Chemists Reveal New Theory For How Life On Earth May Have Begun

Chemists Reveal How Life On Earth May Have Begun

Chemists at Scripps Research propose a new theory for the origin of life. Key reactions for life today could have occurred on Earth four billion years ago, according to their experiments, challenging the idea of life arriving from comets or meteorites.

Chemists at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have developed a fascinating new theory for how life on Earth may have begun. Their experiments, described today in the journal Nature Communications, demonstrate that key chemical reactions that support life today could have been carried out with ingredients likely present on the planet four billion years ago.

“This was a black box for us,” said Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, Ph.D., associate professor of chemistry at TSRI and senior author of the new study. “But if you focus on the chemistry, the questions of origins of life become less daunting.”

For the new study, Krishnamurthy and his coauthors, who are all members of the National Science Foundation/National Aeronautics and Space Administration Center for Chemical Evolution, focused on a series of chemical reactions that make up what researchers refer to as the citric acid cycle.

Every aerobic organism, from flamingoes to fungi, relies on the citric acid cycle to release stored energy in cells. In previous studies, researchers imagined early life using the same molecules for the citric acid cycle as life uses today. The problem with that approach, Krishnamurthy explains, is that these biological molecules are fragile and the chemical reactions used in the cycle would not have existed in the first billion years of Earth–the ingredients simply didn’t exist yet.

Leaders of the new study started with the chemical reactions first. They wrote the recipe and then determined which molecules present on early Earth could have worked as ingredients.

The new study outlines how two non-biological cycles–called the HKG cycle and the malonate cycle–could have come together to kick-start a crude version of the citric acid cycle. The two cycles use reactions that perform the same fundamental chemistry of a-ketoacids and b-ketoacids as in the citric acid cycle. These shared reactions include aldol additions, which bring new source molecules into the cycles, as well as beta and oxidative decarboxylations, which release the molecules as carbon dioxide (CO2).

As they ran these reactions, the researchers found they could produce amino acids in addition to CO2, which are also the end products of the citric acid cycle. The researchers think that as biological molecules like enzymes became available, they could have led to the replacement of non-biological molecules in these fundamental reactions to make them more elaborate and efficient.

“The chemistry could have stayed the same over time, it was just the nature of the molecules that changed,” says Krishnamurthy. “The molecules evolved to be more complicated over time based on what biology needed.”

“Modern metabolism has a precursor, a template, that was non-biological,” adds Greg Springsteen, Ph.D., first author of the new study and associate professor of chemistry at Furman University.

Making these reactions even more plausible is the fact that at the center of these reactions is a molecule called glyoxylate, which studies show could have been available on early Earth and is part of the citric acid cycle today (called the “Glyoxylate shunt or cycle”).

Krishnamurthy says more research needs to be done to see how these chemical reactions could have become as sustainable as the citric acid cycle is today.

Reference: “Linked Cycles of Oxidative Decarboxylation of Glyoxylate as Protometabolic Analogs of the Citric Acid Cycle” by Greg Springsteen, Jayasudhan Reddy Yerabolu, Julia Nelson, Chandler Joel Rhea and Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, 8 January 2018, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02591-0

2 Comments on "Chemists Reveal New Theory For How Life On Earth May Have Begun"

  1. Top scientists, and they don’t have a CLUE. Life has to come from previous life. It is an unbroken chain. You can tweak it with CRISPR technology, but LIFE itself has to first be present.

    They mentally masturbate about all the citric acid “Glyoxylate shunt” (blah, blah, whatever), that happened at the beginning of time.

    Though, this is just another THEORY. Period. They are still not being able to REPRODUCE LIFE from their special complex molecule SOUP. It just aint gonna happen.

  2. If life arose from any natural process, then it should not be too difficult for chemists to duplicate that process. Yet here we are, decades into chemical and genetic understanding, and life still has not been produced in the laboratory – an accomplishment that would bring world notoriety and fame. Life apparently is so much more than just a conglomeration of chemicals. It is a “force” which only the Giver of life can bestow.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.