Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance – Scientists Unveil Over 10,000 Drug Combinations

A scientific illustration shows how antimicrobial drugs targeting different components of bacterial cells can influence each other’s activity. Credit: Isabel Romero Calvo and Elisabetta Cacace/EMBL

In an extensive investigation, EMBL scientists have tested over 10,000 drug combinations against some of the leading pathogenic bacteria carrying antimicrobial resistance and causing mortality.

Antimicrobial resistance, where pathogens withstand antibiotic treatment, stands as a pressing global health challenge. A 2022 study revealed that almost five million fatalities in 2019 were linked to bacteria resistant to antibiotics, with over one million of those deaths directly resulting from antimicrobial resistance.

In a new study, researchers from the Typas Group at EMBL Heidelberg have systematically profiled over 10,000 drug combinations for their effectiveness against common multidrug-resistant bacteria.

“Previously, there have been studies on specific drug combinations, especially those commonly prescribed together in the clinic,” said Elisabetta Cacace, the first author of the study and former PhD student in the Typas group. “However, we lacked systematic knowledge of how combinations of different classes of antibiotics, or combinations of antibiotics and non-antibiotic drugs, influence bacterial physiology, especially when considered independently of the host.” 

Cacace, who is trained as a medical doctor and is currently a postdoc at ETH Zürich, has been interested in antimicrobial resistance since early in her career. During her time in the Typas Group, which specializes in developing high-throughput approaches to studying bacterial interactions (with the environment or other species) and physiology, she turned her attention to the problem of understanding how antibiotics influence each other’s actions on their cellular targets.  

Different antibiotics target different cellular structures or processes inside bacteria. They can synergize, which means their combined activity is more potent than the effect of each drug alone, but they can also antagonize each other, in which case the presence of one drug hampers the activity of another. Such antagonizing interactions can be used to mitigate the collateral damage of antibiotics on our gut microbiota.

In a previous study, researchers from the Typas Group had profiled drug combinations against Gram-negative bacteria – a class that includes many deadly antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including E. coli, Salmonella enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, many deadly antimicrobial-resistant bacteria also belong to the Gram-positive category, including Staphylococcus aureus, whose methicillin-resistant variant (MRSA) causes hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. These bacteria have a different cell wall structure to Gram-negative bacteria, which influences the activity and effectiveness of drugs. 

For the current study, the team used a sophisticated robotics set-up to simultaneously study the effects of hundreds of combinations of antibiotic and non-antibiotic drugs, across a range of doses, on three representative species of Gram-positive bacteria – Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. In addition to over 8,000 combinations of 65 different antibiotics, spread across all major classes, the researchers also profiled over 2,500 combinations of antibiotic drugs with non-antibiotic drugs, which may be co-prescribed in an age where polypharmacy – the simultaneous use of multiple medications – is very common.

Using this strategy, the team identified over a thousand interactions, including both synergies and antagonisms. The effects were highly species- and even strain-specific, and distinct from the interactions seen in the previous study in Gram-negative bacteria. They also validated some of these results in vivo, by infecting moth larvae with the pathogen and testing the ability of specific drug combinations to aid in recovery. 

The researchers have made the full database of interactions openly available for other scientists to view, explore, and use to search for new synergies and antagonisms.

“We think the scale of this study really sets it apart. This is such a rich dataset that I think it will feed hypotheses for many years to come,” said Cacace. “I also find it interesting from a systems biology perspective, because we see interactions between drugs targeting certain cellular processes that were not known before.”

“We are living in an era when novel strategies against antimicrobial resistance are desperately needed, and the development of new antibiotics is technically challenging, costly, and time-consuming,” said Nassos Typas, EMBL Group Leader and the study’s senior author. “Systematic drug interaction profiling of the kind we have performed in this study opens up the path to alternative solutions and treatments for bacterial infections.”

Reference: “Systematic analysis of drug combinations against Gram-positive bacteria” by Elisabetta Cacace, Vladislav Kim, Vallo Varik, Michael Knopp, Manuela Tietgen, Amber Brauer-Nikonow, Kemal Inecik, André Mateus, Alessio Milanese, Marita Torrissen Mårli, Karin Mitosch, Joel Selkrig, Ana Rita Brochado, Oscar P. Kuipers, Morten Kjos, Georg Zeller, Mikhail M. Savitski, Stephan Göttig, Wolfgang Huber and Athanasios Typas, 28 September 2023, Nature Microbiology.
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-023-01486-9