A Multiverse – where our Universe is only one of many – might not be as inhospitable to life as previously thought, according to new research.
Questions about whether other universes might exist as part of a larger Multiverse, and if they could harbor life, are burning issues in modern cosmology.
Now new research led by Durham University, UK, and Australia’s University of Sydney, Western Sydney University, and the University of Western Australia, has shown that life could potentially be common throughout the Multiverse, if it exists.
The key to this, the researchers say, is dark energy, a mysterious “force” that is accelerating the expansion of the Universe.
Simulations of the formation of structure in an expanding universe, featuring a universe with no cosmological constant/dark energy (left), a universe with 10 times more dark energy than in our universe (center), and a universe with a very large cosmological constant/dark energy, 100 times more than in our universe (right). In the color scheme, blue colors represent high density regions of the universe where stars are forming, and red, low-density. The simulations run for approximately 14 billion years. All models use the same initial conditions after the big bang. At early times, the Universe was very hot and dense. Gravity pulls matter together to form structure, while the rapid expansion caused by dark energy dilutes all matter as the Universe ages, halting star formation. Credit: Jaime Salcido/EAGLE
Scientists say that current theories of the origin of the Universe predict much more dark energy in our Universe than is observed. Adding larger amounts would cause such a rapid expansion that it would dilute matter before any stars, planets or life could form.
The Multiverse theory, introduced in the 1980s, can explain the “luckily small” amount of dark energy in our Universe that enabled it to host life, among many universes that could not.
Using huge computer simulations of the cosmos, the new research has found that adding dark energy, up to a few hundred times the amount observed in our Universe, would actually have a modest impact upon star and planet formation.
This opens up the prospect that life could be possible throughout a wider range of other universes, if they exist, the researchers said.
The findings are published in two related papers in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
The simulations were produced under the EAGLE (Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) project – one of the most realistic simulations of the observed Universe.
Simulations of the formation of a group of galaxies in an expanding universe, featuring no cosmological constant (left) and a very large cosmological constant (right). In the color scheme, lighter colors represent denser parts of the universe, when gravity is drawing matter together into galaxies. The simulation runs for 15 billion years. Without a cosmological constant (left), matter comes together under the attractive force of gravity into smaller galaxies, which combine into a large galaxy. With a large cosmological constant (right), the faster expansion of the universe stops matter from grouping together, and galaxies fail to form. Credit: Luke A. Barnes, Pascal J. Elahi, Jaime Salcido, Richard G. Bower, Geraint F. Lewis/EAGLE
Jaime Salcido, a postgraduate student in Durham University’s Institute for Computational Cosmology, said: “For many physicists, the unexplained but seemingly special amount of dark energy in our Universe is a frustrating puzzle.
“Our simulations show that even if there was much more dark energy or even very little in the Universe then it would only have a minimal effect on star and planet formation, raising the prospect that life could exist throughout the Multiverse.”
Dr. Luke Barnes, a John Templeton Research Fellow at Western Sydney University, said: “The Multiverse was previously thought to explain the observed value of dark energy as a lottery – we have a lucky ticket and live in the Universe that forms beautiful galaxies which permit life as we know it.
“Our work shows that our ticket seems a little too lucky, so to speak. It’s more special than it needs to be for life. This is a problem for the Multiverse; a puzzle remains.”
Dr. Pascal Elahi, Research Fellow at the University of Western Australia, said: “We asked ourselves how much dark energy can there be before life is impossible? Our simulations showed that the accelerated expansion driven by dark energy has hardly any impact on the birth of stars, and hence places for life to arise. Even increasing dark energy many hundreds of times might not be enough to make a dead universe.”
However, the researchers said their results were unexpected and could be problematic as they cast doubt on the ability of the theory of a Multiverse to explain the observed value of dark energy.
According to the research, if we live in a Multiverse, we’d expect to observe much more dark energy than we do – perhaps 50 times more than we see in our Universe.
Although the results do not rule out the Multiverse, it seems that the tiny amount of dark energy in our Universe would be better explained by an, as yet, undiscovered law of nature.
New law of physics
Professor Richard Bower, in Durham University’s Institute for Computational Cosmology, said: “The formation of stars in a universe is a battle between the attraction of gravity, and the repulsion of dark energy.
“We have found in our simulations that universes with much more dark energy than ours can happily form stars. So why such a paltry amount of dark energy in our Universe?
“I think we should be looking for a new law of physics to explain this strange property of our Universe, and the Multiverse theory does little to rescue physicists’ discomfort.”
The research was conducted with Liverpool John Moores University, UK, and Leiden University, The Netherlands.
It was funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK, the European Research Council, The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, the John Templeton Foundation, the International Center for Radio Astronomy Research, and Australian Research Council Center of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D).
- “The impact of dark energy on galaxy formation. What does the future of our Universe hold?” by Jaime Salcido, Richard G Bower, Luke A Barnes, Geraint F Lewis, Pascal J Elahi, Tom Theuns, Matthieu Schaller, Robert A Crain and Joop Schaye, 10 April 2018, MNRAS.
- “Galaxy formation efficiency and the multiverse explanation of the cosmological constant with EAGLE simulations” by Luke A Barnes, Pascal J Elahi, Jaime Salcido, Richard G Bower, Geraint F Lewis, Tom Theuns, Matthieu Schaller, Robert A Crain and Joop Schaye, 6 April 2018, MNRAS.
Hi guys ,
What you call an ” mysterious force ” , was ” The Cosmic Intelligent Mind ” by Max Planck in 1944 !
thanks , Peter
It seems like us humans desperately want to believe that the universe is a really great ‘Star Trek’ place that’s literally teeming with life.
Many planets orbiting in the ‘Goldilocks Zone’ of other star systems. Though still not one shred of definitive spectrographic proof of any life, other than here on Earth, has ever been found.
For instance, there’s the theory that the Octopus came from outer space, If this is true, then the universe should be already filled with life. It’s either one way or the other.
So then, if the Universe is ‘teeming with life’, let’s discuss the FERMI paradox, shall we? Because it’s become quite the lucrative endeavor, for NASA to keep ‘$earching for life out there in the vast cosmos.
But then again, could this mystery called ‘LIFE’, which we take for granted here upon this ‘pale blue dot’, actually be extremely rare in the universe…as in nonexistent? And, that all ‘life’ must come from a previous life… which comes from an origin of all life…located where?.
And where does ‘consciousness’ fit into the equation? Because without it, what difference does any of it make?
Though, perhaps one may believe instead that ‘life’ just spontaneously erupts on a particular planet? Like on ‘Pandora’, in the movie ‘Avatar’, since it’s orbiting in the Goldilocks Zone of that star, where water becomes liquid? It just sort of starts to appear, and form itself out of the chaos of a molecular soup?
Or maybe that ‘spores’ have seeded the universe over billions of years stretch of time, and that one containing an Octopus, just so happened to ‘catch’ on this particular planet?
(Though, once again the FERMI Paradox rears its ugly head.)
Could it be more likely that the ‘star trek’ version of reality that we’ve been indoctrinated with since our youth, like a good religion, be just another type of media brainwashing?
And that being ‘alone’ in the universe, really isn’t such a bad thing after all?
please read John c Lilly’s research talking about quantum universes