Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Earth»“Much More Widespread Than We Thought” – Unexpected Methane Emissions Challenge Climate Change Models
    Earth

    “Much More Widespread Than We Thought” – Unexpected Methane Emissions Challenge Climate Change Models

    By University of Copenhagen - Faculty of ScienceMarch 27, 20242 Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Glaciers in the Westcanadian Yukon
    A researcher from the University of Copenhagen found unexpectedly high levels of methane in the meltwater of three Canadian glaciers, challenging existing beliefs about glacial methane emissions. These findings suggest that methane production beneath glaciers is more widespread than previously thought, raising important questions about carbon cycling in glaciated regions and their impact on climate change. Credit: Sarah Elise Sapper

    Global warming is unlocking methane reserves, the size of which remains uncertain. A young researcher at the University of Copenhagen found significant amounts of this potent greenhouse gas in meltwater from three Canadian mountain glaciers, previously thought to be methane-free zones. This discovery introduces new uncertainties into our knowledge of methane emissions from the world’s glacier-covered areas.

    The helicopter’s rotor blades spin as its skillful pilot performs aerial acrobatics between the steep Yukon mountain sides where PhD student Sarah Elise Sapper is leading her first field expedition deep into the heart of the mountains of northwestern Canada. From the helicopter windows, her eyes fall on the jagged edge of the Donjek glacier: meltwater swirls out from beneath the ice like a whirlpool.

    Soon after landing, it becomes apparent that Sarah has stumbled upon an unusual find on the first attempt. Seconds after starting up her portable methane analyzer it is clear that the air is enriched with methane and the culprit is soon found. Collecting a sample of meltwater, she measures concentrations of methane that far exceed expectations.

    “We expected to find low values in the meltwater because it is believed that glacial methane emissions require larger ice masses such as vast ice sheets. But the result was quite the opposite. We measured concentrations up to 250 times higher than those in our atmosphere,” explains Sarah Elise Sapper of the University of Copenhagen’s Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management.

    The field party lifted off and continued to two more mountain glaciers, Kluane and Dusty. And after measuring the methane in the meltwater of each of those two glaciers, the preliminary finding turned out to be more than an anomaly. Here too, measurements showed high methane concentrations. Somewhere beneath the ice, there are previously unknown sources of the gas.

    Demonstrates possibility of widespread methane emissions

    “The finding is surprising and raises several important questions within this area of research,” says Associate Professor Jesper Riis Christiansen of the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management.

    Christiansen, the research article’s co-author, believes that the finding demonstrates the possibility of methane being present beneath many of the world’s glaciers, ones that have thus far been written off.

    “When we suddenly see that even mountain glaciers, which are small in comparison with an ice sheet, are able to form and emit methane, it expands our basic understanding of carbon cycling in extreme environments on the planet. The formation and release of methane under ice is more comprehensive and much more widespread than we thought,” he says.

    Sarah Elise Sapper Guides Helicopter Glacier
    Sarah Elise Sapper directed the helicopter pilot to land close to the glacier edge to measure the methane in whirlpools of meltwater streaming out. Credit: Sarah Elise Sapper

    Until now, the prevailing view has been that methane in meltwater could only be found in oxygen-free environments under large masses of ice like the Greenland Ice Sheet.

    The researchers assume that the production of methane is biological and happens when an organic carbon source – e.g., deposits from prehistoric marine organisms, soils, peat, or forests – is decomposed by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen, such as we know from wetlands. As such, it is surprising that the mountain glaciers emit methane.

    “The meltwater from the surface of glaciers is oxygen-rich when it travels to the bottom of the ice. So we found it quite surprising that all this oxygen is used up somewhere along the way, so that oxygen-free environments form underneath these mountain glaciers. And even more surprising that it happens to such a degree, that microbes start producing methane and we can observe these high methane concentrations in the water flowing out at the glacier edges” states Sarah Elise Sapper.

    “Sarah’s findings change our basic understanding and send us back to the drawing board in relation to some of the key mechanisms at play,” adds Jesper Riis Christiansen.

    An uncertain role for the climate of the future

    According to the researchers, the findings in Canada do not immediately spur an increased concern in relation to their effect on climate change. However, that conclusion may be temporary.

    “Methane plays a major role in warming our planet. The challenge with methane is that it is a super-potent greenhouse gas and increasing emissions will accelerate climate warming. From a global perspective, we can measure how much is emitted into the atmosphere and, roughly speaking, where the methane comes from, using the isotopes found in the atmospheric methane. And for now, the contribution of methane from ice-covered regions on our planet, including ice sheets and glaciers, isn’t increasing,” explains Jesper Riis Christiansen.

    However, he emphasizes that the measurements cannot distinguish between methane from glaciated regions and methane from wetlands. Therefore, the numbers could be deceiving. And, the effect of melting remains unknown.

    Jesper Riis Christiansen believes that the findings demand vigilance.

    “The three sites Sarah measured were randomly selected due to the availability of a research station and helicopter, yet methane was found in all three. In itself, that is a good reason to better understand the area. There’s too much that we don’t know, and the melting glaciers expose unknown environments that have remained hidden for thousands of years. In reality, no one knows how emissions will behave,” says Jesper Riis Christiansen.

    He hopes that a better understanding of methane behavior beneath glaciers will also help researchers better understand the mechanisms at play when wetlands release methane, and thereby contribute to the development of solutions to remove methane from the atmosphere through oxidation – e.g., through the use of certain soil types.

    Reference: “Methane emissions from subglacial meltwater of three alpine glaciers in Yukon, Canada” by Sarah Elise Sapper, Christian Juncher Jørgensen, Moritz Schroll, Frank Keppler and Jesper Riis Christiansen, 12 December 2023, Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research.
    DOI: 10.1080/15230430.2023.2284456

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Climate Change Glacier Methane University of Copenhagen
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Scientists Just Turned Dusty Navy Photos Into a Climate Time Bomb

    Unprecedented Glacial Flood Unleashes 3,000 Billion Liters of Water in East Greenland

    Challenging Modern Climate Narratives: Forgotten 1937 Aerial Photos Expose Antarctic Anomaly

    Ice in Crisis: Greenland Glaciers Melting 5x Faster Than 20 Years Ago

    Solving a 20-Year Old Puzzle: Sahara Dust and Its Impact on Climate Change

    Arctic’s Melting Glaciers Reveal Hidden Methane Time Bomb

    Rapidly Retreating Glacial Ice Leaves Species Threatened

    Research Shows Roughly 150 Billion Tons of Ice Lost Annually

    Researchers Study the Link Between Gas Hydrates and Climate Warming

    2 Comments

    1. Clyde Spencer on March 28, 2024 10:26 am

      “Methane plays a major role in warming our planet.”

      Not really! The concentration of CO2 is currently about 425 parts per million (PPM) and increasing at a rate of 2-3 PPM annually. The concentration of methane (CH4) is about 2 PPM and is only increasing at a rate of about 0.01 PPM annually. While it is true that CH4 has a greater warming potential than CO2, what is rarely mentioned is that the claimed 28-32X 100-year potential is for EQUAL weights of methane and CO2. However, they do not have equal molecular weights. When adjusted for molecular weight and expressed in the units that are used for measuring concentration and flux, 1 PPM of CH4 only has a warming potential about 10X that of 1 PPM of CO2. That is, CH4 has a warming potential equivalent to less than 20 PPM CO2 out of a total of about 425 PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere and is increasing at an equivalent CO2 rate of about 0.1 PPM annually. (I won’t get into the issue of the location of the spectral absorption features in CO2 and methane with respect to water vapor here.) Suffice it to say that claiming that methane, with a life-time of about a decade, does not fit my definition of a “major” influence on global radiative forcing.

      The question that should be asked is, “Is this typical exaggerations of the situation a reflection of incompetence, or a willful distortion of facts to advance a political agenda?” It seems unlikely that all researchers are incompetent. Either way, the public is all too frequently being misinformed about an important subject.

      https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/03/06/the-misguided-crusade-to-reduce-anthropogenic-methane-emissions/

      Reply
    2. Clyde Spencer on March 28, 2024 10:36 am

      An important point to be made is that we have a pretty good handle on the concentration and annual increase in methane concentration — we just may not have the sources properly identified.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    The Universe Is Expanding Too Fast and Scientists Can’t Explain Why

    “Like Liquid Metal”: Scientists Create Strange Shape-Shifting Material

    Early Warning Signals of Esophageal Cancer May Be Hiding in Plain Sight

    Common Blood Pressure Drug Shows Surprising Power Against Deadly Antibiotic-Resistant Superbug

    Scientists Uncover Dangerous Connection Between Serotonin and Heart Valve Disease

    Scientists Discover a “Protector” Protein That Could Help Reverse Hair Loss

    Bone-Strengthening Discovery Could Reverse Osteoporosis

    Scientists Uncover Hidden Trigger Behind Stem Cell Aging

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • A Common Diabetes Drug May Hold the Key to Stopping HIV From Coming Back
    • Ancient “Syphilis-Like” Disease in Vietnam Challenges Key Scientific Assumptions
    • Drinking Alcohol To Cope in Your 20s Could Damage Your Brain for Life
    • Scientists Crack Alfalfa’s Chromosome Mystery After Decades of Debate
    • Ancient Ant-Plant Alliance Collapses As Predatory Wasps Move In
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.