ESA’s “Design for Demise” strategy makes satellites easier to burn up during reentry, reducing space debris risks.
It might be counter-intuitive, but designing satellites to better fall apart is one of the key strategies to combat space debris. Developed by ESA’s Clean Space initiative, the approach is called ‘Design for Demise’ and involves making sure that derelict satellites will break up and burn up fully as they reenter the atmosphere.
Reentering space hardware should burn up entirely in the course of plunging through the atmosphere to be safe. In practice, some pieces can make it all the way down to Earth – some of them big enough to do serious damage.
In 1997, for instance, Texans Steve and Verona Gutowski were woken by the impact of what looked like a “dead rhinoceros” just 50 m (160 ft) from their farmhouse. It turned out to be a 250 kg (550 lb) fuel tank from a rocket stage.
Modern space debris regulations demand that such incidents should not happen. Uncontrolled re-entries should have a less than 1 in 10,000 chance of injuring anyone on the ground.
As part of a larger effort called cleansat, ESA is developing technologies and techniques to ensure future low-orbiting satellites are designed according to the concept of ‘D4D’ – design for demise.
Some heavier satellite elements are more likely to survive the reentry process. These include magnetotorquers which use magnets to shift spacecraft orientation against Earth’s magnetic field, optical instruments, propellant, and pressure tanks, the drive mechanisms operating solar arrays, and reaction wheels – spinning gyroscopes used to change a satellite’s pointing direction.
One element of D4D research involves actually melting such bulky items within plasma wind tunnels capable of reproducing the fiery conditions involved. Another is to plan methods of ensuring an early breakup of reentering debris.
During reentry, peak heat fluxes and mechanical loads usually result in a satellite’s break-up at around 75 km (47 mi). Only after this altitude will most of the internal equipment exposed to the heat flux start ‘demising’ as well.
But engineering a higher break-up altitude would imply that the internal equipment would be exposed to the heat flux for a longer time, greatly enhancing its overall demisability. Possible ways to ensure this include more meltable joints holding satellite panels together or the use of ‘shape memory alloys’ which shift shape with temperature.
Clean Space also uses the DRAMA (Debris Risk Assessment and Mitigation Analysis) software to calculate the compliance of a given satellite design with space debris mitigation standards and to ensure that the latest research findings are accounted for, always aiming to reduce the risk of injury below that crucial 1 in 10,000 value.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.