
Salar de Uyuni holds the world’s largest lithium reserve, but mining could threaten local ecosystems. A study by Duke University researchers found that lithium-brine evaporation ponds significantly increase arsenic levels, posing risks to wildlife and groundwater. They also analyzed reinjection methods to prevent land subsidence, but these could disrupt lithium extraction.
The world’s largest known lithium deposit lies within the vast Salar de Uyuni, a sprawling salt pan that covers thousands of square miles atop a high, arid Andean plateau in Bolivia. For much of the year, the terrain is encrusted with salt crystals as white as confectioner’s sugar. During the wet season, pooling rainwater mirrors surrounding mountains and sky.
“The Salar is a magical place for travelers from all over the world who come to see the colors, the reflections, in this endless white landscape,” said Avner Vengosh, Nicholas Chair of Environmental Quality at the Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment.
What most tourists don’t see is the vast reserve of lithium dissolved in highly saline brine just beneath their feet. Trapped within sediments and salts that extend from a few feet to over 160 feet below the surface, this untapped trove could become a crucial resource for the renewable energy sector.
For the past few years, Vengosh, who is also chair of the Division of Earth and Climate Sciences at the Nicholas School, and Ph.D. student Gordon Williams have been working to understand the potential environmental health implications of lithium mining, both in the U.S. and abroad.
The First Comprehensive Study on Lithium Brine Wastewater
Reporting in Environmental Science & Technology Letters in January 2025, the duo conducted the first thorough chemical analysis of wastewater associated with mining the lithium brine at the Salar de Uyuni. Their findings could inform strategies to manage future mining operations more sustainably and protect the fragile salar environment.
Lithium-brine mining currently entails a multi-step process that generally goes like this: Brine is pumped from below the surface into a series of shallow, above-ground evaporation ponds. As liquid evaporates in successive ponds, undesirable salts precipitate out. Lithium, however, becomes more concentrated in the brine at each stage. The concentrated lithium is eventually moved from the evaporation ponds to a nearby facility for processing into lithium carbonate — the material that goes into rechargeable batteries.

Lithium extraction at the Salar de Uyuni is in preliminary stages. However, research has shown that long-term mining of lithium brines in other salt pans, such as the Salar de Atacama in Chile, can cause groundwater levels to decline and land to subside, or sink. Such impacts could affect the future of lithium mining at the Salar de Uyuni, according to Vengosh.
For their study, Williams and Vengosh analyzed the chemistry of lithium brine and waste materials associated with a pilot mining operation at the Salar de Uyuni. In particular, they were interested in determining acidity and presence of trace elements, such as arsenic, a toxic metal that can cause a range of health problems in exposed people and wildlife. Samples from the mine site included natural brine pumped from underground; brine from eight evaporation ponds; and wastewater from the lithium processing facility.
In natural brine samples, the team measured arsenic levels between 1 and 9 parts per million, as well as relatively neutral acidity. In comparison, evaporation pond brine became increasingly acidic as it became more concentrated.
Arsenic levels also dramatically increased from pond to pond. For example, the last pond revealed arsenic levels at nearly 50 parts per million — about 1,400 times higher than the benchmark considered ecologically acceptable by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
“This arsenic level is extremely high,” Vengosh remarked. “My group has worked all over the world — in Africa, Europe, Vietnam, India — and I don’t think we ever measured that level of arsenic.”
Risks to Wildlife and Ecosystem Health
As the authors noted, leaking or intentional discharge of brine from the evaporation ponds to the surrounding salt pan could negatively affect wildlife.
“There’s a risk for bioaccumulation,” said Williams, referring to the process by which chemicals build up in organisms over time, with potentially harmful consequences. Flamingos, for instance, feed on local brine shrimp, which are sensitive to arsenic at levels above 8 parts per million.
The team also found that levels of boron — which can potentially cause health effects depending on the nature of exposure — increased from evaporation pond to evaporation pond. By contrast, wastewater from the lithium processing plant showed relatively low levels of boron and arsenic similar to, and in some cases lower than, levels found in the natural brines.
Additionally, Williams and Vengosh investigated the potential repercussions of taking spent brine — that is, brine left over after lithium is removed — or wastewater from lithium processing and injecting it back into the lithium deposit. The lithium-mining industry has indicated these approaches can counteract land subsidence.
The team found that both injection methods would have undesirable consequences. For example, the spent brine would likely mix poorly with natural brine, hindering the flow of brine below the surface and potentially interfering with pumping. On the other hand, injecting wastewater back into the deposit could dilute the lithium resource.
One potential solution to preventing land subsidence would be to carefully blend spent brine with wastewater to achieve a chemical balance with the natural brine, the authors indicated. However, future studies should further investigate the environmental implications of that strategy, they added.
For their part, Williams and Vengosh are turning their attention to the origin of lithium at the Salar de Uyuni.
“We’re building a geochemical model to understand why lithium is enriched in those brines,” Williams explained. “What’s the source? And what’s the mechanism causing this concentration?”
Additionally, Williams, Vengosh, and Ph.D. student Hannah Wudke are working with another Nicholas School team — led by John O. Blackburn Distinguished Professor Erika Weinthal — to understand how lithium-brine mining at the Salar de Uyuni could affect the health and well-being of neighboring Indigenous communities.
“We see lithium as the future for energy security, so we’re trying to analyze it from different angles to ensure sustainable development and supplies,” Vengosh said.
Reference: “Quality of Wastewater from Lithium-Brine Mining” by Gordon D. Z. Williams and Avner Vengosh, 17 January 2025, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c01124
Funding: This study was supported by the Duke University Climate Research Innovation Seed Program (CRISP), the Duke University Josiah Charles Trent Memorial Foundation Endowment Fund, and the Duke University Graduate School Dissertation Research Travel Award.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
11 Comments
“…, they were interested in determining acidity and presence of trace elements, …”
With carbonates being present, I’d be extremely surprised to discover that the brines were acidic. A carbonate solution would be expected to be decomposed by excess hydronium ions and release carbon dioxide, while producing water.
“In natural brine samples, the team measured arsenic levels…, as well as relatively neutral acidity. In comparison, evaporation pond brine became increasingly acidic as it became more concentrated.”
In the vocabulary used by geochemists, “neutral acidity” is an oxymoron. A pH of 3.2 (about the same as vinegar) is commonly used as an example of common acids, not a “relatively neutral acid.” Solutions are either acidic, neutral, or basic. I suspect that they are using the unconventional vocabulary of climatologists instead of the established definitions of chemistry. That is, I suspect that by “acidity” they actually mean “pH.” However, that unconventional use obscures the facts about what actually happens in the evaporation ponds. That is, does the brine ever actually become acidic versus the probable alkaline state? I doubt it, but they have introduced a contradictory claim that has to be considered. It is important because acids react to metals and alkaline solutions differently than alkaline solutions do. Most likely, the brines started out with a pH of about 8 (which is what the oceans are) and the pH moved toward a neutral pH of 7, although they don’t explain why when the brines are buffered by carbonates and borates. However, the abstract says that the pH actually gets as low as 3.2, without an explanation of why it happens. I think that this is an important omission.
https://www.chemistrylearner.com/ph-scale.html
The reason for having multiple evaporation ponds is that the least soluble salts crystalize first, and are removed from the brine. This isn’t discussed, nor do they mention how the early crystalizing salts are disposed of. This is an important consideration for a study about how an ecosystem may be disturbed by lithium mining.
By trying to be politically correct, (I’m being generous here in assuming that they understand that they are perverting the meaning of important words.) they have diminished the value of the science they are doing by claims that are contradictory in the carefully defined vocabulary of geochemists. Words are important and scientists go to great pains to use words with agreed upon definitions so that there is no ambiguity about what is being claimed.
Climatologists (and some oceanographers) are doing a great disservice to science by adopting an attitude that the end justifies any means. In this case, the means is to scare the public by re-defining words like “acid,” replacing words like “pH” and “alkali” with a word that most people only associate with the dangerous acid used in lead-acid batteries for automobiles. The reality is that the most common acid in ocean water and brines is a weak acid known as carbonic acid.
So more people can be poisoned by lithium? No thanks.
Sorry Bolivia, but announcing you have Lithium means Trump will now take over your nation for Elon Musk to profit.
Should have stayed quiet.
Can you explain how your compulsion to share your political opinion is a contribution to a science website?
“Should have stayed quiet.” Good personal advice.
Oh my Clyde why are you so moral?
We all covet cheap lithium.
Are you suggesting that a person can be too moral, honest, or wise? The grammar of English allows us to say that someone can be too immoral, dishonest, or foolish. Of course that suggests that whoever would say such a thing apparently accepts a certain level of corruption as normal. Where do you stand? Do you support unethical behavior?
Given Trump’s propensity for using strong arm rhetoric over places like Panama and Greenland, his unilateral, pompous renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, and his current attempt at extorting Ukraine’s mineral wealth for more consideration during peace “negotiations” while acting like Putin’s ventriloquist dummy, I’d say the comment by David is not so far of the mark. You may protest his political view being expressed here, but people do that all the time. I doubt you would be as upset if he wasn’t so critical of Trump.
As for your holier-than- thou jab at Tomasko Krupinsky, that was just your thin skin talking. Okay, so now go ahead and have the last word, Clyde, you know you need to.
Elon on supported trump because his constituents asked for it. He’s only doing what his crazed masses ask…. So can all of You stop being so insane. Trump is a basic celebrity at best and has zero political experience. He legally should not have been able to been elected the first time. Our country has requirements for presidents, and the only one he met was his age.
Get help. Medication is available.
Funny how people want to go all electric but we can’t mine the products needed to do it. The complainers live in wood houses but don’t want you to cut down trees to get the wood needed. They drive a car that uses gasoline to protests, but don’t want us to pump the needed product from the earth. They complain about President Trump and Elton Musk, but don’t say a word about how the last several years the former government stole billions of our dollars right in front of our face. Now you can hardly afford eggs because of them. Oh, but thats OK. Come on complainers.. wake up. Look at what your doing.
The lithium deposit at McDermitt Caldera, on the border of Oregon and Nevada, USA, may possibly be as much as twice the size of this deposit.