NASA Dropping Cosmic Nicknames That May Be Considered Racially Insensitive – “We Must Make It Inclusive”

Composite Image of Planetary Nebula NGC 2392

As of August 1, 2020, NASA no longer refers to nebula NGC 2392 as the “Eskimo Nebula,” as it can be considered an insensitive and offensive term. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/IAA-CSIC/N. Ruiz et al; Optical: NASA/STScI

Distant cosmic objects such as planets, galaxies, and nebulae are sometimes referred to by the scientific community with unofficial nicknames. As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful. NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. 

As an initial step, NASA will no longer refer to planetary nebula NGC 2392, the glowing remains of a Sun-like star that is blowing off its outer layers at the end of its life, as the “Eskimo Nebula.” “Eskimo” is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions. Most official documents have moved away from its use. NASA will also no longer use the term “Siamese Twins Galaxy” to refer to NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, a pair of spiral galaxies found in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster. Moving forward, NASA will use only the official, International Astronomical Union designations in cases where nicknames are inappropriate. 

Spiral Galaxy Pair NGC 4567 and NGC 4568

Spiral galaxy pair NGC 4567 and NGC 4568 will no longer be referred to as the “Siamese Twins Galaxy” by NASA. Credit: CHART32 Team, Processing – Johannes Schedler

“I support our ongoing reevaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at Headquarters, Washington. “Our goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and we’ll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that. Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value.”

Nicknames are often more approachable and public-friendly than official names for cosmic objects, such as Barnard 33, whose nickname “the Horsehead Nebula” invokes its appearance. But often seemingly innocuous nicknames can be harmful and detract from the science. 

The Agency will be working with diversity, inclusion, and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences to provide guidance and recommendations for other nicknames and terms for review.

“These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them,” said Stephen T. Shih, Associate Administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity at NASA Headquarters. “Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive.”

7 Comments on "NASA Dropping Cosmic Nicknames That May Be Considered Racially Insensitive – “We Must Make It Inclusive”"

  1. LMFAO, stop this BS before it’s too late.

  2. Our tax dollars should NOT be spent re-writing history or re-naming stars.

  3. Pathetic!

  4. The people in NASA who have made this decision have clearly not visited Alaska. Up there, the Eskimo Call *themselves* Eskimo. How do I know this? My wife and I visited Prudhoe Bay in 2015 and our guide on our trip out to the coast was one of the security staff, who told us that he is quarter Eskimo. He told us many things about First Nation life up on the North Slope and made the comment that, while “Inuit” is a Canadian term, the Alaskan locals call themselves Eskimo.
    Very disappointed with NASA. I expected better from them.

  5. I have also traveled to Alaska more than 7 times in the last 20 years. Eskimos are proud of the fact that they are Eskimos!, what a waste of taxpayers dollars. Stop trying to rewrite history. Simply a pathetic try to appease the public…

  6. Donald F. Switlick | August 10, 2020 at 6:35 am | Reply

    Black Hole. What do we call it now???

  7. Re-writing history is the worst insult of all. Let it stand as it is because the truth is far more important than pretending it did not happen.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.