Deepening Astronomical Mystery: On the Hunt for a Missing Giant Black Hole

Black Hole Acretion Disk Illustration

Black hole illustration. Credit: Aurore Simonnet and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

  • Astronomers are searching for signs of a supermassive black hole in the galaxy cluster Abell 2261.
  • Nearly all large galaxies contain central black holes, and the galaxy in the middle of Abell 2261 is expected to contain a particularly massive one.
  • Scientists think this galaxy underwent a merger with another galaxy in the past, which could have caused a newly formed larger black hole to be ejected.
  • Despite careful searches with Chandra and other telescopes, astronomers do not yet know what happened to this giant black hole.

The mystery surrounding the whereabouts of a supermassive black hole has deepened.

Despite searching with NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have no evidence that a distant black hole estimated to weigh between 3 billion and 100 billion times the mass of the Sun is anywhere to be found.

This missing black hole should be in the enormous galaxy in the center of the galaxy cluster Abell 2261, which is located about 2.7 billion light-years from Earth. This composite image of Abell 2261 contains optical data from Hubble and the Subaru Telescope showing galaxies in the cluster and in the background, and Chandra X-ray data showing hot gas (colored pink) pervading the cluster. The middle of the image shows the large elliptical galaxy in the center of the cluster.

Nearly every large galaxy in the Universe contains a supermassive black hole in their center, with a mass that is millions or billions of times that of the Sun. Since the mass of a central black hole usually tracks with the mass of the galaxy itself, astronomers expect the galaxy in the center of Abell 2261 to contain a supermassive black hole that rivals the heft of some of the largest known black holes in the Universe.

Abell 2261 Optical Infrared X ray Composite

This image of Abell 2261 contains X-ray data from Chandra showing hot gas pervading the cluster as well as optical data from Hubble and the Subaru Telescope that show galaxies in the cluster and in the background. Astronomers used these telescopes to search the galaxy in the center of the image for evidence of a black hole, weighing between 3 and 100 billion times the Sun, that is expected to be there. No sign of this black hole was found, deepening a mystery about what is happening in this system. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ of Michigan/K. Gültekin; Optical: NASA/STScI and NAOJ/Subaru; Infrared: NSF/NOAO/KPNO

Using Chandra data obtained in 1999 and 2004 astronomers had already searched the center of Abell 2261’s large central galaxy for signs of a supermassive black hole. They looked for material that has been superheated as it fell towards the black hole and produced X-rays, but did not detect such a source.

Now, with new, longer Chandra observations obtained in 2018, a team led by Kayhan Gultekin from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor conducted a deeper search for the black hole in the center of the galaxy. They also considered an alternative explanation, in which the black hole was ejected from the host galaxy’s center. This violent event may have resulted from two galaxies merging to form the observed galaxy, accompanied by the central black hole in each galaxy merging to form one enormous black hole.

When black holes merge, they produce ripples in spacetime called gravitational waves. If the huge amount of gravitational waves generated by such an event were stronger in one direction than another, the theory predicts that the new, even more massive black hole would have been sent careening away from the center of the galaxy in the opposite direction. This is called a recoiling black hole.

Astronomers have not found definitive evidence for recoiling black holes and it is not known whether supermassive black holes even get close enough to each other to produce gravitational waves and merge; so far, astronomers have only verified the mergers of much smaller black holes. The detection of recoiling supermassive black holes would embolden scientists using and developing observatories to look for gravitational waves from merging supermassive black holes.

The galaxy at the center of Abell 2261 is an excellent cluster to search for a recoiling black hole because there are two indirect signs that a merger between two massive black holes might have taken place. First, data from the Hubble and Subaru optical observations reveal a galactic core — the central region where the number of stars in the galaxy in a given patch of the galaxy is at or close to the maximum value — that is much larger than expected for a galaxy of its size. The second sign is that the densest concentration of stars in the galaxy is over 2,000 light years away from the center of the galaxy, which is strikingly distant.

These features were first identified by Marc Postman from Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) and collaborators in their earlier Hubble and Subaru images, and led them to suggest the idea of a merged black hole in Abell 2261. During a merger, the supermassive black hole in each galaxy sinks toward the center of the newly coalesced galaxy. If they become bound to each other by gravity and their orbit begins to shrink, the black holes are expected to interact with surrounding stars and eject them from the center of the galaxy. This would explain Abell 2261’s large core. The off-center concentration of stars may also have been caused by a violent event such as the merger of two supermassive black holes and subsequent recoil of single, larger black hole that results.

Even though there are clues that a black hole merger took place, neither Chandra nor Hubble data showed evidence for the black hole itself. Gultekin and most of his co-authors, led by Sarah Burke-Spolaor from West Virginia University, had previously used Hubble to look for a clump of stars that might have been carried off by a recoiling black hole. They studied three clumps near the center of the galaxy, and examined whether the motions of stars in these clumps are high enough to suggest they contain a ten billion solar mass black hole. No clear evidence for a black hole was found in two of the clumps and the stars in the other one were too faint to produce useful conclusions.

They also previously studied observations of Abell 2261 with the NSF’s Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array. Radio emission detected near the center of the galaxy showed evidence that supermassive black hole activity had occurred there 50 million years ago, but does not indicate that the center of the galaxy currently contains such a black hole.

Abell 2261 Optical Radio


They then turned to Chandra to look for material that had been superheated and produced X-rays as it fell towards the black hole. While the Chandra data did reveal that the densest hot gas was not in the center of the galaxy, they did not reveal any possible X-ray signatures of a growing supermassive black hole — no X-ray source was found in the center of the cluster, or in any of the clumps of stars, or at the site of the radio emission.

The authors concluded that either there is no black hole at any of these locations, or that it is pulling material in too slowly to produce a detectable X-ray signal.

The mystery of this gigantic black hole’s location therefore continues. Although the search was unsuccessful, hope remains for astronomers looking for this supermassive black hole in the future. Once launched, the James Webb Space Telescope may be able to reveal the presence of a supermassive black hole in the center of the galaxy or one of the clumps of stars. If Webb is unable to find the black hole, then the best explanation is that the black hole has recoiled well out of the center of the galaxy.

A paper describing these results has been published in a journal of the American Astronomical Society. Gultekin’s co-authors are Sarah Burke-Spolaor; Tod R. Lauer (National Optical Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, Tucson, Arizona); T. Joseph W. Lazio and Leonidas A. Moustakas (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California); and Patrick Ogle and Marc Postman (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland).

Reference: “Chandra Observations of Abell 2261 Brightest Cluster Galaxy, a Candidate Host to a Recoiling Black Hole” by Kayhan Gültekin, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Tod R. Lauer, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Leonidas A. Moustakas, Patrick Ogle and Marc Postman, 5 January 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc483

NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center manages the Chandra program. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Chandra X-ray Center controls science from Cambridge Massachusetts and flight operations from Burlington, Massachusetts.

12 Comments on "Deepening Astronomical Mystery: On the Hunt for a Missing Giant Black Hole"

  1. Harold A Leslie | January 10, 2021 at 5:33 am | Reply

    i would think a missed merger of two black holes,the smaller one being propelled
    away from the larger one,would pull nearby stars along with it.while the larger
    one would keep some stars as well?

    • Torbjörn Larsson | January 10, 2021 at 3:02 pm | Reply

      I don’t think they see evidence of missed mergers, but that the recoil kick from a merger shows up in models.

      “A natural way to form massive BHs is through repeated mergers, detectable via gravitational wave emission with current LIGO/Virgo or future LISA and ET observations. Nuclear star clusters (NSCs) have masses and densities high enough to retain most of the merger products, which acquire a recoil kick at the moment of merger.” [ ]

  2. It could be that the blacksphere (blackhole) at the center of the galaxie has gone dark. What I mean by that is it has stopped spinning no fuel left no event horizon. That might be why the galaxie is oliptical? Is there lots of gas probly not I think it’s right their it’s just not active any longer. Could be due to a collision. But if it’s not actively rotating or feeding than there wouldn’t be an event horizon and no shadow just a guess.

    • Torbjörn Larsson | January 10, 2021 at 3:10 pm | Reply

      They don’t see dust or cold gas when they look for possible obscuration.

      “We have determined that there is not significant obscuration preventing us from seeing black hole emission.”

      “The HST UV, optical, and NIR imaging shows no central dust lanes or color gradients associated with dust obscuration (Postman et al. 2012).”

      “We also find no evidence for large amounts of cold gas in A2261-BCG.”

      But such things would be expected when black holes are there, and they would give the accretion disks that feed the X-ray generation they are looking for. It is a remote possibility:

      “Thus we conclude that we have a clear view of any accreting black hole, but no X-ray point source emission is seen. It is still possible, however, that a 10^10 M_Sun black hole exists in one of the stellar knots of A2261-BCG but is accreting at such a low level that it does not produce sufficient X-ray emission to be noticeable above the cluster gas emission.”

      The event horizon is there if a black hole is there, it doesn’t matter of the black hole is quiescent or not – it’s a gravitational effect.

  3. From the photo in the article it looks like it’s stopped spinning are the stars moving around the center? A collision may have done that but you would expect some type observable event. The only thing I can say is it looks like it went dark?

  4. Please always remember that movement is a past of life..
    Stop the energy of the human eyes, because eyes is connected to this black hole..
    If your insight eyes see is because of this black hole, before we get there stop eyes insight

  5. Ignacio Esteban Dagnino | January 11, 2021 at 6:21 am | Reply

    Han tenido en cuenta la posibilidad de que al fusionarse dos agujeros negros supermasivos hayan desaparecido?

  6. Where did the super massive blackhole go? #solarionics proposed that the blackhole is being fed Quantum energy from #theoriginalprotoplasma via #neoprotoplasma. The fact we have turquoise Coronal Ring energy and intense UV range QUANTUMIZED via #neoprotoplasma method of Quantum is not able to fully exist in duality although permeable but uses #neoprotoplasma
    which is transformational at base level to morph split protons to whole Quantum particle which is #theoriginalprotoplasma which is coming through star plasma and other -0 Quantum field recyclecycle energy at 0point may explain the true phenomena that are blackholes.

  7. Maybe its just very good at hide and seek

  8. I believe through a lot of galactic collisions the black hole was sent into an orbit much farther from the center of the axis. It’s probably maintaining a lopsided orbit with a good chunk of stars as counterweights. If it’s a huge black hole, it may not necessarily be in the typical location one would expect. If this orbit is too elongated, they’ll never be able to find it.

  9. Black hole is responsible for birth of solar system and galaxy according to my theory before birth of sun and galaxy sun normal black hole and supermassive black hole produced and attract the every particle and apply pressure.inside the black hole due to opposite force particles become in motion with more speed and velocity radiant energy black hole become convert into sun. black hole is not a hole but core of star which lose our energy then attract every other particle for new birth

  10. Just stop this science fiction stuff. Spend the money on earth, we need it.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.