
Quantum chaos, previously theoretical, has been observed experimentally, validating a 40-year-old theory about electrons forming patterns in confined spaces.
Using advanced imaging techniques on graphene, researchers confirmed “quantum scars,” where electrons follow unique closed orbits. These findings could revolutionize electronics by enabling efficient, low-power transistors and paving the way for novel quantum control methods. This discovery offers insights into chaotic quantum systems, bridging a gap between classical and quantum physics.
Patterns in Chaos Revealed in Quantum Space
Where can patterns emerge from chaos? This question has been answered in the incredibly tiny quantum realm by an international research team co-led by UC Santa Cruz physicist Jairo Velasco, Jr. In a study published on November 27 in Nature, the researchers confirmed a 40-year-old theory suggesting that electrons confined within quantum spaces follow predictable paths rather than creating a random jumble of trajectories.
Electrons are unique because they exhibit both particle and wave-like properties. Unlike a ball rolling predictably, their behavior is often counterintuitive. Under specific conditions, the wave-like nature of electrons can cause interference, concentrating their movement into distinct patterns. Physicists refer to these common paths as “unique closed orbits.”

Advanced Imaging Techniques in Quantum Research
Achieving this in Velasco’s lab required an intricate combination of advanced imaging techniques and precise control over electron behavior within graphene, a material widely used in research because its unique properties and two-dimensional structure make it ideal for observing quantum effects. In their experiment, Velasco’s team utilized the finely tipped probe of a scanning tunneling microscope to first create a trap for electrons, and then hover close to a graphene surface to detect electron movements without physically disturbing them.
The benefit of electrons following closed orbits within a confined space is that the subatomic particle’s property would be better preserved as it moves from one point to another, according to Velasco. He said this has vast implications for everyday electronics, explaining how information encoded in an electron’s properties could be transferred without loss, conceivably resulting in lower-power, highly efficient transistors.
“One of the most promising aspects of this discovery is its potential use in information processing,” Velasco said. “By slightly disturbing, or ‘nudging’ these orbits, electrons could travel predictably across a device, carrying information from one end to the other.”
A numerical simulation of the quantum dynamics accomplished in the team’s experiment. Credit: Anton Graf, Harvard University
Quantum Scars Make Their Mark
In physics, these unique electron orbits are known as “quantum scars.” This was first explained in a 1984 theoretical study by Harvard University physicist Eric Heller, who used computer simulations to reveal that confined electrons would move along high-density orbits if reinforced by their wave motions interfering with each other.
“Quantum scarring is not a curiosity. But rather, it is a window onto the strange quantum world,” said Heller, also a co-author on the paper. “Scarring is a localization around orbits that come back on themselves. These returns have no long-term consequence in our normal classical world—they are soon forgotten. But they are remembered forever in the quantum world.”
Harnessing Quantum Chaos
With Heller’s theory proven, researchers now have the empirical foundation needed to explore potential applications. Today’s transistors, already at the nanoelectronic scale, could become even more efficient by incorporating quantum scar-based designs, enhancing devices like computers, smartphones, and tablets, which rely on densely packed transistors to boost processing power.
“For future studies, we plan to build on our visualization of quantum scars to develop methods to harness and manipulate scar states,” Velasco said. “The harnessing of chaotic quantum phenomena could enable novel methods for selective and flexible delivery of electrons at the nanoscale—thus, innovating new modes of quantum control.”
Classical Chaos vs. Quantum Chaos
Velasco’s team employs a visual model often referred to as a “billiard” to illustrate the classical mechanics of linear versus chaotic systems. A billiard is a bounded area that reveals how particles inside move, and a common shape used in physics is called a “stadium,” where the ends are curved and the edges straight. In classical chaos, a particle would bounce around randomly and unpredictably—eventually covering the entire surface.
In this experiment, the team created a stadium billiard on atom-thin graphene that measured roughly 400 nanometers in length. Then, with the scanning tunneling microscope, they were able to observe quantum chaos in action: finally seeing with their own eyes the pattern of electron orbits within the stadium billiard they created in Velasco’s lab.
“I am very excited we successfully imaged quantum scars in a real quantum system,” said first and co-corresponding author Zhehao Ge, a UC Santa Cruz graduate student at the time of this study’s completion. “Hopefully, these studies will help us gain a deeper understanding of chaotic quantum systems.”
Reference: “Direct visualization of relativistic quantum scars in graphene quantum dots” by Zhehao Ge, Anton M. Graf, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, Sergey Slizovskiy, Peter Polizogopoulos, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Ryan Van Haren, David Lederman, Vladimir I. Fal’ko, Eric J. Heller and Jairo Velasco Jr, 27 November 2024, Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08190-6
Other co-authors on the paper include Peter Polizogopoulos, Ryan Van Haren, and David Lederman at UC Santa Cruz; Anton Graf and Joonas Keski-Rahkonen at Harvard; Sergey Slizovskiy and Vladimir Fal’ko at the University of Manchester; and Takashi Taniguchi and Kenji Watanabe, at Japan’s National Institute for Materials Science.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
18 Comments
Quantum machines are hoaxes. Science was hijacked in the early 20th century.
Huh??? Are you saying that you cannot observe and hold two apparently contradictory and mutually exclusive thoughts in your mind at one time, even for a moment?
This work recalls,recent discoveries on the shape of nucleus;alongwith the Thermodynamics – Quantum Mechanical Property Relationship and also the Principle.Here,in this experimental design of device,a close loop is found between initial and final point of operation.
This work recalls,recent discoveries on the shape of nucleus;alongwith the Thermodynamics – Quantum Mechanical Property Relationship and also the Principle.Here,in this experimental design of device,a close loop is found between initial and final point of operation.However,confirmed this manybody system is working from more model experimental designs,;are permitted for application in the
field of electronics for the real world.
I’m now 82.when our science teacher first displayed the double slot experiment, non of us were amazed.we should have been
It’s been a while since school. Very informative. I understand more than I did . I was gem hunting in North Carolina. Found quite a few interesting specimens. Black light brings out art or pics on some. Magnification, jewelers loop . I figure 3D holographic micro printing came from somewhere. Videos or movies in the stonesor gems . Look
Quantum chaos, previously theoretical, has been observed experimentally, validating a 40-year-old theory about electrons forming patterns in confined spaces.
VERY GOOD!
Scientific research guided by correct theories can help people avoid detours, failures, and exaggeration. The physical phenomena observed by researchers in experiments are always appearances, never the natural essence of things. The natural essence of things needs to be extracted and sublimated based on mathematical theories via appearances , rather than being imagined arbitrarily.
Everytime scientific revolution, the scientific research space brought by the new paradigm expands exponentially. Physics should not ignore the analyzable physical properties of topological vortices.
(1) Traditional physics: based on mathematical formalism, experimental verification and arbitrary imagination.
(2) Topological Vortex Theory (TVT): Although also based on mathematics (such as topology), it focuses more on non intuitive geometry and topological structures, challenging traditional physical intuition.
Topological Vortex Theory (TVT) points out the limitations of the Standard Model in describing the large-scale structure of the universe, proposes the need to consider non-standard model components such as dark matter and dark energy, and suggests that topological vortex fields may be key to understanding these phenomena. Topological vortex theory (TVT) heralds innovative technologies such as topological electronics, topological smart batteries, topological quantum computing, etc., which may bring low-energy electronic components, almost inexhaustible currents, and revolutionary computing platforms, etc.
Topology tells us that topological vortices and antivortices can form new spacetime structures via the synchronous effect of superposition, deflection, or twisting of them. Mathematics does not tell us that there must be God particles, ghost particles, fermions, or bosons present. When physics and mathematics diverge, arbitrary imagination will make physics no different from theology. Topological vortex research reflections on the philosophy and methodology of science help us understand the nature essence of science and the limitations of scientific methods. This not only has guiding significance for scientific research itself, but also has important implications for science education and popularization.
All things follow certain laws, which can be revealed through observation and research ( such as topological structures ). Today, so-called academic publications (such as PRL, Nature, Science, etc.) obstinately believe that two sets of cobalt 60 rotating in opposite directions can become two mirror images of each other. This is a public humiliation to the normal intelligence of the public. They conducted pseudo scientific research based on CP violations, published countless pseudo scientific papers, and received various awards. The so-called scientific evaluation system constructed based on these so-called academic publications opened the dirtiest, ugliest, and most evil era in the history of modern science. They hardly know what shame is.
Please witness the exemplary collaboration between theoretical physicists and experimentalists (https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/#comment-854286). It is normal to make mistakes in scientific research, but what is abnormal is to stubbornly adhere to erroneous positions and not repent.
Let us continue to witness via facts the dirtiest and ugliest era in the history of sciences and humanities in human society. The laws of nature will not change due to misleading of certain so-called academic publications or endorsements from certain so-called scientific awards.
As some comments have stated ( https://scitechdaily.com/super-photons-unveiled-sculpting-light-into-unbreakable-communication-networks/#comment-861546 ): Fortunately, we have enough pieces to put the puzzle together properly, and there are folks who have chosen to forego today’s societal structures in order to do exactly that.
Additionally, some comments have stated ( https://scitechdaily.com/science-made-simple-what-is-nuclear-fission/#comment-862083 ): You have been spewing this type of nonsensical word salad for several years now. Outrage doesn’t equal competence. If anything, your inability to convince anyone is a sign of your incompetence. Ask the commenter:Today, so-called official (such as PRL, Nature, Science, etc.) in physics stubbornly believes that two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions can become two sets of objects that mirror each other, and it even won awards. These so-called academic publications blatantly talk nonsense. Do you think this is human misfortune or personal misfortune?
Isn’t this the evil consequence of the Physics Review family misleading science? Academic circle is not Entertainment industry. Have some people really never know what shame is?
Flat earther and space denier no doubt.
The beautiful earth is our human home. Although there are many aspects that may cause harm to humanity, natural laws can only be utilized by humans and cannot be changed. Regarding space, if you are interested, you can browse https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/695926158.
I hope you haven’t been fooled or brainwashed by so-called academic publications (such as PRL, Nature, Science, etc.).
Enjoy your every day.
Say ‘topological ‘ again it’s hilarious
VERY GOOD!!!
Hilarious is the persistence of truth, the pursuit of science, and the helplessness towards reality.
“Electrons are unique because they exhibit both particle and wave-like properties.” Unique??? This is true of all or nature’s building blocks. Name one that doesn’t exhibit both particle and wave-like properties.
*of, not or
The author is a university media-comms manager with literally zero physics in his LinkedIn profile. That bit of nonsense stuck out to me like a sore thumb, and there are other bumps in the expositional road. I suspect this was worked up from a chatGPT draft.
SciTech has added a Midjourney/DALL-E fancy ‘illustration’ thumbnail (top image) for media clickbait purposes that doesn’t map in the least into the stadium/scar experimental environment and outcome.
Numerical simulation video suggests (close to) planar orbitals.
Paywall free preprint:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.10675
Is a lot of the hype about AI “the king’s new clothes”
This is just the 3D visualization of the movement in 4 dimensions.