SciPost Submission Page
Supersolid phase of a spinorbitcoupled BoseEinstein condensate: a perturbation approach
by Giovanni I. Martone, Sandro Stringari
Submission summary
As Contributors:  Giovanni Italo Martone 
Arxiv Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06425v2 (pdf) 
Date accepted:  20211008 
Date submitted:  20211001 10:02 
Submitted by:  Martone, Giovanni Italo 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approach:  Theoretical 
Abstract
The phase diagram of a BoseEinstein condensate with Ramaninduced spinorbit coupling includes a stripe phase with supersolid features. In this work we develop a perturbation approach to study the ground state and the Bogoliubov modes of this phase, holding for small values of the Raman coupling. We obtain analytical predictions for the most relevant observables (including the periodicity of stripes, sound velocities, compressibility, and magnetic susceptibility) which are in excellent agreement with the exact (non perturbative) numerical results, obtained for significantly large values of the coupling. We further unveil the nature of the two gapless Bogoliubov modes in the longwavelength limit. We find that the spin branch of the spectrum, corresponding in this limit to the dynamics of the relative phase between the two spin components, describes a translation of the fringes of the equilibrium density profile, thereby providing the crystal Goldstone mode typical of a supersolid configuration. Finally, using sumrule arguments, we show that the superfluid density can be experimentally accessed by measuring the ratio of the sound velocities parallel and perpendicular to the direction of the spinorbit coupling.
Current status:
Editorial decision:
For Journal SciPost Physics: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
Changes in response to remarks by Prof. Spielman:
 Below Eq. (8) we have briefly commented on the phase diagram for $g_{ss} < 0$;
 Below Eq. (9) we now state that $k_1$ is a parameter to be adjusted to find the ground state;
 In Sec. 3.1 we have enlarged the discussion on the characterisation of the $\Omega_R = 0$ states; to this purpose we have introduced the arbitrary phase $\chi_0$ in the formulas of this section (taken equal to $0$ in the calculations of the Appendices);
 In the paragraph below Eqs. (19)(21) we have commented on supersolid effects in current ${}^{87}$Rb experiments;
 Below Eqs. (44) and (45) we have commented on the involved dependence of the sound velocity on the interaction parameters, and we have discussed the occurrence of a dynamic instability at the spinodal point;
 On page 17 we have improved the discussion on the spin Goldstone mode at $\Omega_R = 0$ (also recalled in the conclusion);
 We have rewritten Eq. (55) of the previous version eliminating the $q \to  q$ notation.
Changes in response to remarks by Referee 2:
 In the introduction we have added a comment on the stripe phase of twodimensional dipolar gases;
 At the beginning of Sec. 2.2 we have added a comment on the quantum depletion in our system;
 In the paragraph below Eqs. (19)(21) we have improved the discussion on the experimental relevance of our results;
 On page 21 we now mention the availability of Monte Carlo calculations in our system (Ref. [54]);
 Again on page 21 we have added a paragraph comparing our results for the superfluid density with those of the Leggett criterion, and added the corresponding curves in Fig. 4 (a short comment has also been added in the conclusion).
Additional changes:
 In the introduction we have quoted further experimental [17,18,27] and theoretical [32,33] results;
 Below Eq. (6) we now explicitly state that the stability conditions $g > 0$ and $g_{dd} > 0$ are assumed;
 In Eq. (26) we now take $\lambda$ complex to eliminate the arbitrary phase $\phi$ introduced in Eqs. (40) of the previous submission;
 In Sec. 4.5 we have restored some missing mass factors;
 On page 20 we now state that the superfluid density in our system is an anisotropic tensor and that Eq. (60) holds in the symmetric intraspecies coupling case;
 In App. B.4 we have added a discussion and a new figure on the hybridisation of the crystal and superfluid modes in the stripe phase; correspondingly, the paragraph below Eqs. (46) in the main text has been amended;
 A few typos in the previous submission have been fixed;
 References [19,37] of the previous submission have been updated.