Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»What Kills Schrödinger’s Cat? Scientists Just Ruled Out a 60-Year-Old Theory
    Physics

    What Kills Schrödinger’s Cat? Scientists Just Ruled Out a 60-Year-Old Theory

    By Foundational Questions Institute, FQXiOctober 19, 202612 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Decohering Schrödinger's Cat
    Schrödinger’s cat illustrates the quantum paradox of an object existing in two states at once. A new study tests whether gravity could explain why such quantum behavior disappears in the everyday world. Credit: FQxI/Gabriel Fitzpatrick (2026)

    Gravity has been proposed as a reason quantum superpositions become difficult to observe in everyday objects. A new experiment challenges one longstanding model of this process.

    A detector buried deep beneath an Italian mountain has challenged a decades-old theory about why quantum behavior disappears from the world we experience. After 62 days of measurements, researchers found no trace of the faint radiation predicted by a model in which gravity disrupts quantum states. The result rules out this particular explanation while leaving open the possibility that gravity contributes to quantum decoherence.

    Decoherence helps explain why particles can display unusual quantum behavior, such as existing in superpositions of different states, while everyday objects appear to follow classical physics. “One of the deepest questions in modern physics is why the strange quantum behavior that governs atoms and elementary particles seems to disappear in the macroscopic world we experience every day,” says Catalina Curceanu, director of research and spokesperson for the VIP Collaboration at the National Laboratory of Frascati of the National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN-LNF) in Italy.

    Could Fluctuations in Spacetime Disrupt Quantum Behavior?

    In the 1960s, Hungarian physicist Frigyes Károlyházy proposed that spacetime undergoes constant, extremely small fluctuations. According to his model, these disturbances gradually destroy quantum superpositions, preventing large objects from displaying effects such as those illustrated by Schrödinger’s famous thought experiment involving a cat that is both alive and dead.

    The proposal connects quantum mechanics with Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime. Although Károlyházy’s original idea dates back decades, it has continued to attract attention. FQxI researcher Angelo Bassi and his colleagues recently reformulated the model, allowing its predictions to be examined experimentally.

    The hypothesized fluctuations cannot be measured directly, but they should have a detectable consequence. They would cause electrically charged particles to undergo tiny random accelerations, producing extremely weak electromagnetic radiation. Detecting that radiation, or establishing its absence, provides a way to test the theory.

    Searching for a Faint Signal Deep Underground

    The FQxI-funded experiment took place at the INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory (INFN-LNGS), the world’s largest underground laboratory dedicated to fundamental physics research. Located beneath 1.4 kilometers (0.87 miles) of rock, the facility is shielded from much of the cosmic radiation that could otherwise overwhelm such a weak signal.

    “The natural shielding provided by the rock creates one of the quietest environments on Earth for detecting extremely rare physical phenomena,” says Curceanu.

    The researchers used a high-purity germanium crystal roughly the size of a coffee mug, enclosed within layers of copper and lead shielding. After collecting measurements for 62 days, they accounted for the expected background radiation and searched the remaining data for the signature predicted by Károlyházy’s model. They found no matching signal. The findings were published in the New Journal of Physics.

    What the Missing Radiation Means for Gravity

    “This absence of a signal is itself a major scientific result,” says Curceanu. The measurements exclude the tested version of Károlyházy’s model, placing new constraints on explanations that attribute quantum decoherence to fluctuations in spacetime.

    The findings do not establish that gravity has no role in decoherence. Other gravitational mechanisms remain possible, and the broader relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity is unresolved. “By ruling out one of the oldest and most natural gravity-induced decoherence models, this work narrows the search for the theory describing the interplay between gravity and quantum mechanics, bringing us one step closer to understanding one of the deepest mysteries in fundamental physics,” says Curceanu.

    Bringing Quantum Gravity Within Experimental Reach

    Károlyházy’s proposal is based on the idea that nature imposes a fundamental limit on how precisely distances and positions can be measured. Related concepts appear in modern efforts to reconcile gravity with quantum mechanics, including string theory and loop quantum gravity. In these approaches, the familiar picture of perfectly measurable spacetime may break down at extremely small scales.

    “Every quantum gravity approach ends up with predicting the existence of a minimal length connected to the uncertainty in the measurement of spacetime,” says Kristian Piscicchia, a quantum physicist at the Enrico Fermi Research Center/INFN/VIP in Italy and the experimental lead on the study. The new measurements do not establish whether such a minimum length exists, but they constrain one proposed physical consequence of spacetime uncertainty.

    “Precision experiments are now reaching a level of sensitivity where they can test ideas that, until recently, belonged almost exclusively to the realm of theoretical speculation,” says Curceanu. “As sensitivity improves, the boundary between theory and measurement continues to move, opening new possibilities for discovering the fundamental principles that govern our universe.”

    Reference: “Experimental exclusion of a generalized Károlyházy gravity-induced decoherence model” by Nicola Bortolotti, Kristian Piscicchia, Alessio Porcelli, Matthias Laubenstein, Simone Manti, Antonino Marcianò, Federico Nola and Catalina Curceanu, 19 June 2026, New Journal of Physics.
    DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ae774c

    The research was supported by the Foundational Questions Institute, FQxI, through the Consciousness in the Physical World program.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    General Relativity Gravity Popular Quantum Mechanics Quantum Physics Spacetime
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Einstein’s Gravity Just Passed a Strange New Quantum Test

    Quantum Gravity May Be Far Less Quantum Than Physicists Expected

    Einstein Meets Quantum Mechanics – And the Results Are Surprising

    Earth’s Gravity Might Be Warping Quantum Mechanics, Say Physicists

    Quantum Leap: How a New Experiment Could Solve Gravity’s Biggest Mystery

    Quantum Gravity Unveiled – Scientists Crack the Cosmic Code That Baffled Einstein

    Is Gravity Quantum? New Experiment To Probe Universe’s Deepest Mystery

    New Time Dilation Phenomenon Revealed: Timekeeping Theory Combines Quantum Clocks and Einstein’s Relativity

    Evidence of Elusive Majorana Fermions Raises Possibilities for Quantum Computing

    12 Comments

    1. Ralph Johnson on October 19, 2026 4:16 am

      The null result from the Gran Sasso subterranean experiment testing the Károlyházy gravity-induced decoherence model highlights a fundamental misstep in treating spacetime fluctuations as random, chaotic “noise” that physically bumps quantum states out of superposition.

      Searching for electromagnetic radiation from gravitational static assumes space is a passive background subject to random quantum foam jitter. If gravity is instead understood through torsional field dynamics and rotational boundary interactions, wave-function collapse is not driven by random gravitational noise. Rather, decoherence occurs via Temporal Gradient Impedance when a quantum state encounters a density boundary across scaling macroscopic matrices, forcing geometric phase-locking.

      Ruling out stochastic gravitational collapse models frees the path to treat spacetime interactions not as random environmental static, but as structured, continuous torsional dynamics. Reference Link : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1biCbf_Sbtk-AuqrWQnD-w4xOPzrHcRKwA9MHk_6kuyY/edit?usp=drive_link 🖖

      Reply
      • kindlin on October 19, 2026 5:44 pm

        I thought for sure you were BAOs already account, but he posted down below a much less reasoned, as typical, response.

        Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on October 19, 2026 7:29 pm

          VERY GOOD.

          A fundamental error prevalent in mainstream physics today is the assumption that measurement precision equates to the intrinsic determinacy of the object itself. In reality, the certainty of a measurement outcome is not equivalent to the determinacy of the measured entity. This represents a major epistemological blind spot in modern physics—one that causes us to fixate excessively on instrumental readings, while neglecting the exploration of the objective physical reality that exists independently of observation.

          Mainstream physics mistakenly believe that the ‘superposition state’ detected in experiments represents true superposition. In reality, it is merely phase blurring caused by insufficient instrumental resolution. True superposition is not something instruments can directly ‘see’; it can only be confirmed through theoretical deduction—much like how we cannot see the wind with our naked eyes, yet we can infer its existence through mathematical and physical laws.

          Using a cat that is both dead and alive to analogize quantum is merely the epitome of the Mainstream Physics‘ ignorance for ‘quantum.’

          —— https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2088659998394077633.

          Reply
    2. Charles G. Shaver on October 19, 2026 4:18 am

      Well done to the researchers. And, an interesting coincidence for me. Just last evening my most recent seven day attempt to disprove time dilation at ground level proved failed; perhaps just due too rapid of the movement of two digital wrist watches on a rotating arm through earth’s field of externally induced radiant pulsing angular lines of gravity force; a reduced rotation experiment already begun. For now, it seems, I’ll simply have to defer to my four prior demonstration videos (e.g., #4 https://odysee.com/@charlesgshaver:d/5Gravity:c) on a personal video channel since 2012 as ‘food for thought’ for serious researchers. It may be that once disengaged from earth’s ambient field of gravity with sufficient velocity that timepieces will function normally again, until slowing enough to reengage with earth’s ambient field. The quest for indisputable proof continues.

      Reply
    3. Clyde Spencer on October 19, 2026 11:08 am

      For further background to the discussion, see the Wikipedia article:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

      Reply
    4. John Sellers on October 19, 2026 1:29 pm

      Isn’t a “precise measurement” synonymous with increased interaction with what one is attempting to observe?

      Has that been adequately taken into account for this experiment?

      Reply
      • kindlin on October 19, 2026 5:49 pm

        While correct, this is not relevant to the article. The article is talking about general decoherence, not the decoherence from measurements. Imo, these are the same thing (seems obvious to me), but apparently this isn’t clear to physicists, so I’m probably missing some reason why this isn’t the totally obvious answer.

        Reply
        • kindlin on October 19, 2026 5:50 pm

          To be clear, I don’t think anything just randomly decoheres. I think it’s all based on the interactions with the environment.

          Reply
    5. Bao-hua ZHANG on October 19, 2026 5:08 pm

      Schrödinger’s cat illustrates the quantum paradox of an object existing in two states at once.
      WHY? WHY? WHY?……………….

      Please ask researchers to think deeply:
      Why are there two states instead of multiple states?

      Using a cat that is both dead and alive to analogize quantum is merely the epitome the ignorance of mainstream physics for ‘quantum.’ That cat is not quantum; it is the demon in the own minds of mainstream physics.

      —— https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2088659998394077633.

      Reply
      • kindlin on October 19, 2026 5:46 pm

        It has 2 states cuz that’s what’s being measured. Next.

        Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on October 19, 2026 6:23 pm

          VERY GOOD.
          The states of matter are inextricably linked to their structural hierarchy. In fact, matter exhibits fundamentally distinct physical states depending on its geometric form—whether as points, lines, surfaces, or volumes. This logic applies equally to the microscopic world: quantum states are not merely abstract mathematical symbols, but physical realities intrinsically bound to the hierarchical structure of matter. Grasping this concept is the key to understanding the differences between quantum two-states and many-states systems.

          Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on October 19, 2026 6:30 pm

          Any measurement behavior inevitably perturbs the system. The “correlation” observed in experiments is not an inherent “nonlocality” of the particles themselves, but a systematic “correlation” introduced by the measurement behavior itself.

          —— https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2093330454783042171.

          Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    A 50-Year-Old Mystery: Scientists Discover What May Have Killed Brazil’s Frogs

    Scientists Discover Exercise Changes the Body in Ways We Never Fully Understood

    Scientists Restore Memory in Mice With Alzheimer’s by Boosting a Single Brain Protein

    Scientists Create “Super Ice” That’s 10 Times Stronger and Rivals Concrete in Strength

    Not Getting Enough Daylight Could Be Linked to a Higher Risk of Dementia

    What Kills Schrödinger’s Cat? Scientists Just Ruled Out a 60-Year-Old Theory

    Scientists Discover Metals That Refuse To Crack at an Astonishing -424°F

    A 1,000-Year-Old DNA Mystery Links Hawaii and Easter Island and Reveals Hidden Genetic Dangers

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Forgotten Material From the 1960s Is Hiding Something Unexpected
    • Study Finds the Arctic Could Lose Far More Sea Ice Than Scientists Previously Predicted
    • A Massive Volcanic Eruption Devastated Japan 7,300 Years Ago – but Survivors Found a Way To Thrive
    • James Webb Finds a Tiny World’s Rings Changing in Opposite Ways
    • SpaceX Rocket Creates a Spectacular Glowing “Jellyfish” in the Sky
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.