Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Space»Experts Explain: If There Is Life on Venus, How Could It Have Gotten There?
    Space

    Experts Explain: If There Is Life on Venus, How Could It Have Gotten There?

    By University of New South WalesSeptember 26, 202012 Comments7 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit

    Venus Surface Illustration

    Considering what we know about the key ingredients for life’s formation on Earth, here are three explanations for how this process may have occurred on our sister planet.

    The recent discovery of phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus is exciting, as it may serve as a potential sign of life (among other possible explanations).

    The researchers, who published their findings in Nature Astronomy, couldn’t really explain how the phosphine got there.

    They explored all conceivable possibilities, including lightning, volcanoes, and even delivery by meteorites. But each source they modeled couldn’t produce the amount of phosphine detected.

    Most phosphine in Earth’s atmosphere is produced by living microbes. So the possibility of life on Venus producing phosphine can’t be ignored.

    But the researchers, led by UK astronomer Jane Greaves, say their discovery “is not robust evidence for life” on Venus. Rather, it’s evidence of “anomalous and unexplained chemistry,” of which biological processes are just one possible origin.

    If life were to exist on Venus, how could it have come about? Exploring the origins of life on Earth might shed some light.

    The ingredients for life (as we know it)

    Understanding how life formed on Earth not only helps us understand our own origins, but could also provide insight into the key ingredients needed for life, as we know it, to form.

    The details around the origins of life on Earth are still shrouded in mystery, with multiple competing scientific theories. But most theories include a common set of environmental conditions considered vital for life. These are:

    Liquid water

    Water is needed to dissolve the molecules needed for life, to facilitate their chemical reactions. Although other solvents (such as methane) have been suggested to potentially support life, water is most likely. This is because it can dissolve a huge range of different molecules and is found throughout the universe.

    Mild temperatures

    Temperatures higher than 122°C destroy most complex organic molecules. This would make it almost impossible for carbon-based life to form in very hot environments.

    A process to concentrate molecules

    As the origin of life would have required a large amount of organic molecules, a process to concentrate organics from the diluted surrounding environment would be required – either through absorption onto mineral surfaces, evaporation, or floating on top of water in oily slicks.

    A complex natural environment

    For life to have originated, there would have had to be a complex natural environment wherein a diverse range of conditions (temperature, pH, and salt concentrations) could create chemical complexity. Life itself is incredibly complex, so even the most primitive versions would need a complex environment to originate.

    Trace metals

    A range of trace metals, amassed through water-rock interactions, would be needed to promote the formation of organic molecules.

    So if these are the conditions required for life, what does that tell us about the likelihood of life forming on Venus?

    NASA Planet Venus
    Venus has 90 times the atmospheric pressure of Earth. Credit: NASA

    It’s unlikely today …

    The possibility of life as we know it forming on the surface of present-day Venus is incredibly low. An average surface temperature above 400℃ means the surface can’t possibly have liquid water and this heat would also destroy most organic molecules.

    Venus’s milder upper atmosphere, however, has temperatures low enough for water droplets to form and thus could potentially be suitable for the formation of life.

    That said, this environment has its own limitations, such as clouds of sulfuric acid which would destroy any organic molecules not protected by a cell. For example, on Earth, molecules such as DNA are rapidly destroyed by acidic conditions, although some bacteria can survive in extremely acidic environments.

    Also, the constant falling of water droplets from Venus’s atmosphere down to its extremely hot surface would destroy any unprotected organic molecules in the droplets.

    Beyond this, with no surfaces or mineral grains in the Venusian atmosphere on which organic molecules could concentrate, any chemical building blocks for life would be scattered through a diluted atmosphere – making it incredibly difficult for life to form.

    … but possibly less unlikely in the past

    Bearing all this in mind, if atmospheric phosphine is indeed a sign of life on Venus, there are three main explanations for how it could have formed.

    Life may have formed on the planet’s surface when its conditions were very different from now.

    Modeling suggests the surface of early Venus was very similar to early Earth, with lakes (or even oceans) of water and mild conditions. This was before a runaway greenhouse effect turned the planet into the hellscape it is today.

    Eistla Regio Venus Surface
    This is a computer-generated picture of the Eistla Regio region on Venus’s surface. Credit: NASA

    If life formed back then, it might have adapted to spread into the clouds. Then, when intense climate change boiled the oceans away – killing all surface-based life – microbes in the clouds would have become the last outpost for life on Venus.

    Another possibility is that life in Venus’s atmosphere (if there is any) came from Earth.

    The planets of our inner solar system have been documented to exchange materials in the past. When meteorites crash into a planet, they can send that planet’s rocks hurtling into space where they occasionally intersect with the orbits of other planets.

    If this happened between Earth and Venus at some point, the rocks from Earth may have contained microbial life that could have adapted to Venus’s highly acidic clouds (similar to Earth’s acid-resistant bacteria).

    Asteroid Planet Atmosphere
    If rocks from Earth containing microbial life entered Venus’s orbit in the past, this life may have adapted to Venus’s atmospheric conditions.

    A truly alien explanation

    The third explanation to consider is that a truly alien form of life (life as we don’t know it) could have formed on Venus’s 400°C (750°F) surface and survives there to this day.

    Such a foreign life probably wouldn’t be carbon-based, as nearly all complex carbon molecules break down at extreme temperatures.

    Although carbon-based life produces phosphine on Earth, it’s impossible to say only carbon-based life can produce phosphine. Therefore, even if totally alien life exists on Venus, it may produce molecules that are still recognizable as a potential sign of life.

    It’s only through further missions and research that we can find out whether there is, or was, life on Venus. As prominent scientist Carl Sagan once said: “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

    Luckily, two of the four finalist proposals for NASA’s next round of funding for planetary exploration are focused on Venus.

    These include VERITAS, an orbiter proposed to map the surface of Venus, and DAVINCI+, proposed to drop through the planet’s skies and sample different atmospheric layers on the way down.

    Written by Luke Steller, a PhD Student at UNSW and Martin Van Kranendonk, Professor and Head of School at UNSW.

    Reference: “Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus” by Jane S. Greaves, Anita M. S. Richards, William Bains, Paul B. Rimmer, Hideo Sagawa, David L. Clements, Sara Seager, Janusz J. Petkowski, Clara Sousa-Silva, Sukrit Ranjan, Emily Drabek-Maunder, Helen J. Fraser, Annabel Cartwright, Ingo Mueller-Wodarg, Zhuchang Zhan, Per Friberg, Iain Coulson, E’lisa Lee and Jim Hoge, 14 September 2020, Nature Astronomy.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41550-020-1174-4

    Adapted from an article originally published on The Conversation.The Conversation

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Astrobiology Popular University of New South Wales Venus
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    New Findings Suggest Venus Never Had Oceans, Conditions Needed for Life

    Life on Venus? Scientists Shed More Light on Molecules Linked to Life on Other Planets

    Earth Has a Hot New Neighbor – And It Could Change How We Look for Life in the Universe

    Purported Phosphine – An Indicator of Life – On Venus More Likely to Be Ordinary Sulfur Dioxide

    Signs of Life on Venus? What This Means for Earthlings

    If It Wasn’t for Jupiter, Venus Might Be Habitable Today

    What Is Phosphine and Why Does It Point to Extra-Terrestrial Life Floating in the Clouds of Venus?

    Astronomers Find Possible Signs of Life on Venus

    The Clouds of Venus Could Have Conditions Conducive to Microbial Life

    12 Comments

    1. Kidlat Bangis on September 26, 2020 7:01 am

      Why would your care about Venus when back home you have no idea how to end the deadly virus?

      Reply
      • EngineerExO on September 27, 2020 8:47 am

        @Kidlat, why would you care to read a science article if you don’t have any scientific curiosity? If you believe the only thing that is important for scientific minds to work on is stopping a deadly virus then considered this, the open and curious mind can learn much from the scientific study of various realms of nature, and something we learn here may unexpectedly lead to a discovery that may save lives in unknown ways in the future.

        Reply
      • HoehneBadger on September 28, 2020 9:41 am

        As that little kid who looks like Dora the Explorer says “Why not both?”

        Reply
    2. Joe Milosch on September 27, 2020 5:01 am

      As the line in a popular movie goes: “Nature finds a way”.

      Reply
    3. Tim M on September 27, 2020 6:23 am

      “Experts Explain: If There Is Life on Venus, How Could It Have Got There?”

      How could it get there?….
      Or How could it have gotten there?

      Reply
      • Mike O'Neill on September 27, 2020 1:13 pm

        Thank you for your comment. The headline has been updated.

        Reply
    4. Misc on September 27, 2020 7:35 am

      Maybe Russian space probes from 1970s brought microbes from earth that can survive in atmosphere of Venus… it’s not impossible for them to survive in upper atmosphere if temperature is the same..

      Reply
    5. Mark A Jiminez on September 27, 2020 9:22 am

      It would be nice if the headline would have been written properly. The title was such a mess I came to the comments before I read the story.

      How could it have gotten there? How did it get there?

      Either one of these would have made the title a better read.

      Reply
    6. Aaron on September 27, 2020 10:16 am

      *gotten

      Reply
    7. Robert on September 27, 2020 12:08 pm

      I would be curious to know what the thinking is about underground life on Venus – after all, most life on Earth is actually underground, not on the surface

      Reply
    8. Josh on September 27, 2020 12:26 pm

      Perhaps there’s a God of the universe that can create life anywhere. And perhaps, He made Himself known to some of His creatures.

      Reply
    9. Cheese garry on June 19, 2021 5:28 am

      “Temperatures higher than 122°C destroy most complex organic molecules. This would make it almost impossible for carbon-based life to form in very hot environments.”
      If you are talking about any life in genral that is not right. It is not impossible for life, it is only impossible for human life.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Breakthrough Bowel Cancer Trial Leaves Patients Cancer-Free for Nearly 3 Years

    Natural Compound Shows Powerful Potential Against Rheumatoid Arthritis

    100,000-Year-Old Neanderthal Fossils in Poland Reveal Unexpected Genetic Connections

    Simple “Gut Reset” May Prevent Weight Gain After Ozempic or Wegovy

    2.8 Days to Disaster: Scientists Warn Low Earth Orbit Could Suddenly Collapse

    Common Food Compound Shows Surprising Power Against Superbugs

    5 Simple Ways To Remember More and Forget Less

    The Atomic Gap That Could Cost the Semiconductor Industry Billions

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Powerful Antioxidant Found To Play a Key Role in Proper Protein Folding
    • MIT Laser Breakthrough Lets Scientists Watch Drugs Enter the Brain in Real Time
    • Study Reveals Malaria’s Hidden Role in Human Evolution
    • Scientists Print Artificial Neurons That Can Talk to the Brain
    • Bowel and Ovarian Cancers Are Dramatically Rising in Young Adults and Scientists Aren’t Sure Why
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.