A team of astronomers reveals that there are far more planets of the hot Jupiter type than expected in star cluster Messier 67.
The surprising discovery was obtained using a number of telescopes and instruments, among them the HARPS spectrograph at ESO’s La Silla Observatory in Chile. The denser environment in a cluster will cause more frequent interactions between planets and nearby stars, which may explain the excess of hot Jupiters.
A Chilean, Brazilian, and European team led by Roberto Saglia at the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, in Garching, Germany, and Luca Pasquini at ESO, has spent several years collecting high-precision measurements of 88 stars in Messier 67. This open star cluster is about the same age as the Sun and it is thought that the Solar System arose in a similarly dense environment.
The team used HARPS, along with other instruments, to look for the signatures of giant planets on short-period orbits, hoping to see the tell-tale “wobble” of a star caused by the presence of a massive object in a close orbit, a kind of planet known as a hot Jupiters. This hot Jupiter signature has now been found for a total of three stars in the cluster alongside earlier evidence for several other planets.
A hot Jupiter is a giant exoplanet with a mass of more than about a third of Jupiter’s mass. They are “hot” because they are orbiting close to their parent stars, as indicated by an orbital period (their “year”) that is less than ten days in duration. That is very different from the Jupiter we are familiar with in our own Solar System, which has a year lasting around 12 Earth- years and is much colder than the Earth.
“We want to use an open star cluster as laboratory to explore the properties of exoplanets and theories of planet formation,” explains Roberto Saglia. “Here we have not only many stars possibly hosting planets, but also a dense environment, in which they must have formed.”
This artist’s impression video shows a hot Jupiter exoplanet orbiting close to a star in the rich old star cluster Messier 67, in the constellation of Cancer (The Crab). Astronomers have found far more such planets in the cluster than expected. This surprise result was obtained using a number of telescopes and instruments, among them the HARPS spectrograph at ESO’s La Silla Observatory in Chile. The denser environment in a cluster will cause more frequent interactions between planets and nearby stars, which may explain the excess of hot Jupiters.
The study found that hot Jupiters are more common around stars in Messier 67 than is the case for stars outside of clusters. “This is really a striking result,” marvels Anna Brucalassi, who carried out the analysis. “The new results mean that there are hot Jupiters around some 5% of the Messier 67 stars studied — far more than in comparable studies of stars not in clusters, where the rate is more like 1%.”
Astronomers think it highly unlikely that these exotic giants actually formed where we now find them, as conditions so close to the parent star would not initially have been suitable for the formation of Jupiter-like planets. Rather, it is thought that they formed further out, as Jupiter probably did, and then moved closer to the parent star. What were once distant, cold, giant planets are now a good deal hotter. The question then is: what caused them to migrate inwards toward the star?
There are a number of possible answers to that question, but the authors conclude that this is most likely the result of close encounters with neighboring stars, or even with the planets in neighboring solar systems, and that the immediate environment around a solar system can have a significant impact on how it evolves.
In a cluster like Messier 67, where stars are much closer together than the average, such encounters would be much more common, which would explain the larger numbers of hot Jupiters found there.
Co-author and co-lead Luca Pasquini from ESO looks back on the remarkable recent history of studying planets in clusters: “No hot Jupiters at all had been detected in open clusters until a few years ago. In three years the paradigm has shifted from a total absence of such planets — to an excess!”
Reference: “Search for giant planets in M67 III: excess of Hot Jupiters in dense open clusters” by A. Brucalassi, L. Pasquini, R. Saglia, M. T. Ruiz, P. Bonifacio, I. Leão, B. L. Canto Martins, J. R. de Medeiros, L. R. Bedin, K. Biazzo, C. Melo, C. Lovis and S. Randich, 6 June 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
Everyone is puzzled, because they are blinkered by the core accretion theory of planet formation. Forget that, because it obviously doesn’t fit “the facts on the ground”, and instead develop a planet formation theory that does.
I (and others) have one: capture of supernova shrapnel.