First clear confirmation of accretion disk formation in a tidal disruption event without x-ray emissions supports theoretical predictions.
When a star passes too close to a supermassive black hole, tidal forces tear it apart, producing a bright flare of radiation as material from the star falls into the black hole. Astronomers study the light from these “tidal disruption events” (TDEs) for clues to the feeding behavior of the supermassive black holes lurking at the centers of galaxies.
“My jaw dropped, and I immediately knew this was going to be interesting.” — Ryan Foley
New TDE observations led by astronomers at UC Santa Cruz now provide clear evidence that debris from the star forms a rotating disk, called an accretion disk, around the black hole. Theorists have been debating whether an accretion disk can form efficiently during a tidal disruption event, and the new findings, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, should help resolve that question, said first author Tiara Hung, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Santa Cruz.
“In classical theory, the TDE flare is powered by an accretion disk, producing x-rays from the inner region where hot gas spirals into the black hole,” Hung said. “But for most TDEs, we don’t see x-rays—they mostly shine in the ultraviolet and optical wavelengths—so it was suggested that, instead of a disk, we’re seeing emissions from the collision of stellar debris streams.”
Computer simulation of the disruption of a star by a black hole shows the formation of an eccentric accretion disk of stellar material spiraling into the black hole. This video shows the early stage in the formation of the disk. Credit: Jamie Law-Smith and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz
Coauthors Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC, and Jane Dai at the University of Hong Kong developed a theoretical model, published in 2018, that can explain why x-rays are usually not observed in TDEs despite the formation of an accretion disk. The new observations provide strong support for this model.
“This is the first solid confirmation that accretion disks form in these events, even when we don’t see x-rays,” Ramirez-Ruiz said. “The region close to the black hole is obscured by an optically thick wind, so we don’t see the x-ray emissions, but we do see optical light from an extended elliptical disk.”
The telltale evidence for an accretion disk comes from spectroscopic observations. Coauthor Ryan Foley, assistant professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC, and his team began monitoring the TDE (named AT 2018hyz) after it was first detected in November 2018 by the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN). Foley noticed an unusual spectrum while observing the TDE with the 3-meter Shane Telescope at UC’s Lick Observatory on the night of January 1, 2019.
“My jaw dropped, and I immediately knew this was going to be interesting,” he said. “What stood out was the hydrogen line—the emission from hydrogen gas—which had a double-peaked profile that was unlike any other TDE we’d seen.”
Foley explained that the double peak in the spectrum results from the Doppler effect, which shifts the frequency of light emitted by a moving object. In an accretion disk spiraling around a black hole and viewed at an angle, some of the material will be moving toward the observer, so the light it emits will be shifted to a higher frequency, and some of the material will be moving away from the observer, its light shifted to a lower frequency.
“It’s the same effect that causes the sound of a car on a race track to shift from a high pitch as the car comes toward you to a lower pitch when it passes and starts moving away from you,” Foley said. “If you’re sitting in the bleachers, the cars on one turn are all moving toward you and the cars on the other turn are moving away from you. In an accretion disk, the gas is moving around the black hole in a similar way, and that’s what gives the two peaks in the spectrum.”
The team continued to gather data over the next few months, observing the TDE with several telescopes as it evolved over time. Hung led a detailed analysis of the data, which indicates that disk formation took place relatively quickly, in a matter of weeks after the disruption of the star. The findings suggest that disk formation may be common among optically detected TDEs despite the rarity of double-peaked emission, which depends on factors such as the inclination of the disk relative to observers.
“I think we got lucky with this one,” Ramirez-Ruiz said. “Our simulations show that what we observe is very sensitive to the inclination. There is a preferred orientation to see these double-peak features, and a different orientation to see x-ray emissions.”
He noted that Hung’s analysis of multi-wavelength follow-up observations, including photometric and spectroscopic data, provides unprecedented insights into these unusual events. “When we have spectra, we can learn a lot about the kinematics of the gas and get a much clearer understanding of the accretion process and what is powering the emissions,” Ramirez-Ruiz said.
Reference: “Prompt Accretion Disk Formation in an X-Ray Faint Tidal Disruption Event” by Tiara Hung, Ryan J. Foley, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, Jane L. Dai, Katie Auchettl, Charles D. Kilpatrick, Brenna Mockler, Jonathan S. Brown, David A. Coulter, Georgios Dimitriadis, Thomas W.-S. Holoien, Jamie A.P. Law-Smith, Anthony L. Piro, Armin Rest, César Rojas-Bravo and Matthew R. Siebert, Accepted, Astrophysical Journal.
In addition to Hung, Foley, Ramirez-Ruiz, and other members of the UCSC team, the coauthors of the paper also include scientists at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen (where Ramirez-Ruiz holds a Niels Bohr Professorship); University of Hong Kong; University of Melbourne, Australia; Carnegie Institution for Science; and Space Telescope Science Institute.
Observations were obtained at Lick Observatory, the W. M. Keck Observatory, the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) telescope, and the Swope Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the Heising-Simons Foundation.
“When a star passes too close to a supermassive black hole, tidal forces tear it apart, producing a bright flare of radiation as material from the star falls into the black hole.”
This is stated over and over as fact. Whatever gets near a black hole gets torn apart. So, again, please explain how, when there should have been direct and verifiable evidence of a black hole gobbling something up, it didn’t happen when the G2 gas cloud approached the Sagittarius A SUPERMASSIVE black hole. If your theory absolutely requires that something happen, and you verify that that something didn’t happen when it absolutely should have, shouldn’t that call your theory into question? And to quickly change the narrative to the cloud being a binary star system, which is also pure speculation, still doesn’t explain why WHATEVER approached the Sagittarius A supermassive black hole didn’t get gobbled up. But can’t have inconvenient data upsetting the black hole apple cart, so it was treated as move along, nothing to see here.
Everything that today’s science presents as some evidence does not agree with the laws of the universe, according to which matter is formed and how it is created and how it disappears (these are places – black holes).
Everything in the universe is formed from the substance Aether, which fills the universe, no matter how big it is. But in order to balance phenomena, there must be a constant amount of matter in the universe in various forms. Black holes serve to transform matter in them again into the Aether from which it was formed. These are renewable processes, and when science understands that, there will be less nebulae !!!