New Catalyst Could Provide Liquid Hydrogen Fuel of the Future

Chemistry Catalyst Concept

Researchers are developing a hydrogen-based car fuel system with zero greenhouse emissions, using a liquid converted by a catalyst. The method, still under research, faces challenges like catalyst durability and the eco-friendliness of hydrogen production, highlighting the need for political support for renewable energy.

Researchers at Lund University in Sweden have developed an innovative car fuel system that operates in a circular manner, minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. This system utilizes a unique liquid that, when combined with a solid catalyst, transforms into hydrogen fuel for the car. After usage, the spent liquid is removed from the vehicle’s tank and recharged with hydrogen, making it ready for reuse. This process forms a closed-loop system that significantly reduces environmental impact.

In two research articles, Lund researchers have demonstrated that the method works, and while it is still basic research, it has the potential to become an efficient energy-storage system in the future.

“Our catalyst is one of the most efficient around, at least if you look at publicly available research,” says Ola Wendt, professor at the Department of Chemistry at Lund University, and one of the authors.

Addressing Climate Impact and Exploring Hydrogen Gas

Finding alternative ways of producing, storing, and transforming energy in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels is necessary to reduce the impact on the climate. One way involves much-talked-about hydrogen gas, which many see as a future solution for energy storage. Nature stores energy in chemical bonds, and hydrogen contains the highest energy density in relation to its weight.

“However, gas can be difficult to handle, so we are looking at liquid fuel charged with hydrogen that can be delivered at a pump, in a way broadly similar to what happens at petrol stations today,” says Ola Wendt.

The concept is known as LOHC (liquid organic hydrogen carriers) and is not new as such. The challenge is in finding as efficient a catalyst as possible, that can extract the hydrogen from the liquid.

The system is intended to work using a liquid that is “charged” with hydrogen. The liquid is pumped through a solid catalyst which extracts the hydrogen. This can be used in a fuel cell – which converts chemical fuel to electricity – while the “spent” liquid carries on to another tank. The only emission is water.

Refueling and Large Scale Production

The spent liquid can then be emptied at a filling station before refueling with new, charged liquid. This would probably mean large-scale production of the substance, comparable to today’s oil refineries. 

“We converted more than 99 percent of the hydrogen gas that was present in the liquid,” says Ola Wendt.

Researchers have also been calculating whether it might be possible to use the fuel for larger vehicles such as buses, trucks, and aircraft.

“With the large tanks that they have, it might be possible to cover almost the same distance as you can with a tank of diesel. You would also convert around 50 percent more energy compared to compressed hydrogen,” says Ola Wendt.

Components and Challenges

The liquids used are isopropanol (which is a common ingredient in screenwash) and 4-methylpiperidine.

Does this sound a little too good to be true? Yes – for now at least, a number of challenges remain. One is that the lifespan of the catalyst is rather limited. Another is that iridium, which the catalyst is based on, is a precious metal.

“But we estimate that you need about two grams of iridium per car. This could be compared to today’s exhaust-cleaning catalytic converters, which contain about three grams of platinum, palladium, and rhodium, which are also precious metals,” says Ola Wendt.

This is a technical solution based on basic research. If a decision was made to go for a finished product, Ola Wendt believes that the concept could be ready in ten years’ time – provided that it is economically viable and that there is interest from society.

Another problem is how hydrogen is produced – today, most production is not climate-friendly. The hydrogen then needs to be stored and transported in an effective way, which is not that straightforward today. There are also the risks of refueling with compressed hydrogen. The Lund researchers hope to solve this with their method.

“Ninety-eight percent of all hydrogen today is fossil-based, produced from natural gas. The byproduct is carbon dioxide. From an environmental point of view, the notion of producing hydrogen for steel, batteries, and fuel is pointless if it is done using natural gas,” says Ola Wendt, but he explains that there is a lot of research going on into how “green hydrogen” might be produced by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen with the help of renewable energy.

At the same time, Ola Wendt believes that political decisions are required for renewable and climate-friendly alternatives to gain a proper foothold.

“It needs to be cheaper, and it takes political decisions. Renewables have no chance of competing with something that you just dig out of the ground, where transport is almost the only cost, as is the case with fossil fuels,” he concludes.

References: “Acceptorless dehydrogenation of 4-methylpiperidine by supported pincer-ligated iridium catalysts in continuous flow” by Kaushik Chakrabarti, Alice Spangenberg, Vasudevan Subramaniyan, Andreas Hederstedt, Omar Y. Abdelaziz, Alexey V. Polukeev, Reine Wallenberg, Christian P. Hulteberg and Ola F. Wendt, 27 July 2023, Catalysis Science & Technology.
DOI: 10.1039/D3CY00881A

“Iridium-Catalyzed Dehydrogenation in a Continuous Flow Reactor for Practical On-Board Hydrogen Generation From Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers” by Alexey V. Polukeev, Reine Wallenberg, Jens Uhlig, Christian P. Hulteberg and Ola F. Wendt, 9 March 2022, ChemSusChem.
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202200085

2 Comments on "New Catalyst Could Provide Liquid Hydrogen Fuel of the Future"

  1. This article is not accurate. 98 %?? Get your facts

  2. The title is misleading. “Liquid Hydrogen” has a specific definition different from what’s featured in the article. Please get the facts correctly before publishing.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.