Bursting the Hubble Bubble: Powerful Ground-Based Telescope Will See Further and Clearer Than Hubble Space Telescope

This computer model shows how MAVIS will look on the instrument platform of VLT Unit Telescope 4 (Yepun) at ESO’s Paranal Observatory. The boxes indicate the various submodules of the instrument. Credit: Macquarie University

Australian scientists will help construct one of the world’s most powerful ground-based telescopes that promises to see further and clearer than the Hubble Space Telescope and unlock mysteries of the early Universe.

The team will develop a new, world-first instrument that will produce images three times sharper than Hubble under the multimillion-dollar project.

The MAVIS instrument will be fitted to one of the eight-meter Unit Telescopes at the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO’s) Very Large Telescope in Chile, to remove blurring from telescope images caused by turbulence in Earth’s atmosphere. MAVIS will be built over seven years at a cost of $57 million.

MAVIS stands for MCAO Assisted Visible Imager and Spectrograph. MCAO stands for Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics.

The MAVIS consortium is led by The Australian National University (ANU), and involves Macquarie University, Italy’s National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), and France’s Laboratoire d’Astrophysique (LAM).

MAVIS Principal Investigator Professor François Rigaut, from the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, said atmospheric turbulence is like the phenomenon of objects appearing blurry on the horizon during a hot day.

“MAVIS will remove this blurring and deliver images as sharp as if the telescope were in space, helping us to peer back into the early Universe by pushing the cosmic frontier of what is visible,” he said.

“The ability to deliver corrected optical images, over a wide field of view using one of the world’s largest telescope, is what makes MAVIS a first-of-its kind instrument, and means we will be able to observe very faint, distant objects.

“We will be able to use the new technology to explore how the first stars formed 13 billion years ago, as well as how weather changes on planets and moons in our Solar System.”

Associate Professor Richard McDermid, the MAVIS project scientist based at Macquarie University, said the project represents a significant milestone for Australia’s growing relationship with ESO, and the nation’s space research and work.

“MAVIS demonstrates that Australia can not only participate in the scientific life of the observatory, but can also be a core player in helping ESO maintain its leadership by developing unique and competitive instruments using Australian expertise,” he said.

Professor Matthew Colless, Director of the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, said the coming decade represents a very exciting time for astronomy.

“ESO and Australia entered a 10-year strategic partnership in 2017, a partnership that the Australian astronomy community has embraced with enthusiasm,” he said.

“In return for building MAVIS, the consortium will get guaranteed observing time with the instrument, as well as a financial contribution from ESO for its hardware.

“From space, with the likes of the James Webb Space Telescope, and with ground-based facilities such as ESO’s Extremely Large Telescope, astronomers will explore the Universe in more depth than ever.

“By delivering the sharpest view possible using visible light, MAVIS will be a unique and powerful complement to these future large facilities, which target infrared wavelengths.”

[Editor’s Note 7/4/2021: The article was updated to explain what the MAVIS acronym stands for.]

AstronomyMacquarie UniversityPopularVery Large Telescope
Comments ( 21 )
Add Comment
  • Science is Fun-Damental

    A science-based publication uses a relevant acronym in their story nearly a dozen times, yet they don’t explain what the acronym stands for, (not even once)? MAVIS stands for “Multi-conjugate-adaptive-optics Assisted Visible Imager and Spectrograph”.

    You’re welcome.

    • Mike O'Neill

      Thanks for the note. The article has been updated to fix this omission.

  • Jeremy

    And then musk slaps a few dozen satellites right in front of it,cos profit.

  • John MacTaggart

    Be nice if the authors of the article told us when the telescope is expected to be completed.

  • dude

    It will see FARTHER. One cannot see further.

    • Dude's admirer

      Thank you for pointing that out! I hate it that some dictionaries say they’re interchangeable. That’s only possible if someone can “farther a project” which it (<- the indefinite article for "someone" when gender is unknown) can't. Further requires an object; farther is about distance. I'm glad you beat me to that because scitechdaily should be ashamed, like 99% of media publications, for conflating those words!

  • Peter

    It would be nice to get an explanation of how MCAO intends to deliver sharp images across a wide field of view. Current adaptive optics use lasers to create false stars then distort a secondary mirror to correct for atmospheric disturbance to those images, but it only works for the center of the field of view.

  • LHL

    “farther” not “further”

    • blurry image

      Everybody does not purchase an expensive DSLR blur camera to capture/snap the auto blur image. But don’t worry we solve this problem freely.

  • Agent

    Starlink will burst the Bubble of the Hubble Bubble’s burster. Several ground based observatories are already having trouble and it’s only at 10% (or less) of what Starlink plans to do?

  • M Jackson

    According to the computer model illustration it appears at least one member of the village people will be involved.

  • Otto1923

    Just think when we get one out in space-

  • Don

    FARTHER !!

  • Pat

    Yet we have no instruments that can see the bottom of the ocean….. Makes perfect sense to worry about whats in space and not the undiscovered right here with us on earth.

  • Jeff

    No pictures? WTH?

  • Vernon Goins

    Yeah, yeah. Hubble does, while MAVIS “will.” Come back and talk to me when MAVIS does.

  • Dennis

    Some of us need to lighten up. After referencing a half dozen dictionaries, not a single one indicates that further is inappropriate here. The author didn’t do anything wrong. Perhaps that was grammatically incorrect when we were all taking grammar lessons, but languages grow and evolve over time. Especially English. And that is a good thing. Otherwise the first sentence should read something like: Australian mennisc lôgian spôwan timbran unscende of dôð fyrhð m¯æst wealdende eorðe fæstian telescopes ðêah foregehâtan ongeniman “ scrîðend fyr swâðêah forwards dêorwyrðlic ongêanweard cnêowm¯æg âweorpan wægn Hubble Space Telescope unlûcan rýnes râd sê ærlic staðol. Yes, that is English. (The words are more or less correct, though no doubt the grammar is atrocious.) So I embrace the use of further. Even if it also means that literally is now literally the opposite of literally.

  • Ro3

    Coming from Big Island, is this a tacit acknowledgement that TMT is dead? Hard to get excited about an 8m add-on when a building project for a 30m telescope on Manua Kea has already broken ground.

  • John

    More powerful than Hubble? My own 20/20 vision is more powerful than any telescope that doesn’t exist. But, I understand Nasa needs a way out claiming Hubble is failing.

  • Kevin

    Further, or farther?

  • Rob

    I’m really worried that with Starlink 13,000 satellites it will be almost impossible to get any reasonable pictures from any ground based telescopes. Is there even a way we can stop this pollution? And with all those satellites up there it might even be dangerous to launch any spacecraft