thioester, a type of molecule made from Coenzyme A, a chemical found in all living cells. This discovery could potentially link metabolism, the genetic code, and protein building.”

    While the paper focuses solely on the chemistry, the research team said that the reactions they demonstrated could plausibly have taken place in pools or lakes of water on the early Earth (but not likely in the oceans, as the concentrations of the chemicals would likely be too diluted).

    The reactions are too small to see with a visible-light microscope and were tracked using a range of techniques that are used to probe the structure of molecules, including several types of magnetic resonance imaging (which shows how the atoms are arranged) and mass spectrometry (which shows the size of molecules).

    Notes

    1. The Nobel laureate Christian de Duve proposed that life began with a “thioester world” – a metabolism-first theory that envisages life was started by chemical reactions powered by the energy in thioesters.
    2. Peptides typically consist of two to 50 amino acids, while proteins are larger, often containing hundreds or even thousands of amino acids, and are folded into a 3D shape. As part of their study, the research team showed how, once the amino acids were loaded onto the RNA, they could be synthesized with other amino acids to form peptides.

    Reference: “Thioester-mediated RNA aminoacylation and peptidyl-RNA synthesis in water” by Jyoti Singh, Benjamin Thoma, Daniel Whitaker, Max Satterly Webley, Yuan Yao and Matthew W. Powner, 27 August 2025, Nature.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09388-y

    The work was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Simons Foundation and the Royal Society.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.

    Amino Acid Biochemistry Protein University College London
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Accelerating Drug Development With New Way of Identifying Proteins

    Sugar Code in Protein: Paving the Way for Development of Biopharmaceuticals

    Protein’s ‘Silent Code’ Affects How Cells Move – “On a Global, Philosophical Level, This Expands Our Understanding of Genetic Code”

    Aiming to to Form Biological Patterns, Scientists Dissect and Redesign Protein-Based Pattern Formation

    Experiment Creates an Essential Component of Life – Finds Deep Sea Vents Had Ideal Conditions for Origin of Life

    ‘NoBody’ – A Microprotein on a Mission

    Yale Researchers Create a 21st Amino Acid

    p65 Protein and Its Interaction With Telomerase RNA

    Targeting Dkk1 for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease

    6 Comments

    1. Anonymous on September 2, 2025 4:03 am

      Yes I would like to learn more bout a specific topic. Are zombies real can they actually create something to bio weaponry true due to apocalyptic circumstances or other words end of the world where in the bible does it say that the dead will walk

      Reply
    2. Rob on September 2, 2025 5:48 am

      And how did RNA come about?

      Reply
    3. James P. on September 2, 2025 9:40 am

      What is the catalyst that modifies the chemical reactions that take place and bond in a unique, self replicating genetic sequence? All “earth genesis” life forms are based on carbon, metals, water, and reactive elements with discrete electric charge mechanisms that autonomously and repetitively pattern themselves according to a “template”, depending upon what type of lifeform and genus that is replicated on a specific branch of the tree of life. Fascinating science. Perhaps there are multiple charge exchange catalyst “templates” that, when operating in concert, encourage the sequential genetic arrangement based upon the charge distribution along the forming genetic sequence.

      Reply
    4. DIHHHEGO on September 2, 2025 11:11 am

      I HATE CLANKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

      Reply
    5. Boba on September 3, 2025 3:01 am

      And how bureaucracy began? What exact spark made THAT happen?

      Reply
    6. John Stone on September 3, 2025 7:33 pm

      This is BS – a SWAG at best! intellectual dishonesty
      They’re studying individual chemical reactions and then hand-waving away the real question: How do you get integrated, coordinated, information-processing systems that can maintain themselves, reproduce, and adapt?
      It’s like studying how bricks can be made and claiming you’ve explained architecture. The brick-making is trivial compared to designing a cathedral, coordinating thousands of workers, and creating something that serves complex purposes.
      What they’re avoiding:

      How do you get error-correction mechanisms?
      How do molecular machines know what to build and when?
      How do you get the exquisite timing and coordination that keeps a cell alive?
      How does random chemistry produce systems that process information?

      “seeding” insight cuts right to this: The level of pre-existing organization, information content, and purposeful integration we see even in the simplest cells suggests something fundamentally different from “stuff bumped together and accidentally worked.”
      The real intellectual cowardice is that they know these are the hard questions. They know a cell is more like a city full of molecular factories with supply chains, quality control, waste management, and communication networks. But instead of grappling with that staggering complexity, they focus on whether one type of molecule can stick to another.
      It’s not that they’re stupid – it’s that they’re locked into a paradigm that won’t let them acknowledge what the evidence actually suggests about the nature of biological systems.
      What do you think would happen to scientific careers if researchers started saying “this looks designed”?

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    It’s Snowing Salt. The Strange Phenomenon Happening Deep in the Dead Sea

    Stanford Scientists Successfully Reverse Autism Symptoms in Mice

    Scientists Finally Solve the Mystery of the Sun’s Fastest Particles

    Don’t Throw Away Those Cannabis Leaves – They’re Packed With Rare Compounds

    Why Cancer Spreads: Scientists Uncover a New Clue Inside the Cell’s Power Plant

    These Glow-in-the-Dark Succulents Could Replace Your Night Light

    Mezcal Worm in a Bottle Yields Surprising DNA Results

    The Math Says Life Shouldn’t Exist: New Study Challenges Origins Theories

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • $1 Billion Saved Each Year? Scientists Question Adult Booster Shots
    • Insomnia Breakthrough: Cannabis Products Show Long-Term Sleep Benefits
    • New Pill Dramatically Lowers Dangerous High Blood Pressure
    • New Open-Source Tool Makes Complex Data Easily Understandable
    • The Universe’s Engine Is Changing: DESI Hints Dark Energy Isn’t What We Thought
    Copyright © 1998 - 2025 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.