Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Earth»The Surprising Link Between CO2 Levels and Satellite Collisions
    Earth

    The Surprising Link Between CO2 Levels and Satellite Collisions

    By University of BirminghamMarch 10, 20255 Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Space Junk Hazards
    Global warming is affecting space by cooling and shrinking the upper atmosphere, allowing satellites to stay in orbit longer. This increases the risk of collisions and dangerous space debris, highlighting an urgent need for sustainable space policies alongside climate action. Credit: University of Warwick/Mark Garlick

    Climate change isn’t just warming the planet—it’s reshaping space.

    As greenhouse gases trap heat in the lower atmosphere, the upper atmosphere cools and contracts, reducing the drag that naturally pulls old satellites back to Earth. With satellites lingering longer in orbit, the risk of collisions and space debris skyrockets, threatening the future of satellite communications, weather forecasting, and navigation.

    Rising Satellite Numbers and a Changing Atmosphere

    More than 8,000 satellites currently orbit Earth at altitudes between 300 and 1,000 km, within the thermosphere — our planet’s upper atmosphere. While space weather events like solar flares and coronal mass ejections can briefly alter the density of this region, researchers at the University of Birmingham suggest that climate change is driving a much longer-term shift.

    Greenhouse gases (GHGs) play a key role in this change. In the lower atmosphere, these gases trap heat, warming the planet. However, they also transfer heat away from the upper atmosphere, causing it to cool and contract. As a result, satellites are left in areas where the atmosphere is thinner.

    Less Atmospheric Drag, More Space Junk

    This reduced atmospheric density means less drag on satellites, which significantly affects their lifespan. Normally, atmospheric friction gradually slows satellites, causing them to fall back to Earth over time. Without enough drag, they remain in orbit longer than intended.

    This extended stay increases the risk of satellite collisions, leading to more space debris and making it harder to launch new satellites safely.

    A New Threat to Space Sustainability

    The findings, published today (March 10) in Nature Sustainability, provide a clear link between ground-level sustainability and space sustainability.

    Lead researcher Matthew Brown, from the SERENE research group, said: “Often we think only about the ground-, or sea-level impacts of climate change, but this research demonstrates that the impacts will reach as high as space.

    “The number of satellites in low Earth orbit is rapidly expanding and we rely heavily on them for communications, Earth observation, weather forecasting, and navigation. For this reason, we need to take the long-term sustainability of space very seriously.”

    The Growing Risk of Kessler Syndrome

    Dr. Brown added: “Discussions are already underway about how many satellites can be put into space at any one time, as more and more instruments are being launched into low Earth orbit. Without checking this proliferation, we are in danger of entering a ‘Kessler syndrome’, where a chain reaction of collisions causes space to become unusable.

    “While technology can help these objects avoid collision, recognizing the influence that the Earth’s natural environment has on our ability to operate in space is becoming increasingly important. A coordinated approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions would ensure we can prevent the exploitation of the thermosphere and protect it for future generations.”

    Reference: “Greenhouse gases reduce the satellite carrying capacity of low Earth orbit” by William E. Parker, Matthew K. Brown and Richard Linares, 10 March 2025, Nature Sustainability.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-025-01512-0

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Atmospheric Science Carbon Dioxide Climate Change Greenhouse Gas Satellites Space Debris Sustainability University of Birmingham
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    The Sky Is Falling – And It’s Leaving Space Junk Stuck in Orbit

    Unexpected Methane Surge: Clean Air Policies Could Be Backfiring

    Turning Up the Heat: How Climate Change Supercharges CO2’s Impact

    It’s Not Just Smokestacks to Worry About: Mountain Streams Emit a Surprising Amount of CO2

    Princeton Experts: Controlling Methane Is a Fast and Critical Way to Slow Global Warming

    NASA to Launch Spacecraft to Keep Track of Global Carbon Dioxide

    Carbon Absorption by Plants Limited by the Abundance of Soil Nutrients

    Diseased Trees May Be a Significant Source of Methane That Causes Climate Change

    The First ‘Bottom-Up’ Estimates of China’s CO2 Emissions

    5 Comments

    1. Clyde Spencer on March 10, 2025 10:54 am

      “The numbers of satellites in low Earth orbit is rapidly expanding and we rely heavily on them for communications, Earth observation, weather forecasting and navigation. For this reason, we need to take the long-term sustainability of space very seriously.”

      Satellites are abandoned if their batteries die, they run out of maneuvering fuel, or there is damage from micrometeors or cosmic rays. With solar power, battery depletion is less of a concern. Similarly, with less drag, there is less need for orbit adjustments, prolonging fuel. Therefore, if a satellite continues to operate as intended, it obviates a need for launching a replacement.

      I think that this concern is misplaced and a stretch for justifying reducing anthropogenic CO2. During the COVID shutdowns, there was no change in the shape or peak of the seasonal CO2 ramp-up phase compared to 2019 or 2021. That is, a 10-20% reduction in anthropogenic emissions seems to have no immediate impact on the atmospheric concentration of CO2. That is probably because the CO2 emissions are driven primarily by biological activity, and changes in the 4% of total CO2 flux provided by humans is not measurable.

      Reply
    2. Boba on March 11, 2025 2:44 am

      They now want to make us care for the gazillion of satellites that clog the skies, too?

      Let them collide away. For communication, GPS and science we only needed like fifty of them. The remaining fifty thousand is just commercial and military junk.

      Reply
      • Rob on March 11, 2025 2:46 pm

        For communication, we only need copper telephone cables, analog telephones, fax machines and a decent postal service withe twice a day deliveries. The rest is over-sophisticated space junk.

        Reply
      • Alvarez on March 11, 2025 8:01 pm

        ….and shrapnel.

        Reply
    3. Robert on March 11, 2025 11:23 am

      Unfortunately there is a consortium to publish anything – and ‘stretch’ of half-logic to promote climate hysteria. Spencer Publishing – has purchased every ‘company’ with a title to saturate discourse –
      We now live in a world where non-truths permeate and there is no science. Not the science we all expect of it.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Largest-Ever Study Finds Medicinal Cannabis Ineffective for Anxiety, Depression, PTSD

    250-Million-Year-Old Egg Solves One of Evolution’s Biggest Mysteries

    Living With Roommates Might Be Changing Your Gut Microbiome Without You Knowing

    Century-Old Cleaning Chemical Linked to 500% Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

    What if Your Memories Never Happened? Physicists Take a New Look at the Boltzmann Brain Paradox

    One of the Universe’s Largest Stars May Be Getting Ready To Explode

    Scientists Discover Enzyme That Could Supercharge Ozempic-Like Weight Loss Drugs

    Popular Sweetener Linked to DNA Damage – “It’s Something You Should Not Be Eating”

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Scientists Prove There Are Just Six Degrees of Separation in a Social Network
    • Bee Bacteria Could Fix a Major Flaw in Plant-Based Milk
    • Scientists Discover a Surprising Way To Make Bread Healthier and More Nutritious
    • Natural Compounds Boost Bone Implant Success While Killing Bacteria and Cancer Cells
    • After 60 Years, Scientists Uncover Unexpected Brain Effects of Popular Diabetes Drug Metformin
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.