Stone Tools Buried in Graves Is Evidence of Sexual Division of Labor in Europe 5,000 Years Ago

Neolithic Farmers

Neolithic agriculturalists. Credit: Illustration by L.P. Repiso

A new investigation of stone tools buried in graves provides evidence supporting the existence of a division of different types of labor between people of male and female biological sex at the start of the Neolithic. Alba Masclans of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas in Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS ONE.

Previous research has suggested that a sexual division of labor existed in Europe during the transition to the Neolithic period, when farming practices spread across the continent. However, many questions remain as to how different tasks became culturally associated with women, men, and perhaps other genders at this time.

To provide further insights, Masclans and colleagues analyzed over 400 stone tools buried in graves in various cemeteries in central Europe about 5,000 years ago during the Early Neolithic. They examined the tools’ physical characteristics, including microscopic patterns of wear, in order to determine how the tools were used. Then, they analyzed these clues in the context of isotopic and osteological data from the graves.

The analysis showed that people of male biological sex were buried with stone tools that had previously been used for woodwork, butchery, hunting, or interpersonal violence. Meanwhile, those of female biological sex were buried with stone tools used on animal hides or leather.

The researchers also found geographic variations in these results, hinting that as agricultural practices spread westwards, sexual division of labor may have shifted. The authors note that the analyzed tools were not necessarily used by the specific people they were buried with, but could have been chosen to represent activities typically carried out by different genders.

These findings provide new support for the existence of sexual division of labor in the early Neolithic in Europe. The authors hope their study will contribute to better understanding of the complex factors involved in the rise of gender inequalities in the Neolithic, which may be heavily rooted in the division of labor during the transition to farming.

The authors add: “Our study points towards a complex and dynamic gendered social organization rooted in a sexed division of labor from the earliest Neolithic.”

Reference: “A sexual division of labour at the start of agriculture? A multi-proxy comparison through grave good stone tool technological and use-wear analysis” by Alba Masclans, Caroline Hamon, Christian Jeunesse and Penny Bickle, 14 April 2021, PLOS ONE.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249130

Funding: Funding was provided by the projects: “The Diffusion of Farming Practices: new technologies, craft innovations and symbolic behaviors in Western and Central Europe” (AM) funded by the Fyssen Foundation grant with the support of the UMR 8215-Trajectoires (CNRS – Université Paris 1), and “The Diffusion of Farming Practices in Central Europe through gender studies” (AM) funded by the DAAD- Short-Term Grant (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst). We also acknowledge the funding of a Juan de la Cierva Formación post-doctoral grant (AM) by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Spanish National Research Council. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

5 Comments on "Stone Tools Buried in Graves Is Evidence of Sexual Division of Labor in Europe 5,000 Years Ago"

  1. “people of male and female biological sex”

    Seven words when three should suffice. This is NOT progress! Those neolithic farmers were probably too busy trying to survive to worry about the fine points of gender assignment.

    Non-biological sex is as much of an oxymoron as “inorganic food.” What tangled webs we weave! Political correctness may be our undoing.

  2. really,,,? POSSIBLE other genders,,,not in abstract,you couldn’t help yourself !

  3. oh i know ,the password is “inclusive”,more. readers,really ?

  4. Actually, there is a lot of anthropological study nonbinary sexuality. Do a little Google work and you can find it (example below). Given that in many cultures nonbinary individuals held notable positions which might yield enhanced burial practices, distinguishing biological sex is important to note.'s_Community_College/ANTH_205%3A_Cultures_of_the_World_-_Perspectives_on_Culture_(Scheib)/12%3A_Gender_and_Sexuality/12.03%3A_The_Gender_Binary_and_Beyond

  5. … it is an evidence of many more things, after all…

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.