Scientists Issue Plan for Rewilding the West With Gray Wolf and North American Beaver

Gray Wolf

Scientists advocate for the restoration of two keystone species: the gray wolf (pictured here) and the North American beaver. Credit: Gary Kramer / USFWS

As the effects of climate change mount, ecosystem restoration in the US West has garnered significant public attention. This has been bolstered by President Joe Biden’s America the Beautiful plan to conserve 30% of US land and water by 2030. Writing in the journal BioScience, William J. Ripple and 19 colleagues follow up on the Biden plan with a proposal for a “Western Rewilding Network.” It comprises 11 large reserve areas on land already owned by the federal government. The authors advocate for the cessation of livestock grazing on some federal lands, coupled with the restoration of two keystone species: the gray wolf and the North American beaver.

According to the authors, wolves and beavers are renowned for their capacity to produce broad ecosystem effects. For example, they say, “by felling trees and shrubs and building dams, beavers enrich fish habitat, increase water and sediment retention, maintain water flows during drought, provide wet fire breaks, improve water quality, initiate recovery of incised channels, increase carbon sequestration, and generally enhance habitat for many riparian plant and animal species.” Wolves share a similar potential to reshape ecosystems, and “could assist in the natural control of overabundant native ungulates.” This would allow native vegetation to regrow in previously degraded areas.

The rewilding plan would produce profound cascading effects, according to the scientists. They say it could ultimately benefit many of the “92 threatened and endangered species across nine taxonomic groups: five amphibians, five birds, two crustaceans, 22 fishes, 39 flowering plants, five insects, 11 mammals, one reptile, and two snail species.”

A number of costs to their bold initiative are cited by the authors. These include payments to any livestock farmers, who should get just reimbursement for lost grazing allotments on federal lands. Ripple and colleagues argue that these challenges will ultimately prove navigable, in part because meat derived from forage on federal lands accounts for only about 2% of the nation’s production.

Furthermore, say the scientists, the moment is right for “ultra ambitious action,” given the “unprecedented period of converging crises in the American West, including extended drought and water scarcity, extreme heat waves, massive fires triggered at least partly by climate change, and biodiversity loss.”

Reference: “Rewilding the American West” by William J Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Michael K Phillips, Robert L Beschta, John A Vucetich, J Boone Kauffman, Beverly E Law, Aaron J Wirsing, Joanna E Lambert, Elaine Leslie, Carly Vynne, Eric Dinerstein, Reed Noss, George Wuerthner, Dominick A DellaSala, Jeremy T Bruskotter, Michael Paul Nelson, Eileen Crist, Chris Darimont and Daniel M Ashe, 9 August 2022, BioScience.
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac069

2 Comments on "Scientists Issue Plan for Rewilding the West With Gray Wolf and North American Beaver"

  1. “… America the Beautiful plan to conserve 30% of US land and water by 2030.”

    I suspect that “preserve” is a more accurate word than “conserve.” I further suspect that the long-term plan is to turn federal lands into large unfenced zoos or open-air terrariums where city dwellers can look, but not touch. The former concept of multiple use of federal lands seems to be falling out of favor with the young, yuppified urbanites for whom wild lands is an esoteric term that they have no real experience with, and only visit for a few days during Spring Break, or on Summer vacations.

  2. Beaver can be, and often are, pests in their own right. They flood pasture land intended for horses and/or cows, and can inundate rural roads. They can destroy shade that protects the soil from evaporating the water in it. Their goal is to modify the environment to their advantage.

    The article claims that beavers can “increase carbon sequestration.” It is just the opposite if they kill trees and shrubs. They often do this by felling trees, and by their ponds suffocating the roots. Furthermore, their ponds favor the anaerobic production of methane form the submerged biomass. Methane has been identified as a greenhouse gas, and the recent inappropriately named “Inflation Reduction Act of 2022” is attempting to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions. It is as though the government left hand doesn’t know what its other hand is doing.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.