Two NASA space telescopes have teamed up to identify, for the first time, the detailed chemical “fingerprint” of a planet between the sizes of Earth and Neptune. No planets like this can be found in our own solar system, but they are common around other stars.
The planet, Gliese 3470 b (also known as GJ 3470 b), maybe a cross between Earth and Neptune, with a large rocky core buried under a deep crushing hydrogen and helium atmosphere. Weighing in at 12.6 Earth masses, the planet is more massive than Earth but less massive than Neptune (which is more than 17 Earth masses).
Many similar worlds have been discovered by NASA’s Kepler space observatory, whose mission ended in 2018. In fact, 80% of the planets in our galaxy may fall into this mass range. However, astronomers have never been able to understand the chemical nature of such a planet until now, researchers say.
By inventorying the contents of GJ 3470 b’s atmosphere, astronomers are able to uncover clues about the planet’s nature and origin.
“This is a big discovery from the planet formation perspective. The planet orbits very close to the star and is far less massive than Jupiter—318 times Earth’s mass—but has managed to accrete the primordial hydrogen/helium atmosphere that is largely “unpolluted” by heavier elements,” said Björn Benneke of the University of Montreal, Canada. “We don’t have anything like this in the solar system, and that’s what makes it striking.”
Astronomers enlisted the combined multi-wavelength capabilities of NASA’s Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes to do the first-of-a-kind study of GJ 3470 b’s atmosphere.
This was accomplished by measuring the absorption of starlight as the planet passed in front of its star (transit) and the loss of reflected light from the planet as it passed behind the star (eclipse). All totaled, the space telescopes observed 12 transits and 20 eclipses. The science of analyzing chemical fingerprints based on light is called “spectroscopy.”
“For the first time we have a spectroscopic signature of such a world,” said Benneke. But he is at a loss for classification: Should it be called a “super-Earth” or “sub-Neptune?” Or perhaps something else?
Fortuitously, the atmosphere of GJ 3470 b turned out to be mostly clear, with only thin hazes, enabling the scientists to probe deep into the atmosphere.
“We expected an atmosphere strongly enriched in heavier elements like oxygen and carbon which are forming abundant water vapor and methane gas, similar to what we see on Neptune”, said Benneke. “Instead, we found an atmosphere that is so poor in heavy elements that its composition resembles the hydrogen/helium-rich composition of the Sun.”
Other exoplanets called “hot Jupiters” are thought to form far from their stars, and over time migrate much closer. But this planet seems to have formed just where it is today, says Benneke.
The most plausible explanation, according to Benneke, is that GJ 3470 b was born precariously close to its red dwarf star, which is about half the mass of our Sun. He hypothesizes that essentially it started out as a dry rock, and rapidly accreted hydrogen from a primordial disk of gas when its star was very young. The disk is called a “protoplanetary disk.”
“We’re seeing an object that was able to accrete hydrogen from the protoplanetary disk, but didn’t run away to become a hot Jupiter,” said Benneke. “This is an intriguing regime.”
One explanation is that the disk dissipated before the planet could bulk up further. “The planet got stuck being a sub-Neptune,” said Benneke.
NASA’s upcoming James Webb Space Telescope will be able to probe even deeper into GJ 3470 b’s atmosphere thanks to Webb’s unprecedented sensitivity in the infrared. The new results have already spawned large interest in American and Canadian teams developing the instruments on Webb. They will observe the transits and eclipses of GJ 3470 b at light wavelengths where the atmospheric hazes become increasingly transparent.
The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) in Baltimore, Maryland, conducts Hubble science operations. STScI is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy in Washington, D.C.
The Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington, D.C. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at Caltech in Pasadena. Space operations are based at Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colorado. Data are archived at the Infrared Science Archive housed at IPAC at Caltech. Caltech manages JPL for NASA.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
5 Comments
Thanks God that over the decades humanity has come around to a consenses on “the known universe” from the past more arrogant “we are at the very edge of the universe” determination.
Whether it is the Kepler, Hubble, Spitzer or the prospective James Webb telescopes; as the newer ones kick in our conception of the universal horizon keeps on expanding.
Perhaps God wants our often atheistic scientific communities to ponder such an expanding universe and analyse why it grows thus ?; why some mere dried rock via “natural” accretion become stable exoplanets yet other similar rocks again “naturally” go rogue and become Hot Jupiters instead ?
When mere human powers can have Grand Designs in their efforts to have a global order; can’t Almighty God too have a Grand Design to order the humanly unfathomable Universe ?
Why should we alleged scientist rush to deny such an universe an underlying grand design and/or the presence ultimately of a Grand Designer, i.e.: GOD himself ? ? ?
sure. But you cant prove it.
Quit complaining.
The same applies in your case too. But you don’t have to STOP complaining, for that is at the very core of, at least, the atheistic, if not also the Islamic, scientific spirit !
So, just keep up questioning, continue to scrutinize the apparently endless universe and please scientifically PROVE that there is no God, instead of prematurely jumping unscientifically to the conclusion that God doesn’t exist, even before your scrutiny exhaust the entire Universe !
So,Anthony Wing just be patient and keep complaining BUT only scientifically ! Bye ! !
The proof should be on the one who makes the claim
Sonny. Sorry, at least from the early 1970s the mainly atheistic scientific community has claimed to be at the very edge of the universe and vainly trying to PROVE it and worse refuses to acknowledge its infiniteness.
The Infinite Almighty is challenging finite humanity to merely attempt to understand, leave alone prove, HIS existence through the vastness of the physical universe and the cohesiveness of human rationality ! !