A study carried out by a team of researchers at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC) has shown that an unusually thin structure of stars, recently discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope, could be a galaxy seen edge-on. This finding goes against the original interpretation in which a fleeing supermassive black hole was leaving a trail of stars in its wake. The new interpretation is published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics Letters.
A mysterious trail of stars formed eight billion years ago and recently discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope has been a challenge to a number of research groups. Its size is similar to that of the Milky Way, and this very long narrow structure has given rise to several explanations of its origin.
According to a controversial initial hypothesis, this trail of stars could be the result of the passage of a supermassive black hole through a huge cloud of gas. This idea quickly fired the imagination of the astronomical community, because it needs a large set of complex exceptional circumstances. For this reason, several scientific teams have continued to explore different, and less exotic scenarios which can explain the observations.
In a recent study, researchers at the IAC have reached the conclusion that this unusual structure of stars could be interpreted as a galaxy without a bulge seen edge-on. This type of galaxies, also called thin, or flat galaxies, are relatively common. “The motions, the size, and the quantity of stars fits what has been seen in galaxies within the local universe” explains Jorge Sanchez Almeida, an IAC researcher who is the first author of the article. “It’s a relief to have found the solution to this mystery, the new proposed scenario is much simpler. In one sense it is also a pity, because the existence of fleeing black holes is expected, and this could have been the first one to be observed.”
To support the hypothesis of the interpretation in terms of a galaxy, the team compared the mysterious structure with a well-known local galaxy without a bulge, IC5249, which has a similar mass of stars, and found surprising agreement. In the words of Mireia Montes, an IAC researcher who is a co-author of the article, “When we analyzed the velocities of this distant structure of stars we realized that they were very similar to those obtained from the rotation of galaxies, so we decided to compare a much closer galaxy, and found that they are extraordinarily similar.”
“We also looked at the relation between the mass of the assumed galaxy and its máximum velocity of rotation, and discovered that indeed it is a galaxy which behaves like a galaxy,” states Ignacio Trujillo, an IAC researcher who has taken part in the study. “It is an interesting object, because it is quite a large galaxy at a very large distance from Earth, where the majority of the galaxies are smaller,” he adds.
Upcoming observations will allow the study of this object in greater detail.
Reference: “Supermassive black hole wake or bulgeless edge-on galaxy?” by Jorge Sánchez Almeida, Mireia Montes and Ignacio Trujillo, 12 May 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics Letters.
So much for the “settled science” gaggle of the likes of Bill neigh,the unscientific guy (but he does sleep at an intergalactic motel 666), Neil eat the grass (who actually thinks that zer sounds like james earl Jones from Arby’s),etc….
Confirmation bias is the easiest, yet laziest method for judging what is true.
Science evolves, try it.
Human knowledge of the Universe is slightly above ZERO……
I can understand how Dark Matter experts could miss a bulge-free very thin galaxy. Probably too busy mapping their favorite cold gravity-concealing centralized halo concoctions and random hot-looking disorganized galaxies, when they aren’t silently thanking MOND experts for making them appear relatively intelligent by “modifying gravity” without having the slightest understanding of it. Emergent retro-reflection in quantum-scale gravitational effect information flows from cooling matter.
Another thing gravity experts seem clueless about is entanglement, particularly in California (ER=EPR). Is the galaxy flat and bulge-free due to something about wormholes, or is it due to emerged quantum-scale focus in cooled galactic gravity flows?
WHY would you say “Eight thousand million years”?? Why wouldn’t you just say 8 billion years??? What you said is a hundred times more complicated and difficult to understand than just using the ACTUAL number would be…
Thanks for the feedback, this has been updated.