Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Science»NOAA Determines Radiation Risk of Underwater Aircraft Carrier
    Science

    NOAA Determines Radiation Risk of Underwater Aircraft Carrier

    By Kate Greene, Berkeley LabJuly 8, 20151 Comment4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Determining Radiation Safety for Sunken-Ship Archaeology
    An image of the USS Independence from the Coda Octopus Echoscope 3D sonar, which was integrated on the Boeing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) Echo Ranger. Credit: NOAA and Coda Octopus

    A team of researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration rediscovered the scuttled USS Independence, determining the radiation risk of exploring the underwater aircraft carrier.

    About 42 miles (68 kilometers) southwest of San Francisco and 2,600 feet (800 meters) underwater sits the USS Independence, a bombed-out relic from World War II. The aircraft carrier was a target ship in atomic weapon tests at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands during the war. Then, in 1951, it was loaded up with 55-gallon (208-liter) drums of low-level radioactive waste and scuttled just south of the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge off the California coast.

    Earlier this year, the USS Independence was rediscovered by a team of researchers led by James Delgado, the director of Maritime Heritage at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The marine archaeologists used sonar from an autonomous submarine to find the wreckage, but with the ship’s radioactive past, the scientists wondered how safe it would be to actually explore.

    Delgado turned to Berkeley Lab’s Kai Vetter to better understand the radiation hazards. Vetter is the head of applied nuclear physics at Berkeley Lab, nuclear engineering professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and the co-founder of the Institute for Resilient Communities. “They wanted to know if we could ensure the safety of their equipment,” says Vetter, “and to see if you’d pick up contamination if you went down there.”

    The short answer, Vetter says, was that neither the submersible nor the team was ever in danger of contamination.

    One reason is that water is an excellent radiation shield. Under water, radiation will only extend several inches from contaminated materials, says Vetter. The unmanned research submarine stayed at least 100 feet (30 meters) away from the wreck.

    Another reason has to do with the size of the contaminated site with respect to the size of the ocean. While contaminated rust particles from the ship are released and transported by water, the dilution factor of the ocean is enormous, essentially nullifying any radioactive effect.

    USS Independence at Anchor in San Francisco Bay
    Aerial view of ex-USS Independence at anchor in San Francisco Bay, California, January 1951. There is visible damage from the atomic bomb tests at Bikini Atoll. Credit: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park

    Relatedly, while a relatively small number of organisms close to the wreck might take up some of these rust particles, the effects of radioactivity are diluted through the food chain because the number of organisms exposed is so small. In contrast, mercury is much more prevalent and widely distributed in the ocean, and this is why its concentration builds up the food chain.

    And finally, says Vetter, it’s important to consider the half-life of the radioactive materials. In this case, the isotopes of concern are cesium 137 and strontium 90, which both have a half-life of about 30 years. This means that after 30 years, half the isotopes responsible for the initial contamination transmute into other non-radioactive isotopes. It’s been over 60 years since the USS Independence was scuttled, which means that less than a quarter of the initial radioactive isotopes remain.

    Still, to demonstrate with data, Vetter brought a team of researchers and students to the harbor in Half Moon Bay, CA to test the submersible after it had captured sonar images of the aircraft carrier. Armed with instruments called dosimeters that pick up ionizing radiation, the researchers found no evidence of contamination on the submersible. It wasn’t a surprise, says Vetter, since the craft never got close enough to the ship and even if it had, the contamination would have diluted away as it was tugged back to shore.

    The NOAA expedition collected its sonar images from a distance, but Vetter hopes to someday work with a submersible that gets an up-close view of the ship, the 55-gallon (208-liter) barrels, and the radioactivity. Such a project would require a specially designed detector to read the radiation on site, Vetter explains. “It would be exciting to build a dedicated system with some advanced technologies to figure out what is sitting down there in that old vessel,” he says.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory NOAA Nuclear Radiation
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Defects Deliver the Best of Both Worlds: Highly Efficient Ultrahigh Energy Density Capacitor

    Beneficial Radiation? Engineers Surprised to Find That Radiation Can Slow Corrosion

    Laser and Biology Experts Combine Efforts to Study Viruses in Droplets

    Global Famine Predicted in Even a Limited India-Pakistan Nuclear War Due to Soot and Firestorms

    Illuminating Seafloor Seismology With Existing ‘Dark’ Fiber-Optic Cables and Distributed Acoustic Sensing

    When Solids and Liquids Meet: In Nanoscale Detail

    Scientists Use X-Rays and Infrared Light to Explore Egyptian Mummy Bones [Video]

    Leaks and Contaminated Sediments Keep Radiation Near Fukushima High

    Likelihood of Nuclear Accident 200 Times Greater than Previously Thought

    1 Comment

    1. Brian Priest on July 9, 2015 4:54 am

      NOAA Determines Radiation Risk of Underwater Aircraft Carrier

      Read this article with interest. Does the results mean that the present day nuclear Subs could be scuttled without any apparent risk to anyone or thing?

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    “I Couldn’t Do It Anymore” – Antarctic Guides Quit Their Dream Jobs After Witnessing Tourism’s Damage

    Scientists Say Eating Less Protein May Help You Live Longer

    Scientists Solve a Long-Standing Mystery About Bird and Dinosaur Eggs

    Belly Fat and Low Vitamin D May More Than Double the Risk of Early Death

    Lost in Space: Rare Cosmic Flare Exposes a Wandering Black Hole Far From Its Galaxy’s Center

    Dark Matter May Be Leaving a Signal in Earth’s Atmosphere

    Scientists Discover a 300-Million-Year-Old Geological Time Capsule Inside Fossilized Wood

    Oral Weight Loss Pill Helps Patients Lose up to 12% of Body Weight

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Industrial Chicken Farming Is Supercharging the Spread of a Dangerous Foodborne Bacterium
    • Honeybee Queens May Pass Toxic Chemicals to the Next Generation
    • This Common Amino Acid May Help the Body Fight Cancer and Viruses
    • Schizophrenia’s Brain Damage May Start in One Key Region
    • A Simple Treatment Could Save Extremely Premature Babies From Blindness
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.