
Researchers have finally solved how the ancient people of Rapa Nui moved their massive moai statues across Easter Island.
By combining physics, 3D modeling, and real-world experiments, scientists discovered that the statues were designed to “walk” upright through a clever rocking motion.
The Mystery of the Walking Statues
For generations, scientists have been fascinated by how the ancient people of Rapa Nui managed to move the island’s enormous moai statues. Now, through a mix of physics, 3D modeling, and hands-on experiments, researchers, including faculty from Binghamton University (State University of New York), have shown that the statues could quite literally “walk” with the help of ropes and a surprisingly small group of people.
After examining nearly 1,000 of the stone figures, Binghamton University anthropologist Carl Lipo and University of Arizona researcher Terry Hunt concluded that the islanders probably used ropes to rock the statues from side to side, guiding them forward in a zigzag pattern along specially constructed roads.

How the Moai “Walked” Themselves
Lipo and his team had earlier demonstrated through practical experiments that the moai could have been moved upright by rocking them back and forth, rather than dragging them horizontally on wooden sleds as older theories suggested.
“Once you get it moving, it isn’t hard at all – people are pulling with one arm. It conserves energy, and it moves really quickly,” said Lipo. “The hard part is getting it rocking in the first place. The question is, if it’s really large, what would it take? Are the things that we saw experimentally consistent with what we would expect from a physics perspective?”
Field experiments revealed that using rope and a small group of people, the people of Rapa Nui could have “walked” the moai statues. Credit: Carl Lipo
Testing the Theory With 3D Models and Replica Statues
To understand how even larger statues might have moved, the researchers built high-resolution 3D models of the moai and pinpointed specific design traits—such as broad D-shaped bases and a forward tilt—that made the statues more stable and easier to rock in a walking motion.
The team then tested their hypothesis by constructing a 4.35-ton replica moai featuring the same forward-leaning design. With a team of just 18 people, they successfully moved the replica 100 meters in only 40 minutes, achieving far better results than earlier transport experiments using other methods.
“The physics makes sense,” said Lipo. “What we saw experimentally actually works. And as it gets bigger, it still works. All the attributes that we see about moving gigantic ones only get more and more consistent the bigger and bigger they get, because it becomes the only way you could move it.”

Roads Built for Movement
Adding to the support for this theory are the roads of Rapa Nui. Measuring 4.5 meters wide with a concave cross-section, the roads were ideal for stabilizing the statues as they moved forward.
“Every time they’re moving a statue, it looks like they’re making a road. The road is part of moving the statue,” said Lipo. “We actually see them overlapping each other, and many parallel versions of them. What they are probably doing is clearing a path, moving it, clearing another, clearing it further, and moving it right in certain sequences. So they’re spending a lot of time on the road part.”

Challenging the Skeptics
Lipo said that nothing else currently explains how the moai were moved. The challenge to anyone else is to prove them wrong.
“Find some evidence that shows it couldn’t be walking. Because nothing we’ve seen anywhere disproves that,” said Lipo. “In fact, everything we ever see and ever thought of keeps strengthening the argument.”
Lipo said Rapa Nui is notorious for wild theories backed by zero evidence. This research is an example of putting a theory to the test.
“People have spun all kinds of tales about stuff that’s plausible or possible in some way, but they never go about evaluating the evidence to show that, in fact, you can learn about the past and explain the record that you see in ways that are fully scientific,” said Lipo. “One of the steps is simply saying, ‘Look, we can build an answer here.’”

Honoring the Genius of the Rapa Nui
Lipo said that the research also honors the people of Rapa Nui, who achieved a monumental engineering feat with limited resources.
“It shows that the Rapa Nui people were incredibly smart. They figured this out,” said Lipo. “They’re doing it the way that’s consistent with the resources they have. So it really gives honor to those people, saying, look at what they were able to achieve, and we have a lot to learn from them in these principles.”
The paper was published in the Journal of Archaeological Science.
Reference: “The walking moai hypothesis: Archaeological evidence, experimental validation, and response to critics” by Carl P. Lipo and Terry L. Hunt, 4 October 2025, Journal of Archaeological Science.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2025.106383
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
9 Comments
This is not a new idea it was put forward many years ago. Pavel in the 1980s.
Previous article on sci tech daily said the replica they used earlier to demonstrate the method was not accurate enough
Reference: “The ‘walking’ megalithic statues (moai) of Easter Island” by Carl P. Lipo, Terry L. Hunt and Sergio Rapu Haoa, 5 October 2012, Journal of Archaeological Science.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.029
Thor Heyerdahl.
This is VERY OLD information. 2012? I have shoes older than this.
Came to tell exactly that.
Out of science comes commerce: stand by at your local Big Box Construction Materials store for the forthcoming kit, labeled “You Can Have Your Very Own Back Yard Moai 9-meter (29-1/2 foot) Reinforced Repop Concrete Icon!”
Besides the fact that the theory is old, there is something else. There are moai that have not only a visible, but also an invisible part of them underground. That is, much higher. In my opinion, the demonstrated method will not work when the height of the statue is twice as large, for example. The same simple physical principles.
They used a 4.5ish ton replica…thats nice..the average weight of one is over 12 tons…their theory doesn’t make sense for an item 3x in weight.
As correctly pointed out by some people here, this has been done already, some fifty years ago, by Czech Pavel Pavel. There are some videos on YouTube showing his experiments that he has conducted with Thor Heyerdahl.