Closing Borders and Stopping the COVID-19 Virus: WHO & EU Were “Fatally Mistaken”

COVID-19 Worldwide

A study reveals that countries with early travel restrictions had fewer COVID-19 deaths by mid-year. It also shows that quarantine mandates for travelers were more effective than entry bans.

Countries with international travel restrictions suffered fewer COVID-19 fatalities.

Travel restrictions implemented early on in the pandemic have been crucial in slowing the spread of the coronavirus and keeping death rates low. A new study published by Ruud Koopmans, director at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center, shows that countries that had travel restrictions in place by February or early March suffered fewer COVID-19 fatalities by mid-year than countries that acted later. The study examines 181 countries worldwide how restrictions on international travel have affected COVID-19 mortality.

Until mid-March 2020, the WHO, the EU as well as German authorities were convinced that the spread of the virus could not be curbed by border closures. “This belief was fatally mistaken,” argues Ruud Koopmans. “Travel restrictions should be given much greater weight,” he urges. “This holds true for containing upcoming waves of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as similar pandemics in the future.”

The study draws on sociological accounts of network diffusion and shows that countries that are heavily exposed to international travel and tourism – such as  France, Italy, and the USA – recorded significantly higher numbers of deaths. At the same time, death rates in countries more at the margins of international travel networks as well as in island states remained comparatively low.

In view of this key role of international travel flows, the study examines the effects of entry bans and mandatory quarantines on COVID-19 mortality. The earlier such travel restriction measures were implemented, the greater was their limiting effect on mortality. Crucially, travel restrictions needed to be in place before the local spread of the virus had spiraled out of control. If one compares countries that imposed travel restrictions until early March to countries that implement them from mid-March onward or not at all, mortality within the first group is an  estimated62 percentage points lower than in the second group.

Among the early adopters of travel restrictions with significantly lower death rates are countries such as Australia, Israel, and the Czech Republic. Germany, which introduced its first travel restrictions on 16 March, belongs to the late-adopter group, but countries such as Great Britain, France or Brazil responded even later.

The study shows that the type of travel restriction also plays a role. Mandatory quarantines for incoming travelers were more effective than entry bans. A plausible explanation is that entry bans often include exceptions for both citizens and permanent residents. By contrast, quarantine measures tend to apply to all incoming travelers, regardless of their nationality or country of residence. The study further shows that targeted travel restrictions (represented in the study by entry bans and mandatory quarantines for travelers from China or Italy) were more effective than restrictions targeted against all foreign countries.

Reference: “A Virus That Knows No Borders? Exposure to and Restrictions of International Travel and the Global Diffusion of COVID-19” by Ruud Koopmans, October 2020, WZB Discussion Paper.

Ruud Koopmans is the Director of the Migration, Integration, Transnationalization Research Unit at WZB and a Professor of Sociology and Migration Research at the Humboldt-University of Berlin.

1 Comment on "Closing Borders and Stopping the COVID-19 Virus: WHO & EU Were “Fatally Mistaken”"

  1. The US began implementing travel bans in February, yet the article omits this very salient point. Also it was one of the first to ban China travel. Therefore it appears the US was ahead of the curve in correctly choosing the best response. Why doesn’t this article point this out? Please don’t tell me that science is now infected by politics? Uggh

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.