For the first time, scientists have estimated how much energy is transferred from large to small scales within the magnetosheath, the boundary region between the solar wind and the magnetic bubble that protects our planet. Based on data collected by ESA’s Cluster and NASA’s THEMIS missions over several years, the study revealed that turbulence is the key, making this process a hundred times more efficient than in the solar wind.
The planets in the Solar System, including our Earth, are bathed in the solar wind, a supersonic flow of highly energetic, charged particles relentlessly released by the Sun. Our planet and a few others stand out in this all-pervasive stream of particles: these are the planets that have a magnetic field of their own, and so represent an obstacle to the sweeping power of the solar wind.
It is the interaction between Earth’s magnetic field and the solar wind that creates the intricate structure of the magnetosphere, a protective bubble that shields our planet from the vast majority of solar wind particles.
So far, scientists have achieved a fairly good understanding of the physical processes that take place in the solar wind plasma and in the magnetosphere. However, many important aspects are still missing regarding the interplay between these two environments and about the highly turbulent region that separates them, known as magnetosheath, where it is suspected that most of the interesting action happens.
“To learn how energy is transferred from the solar wind to the magnetosphere, we need to understand what goes on in the magnetosheath, the ‘grey area’ between them,” says Lina Zafer Hadid, from the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Uppsala, Sweden.
Lina is the lead author of a new study that quantifies, for the first time, the role of turbulence in the magnetosheath. The results are published today in Physical Review Letters.
“In the solar wind, we know that turbulence contributes to the dissipation of energy from large scales of hundreds of thousands of kilometers to smaller scales of a kilometer, where plasma particles are heated up and accelerated to higher energies,” explains co-author Fouad Sahraoui from the Laboratory of Plasma Physics in France.
“We suspected that a similar mechanism must be at play in the magnetosheath too, but we could never test it until now,” he adds.
The magnetosheath plasma is more turbulent, home to a greater extent of density fluctuations, and can be compressed to a much higher degree than the solar wind. As such, it is substantially more complex, and scientists have only in recent years developed the theoretical framework to study the physical processes taking place in such an environment.
Lina, Fouad, and their collaborators combed through a vast volume of data collected between 2007 and 2011 by the four spacecraft of ESA’s Cluster and two of the five spacecraft of NASA’s THEMIS missions, which fly in formation through Earth’s magnetic environment.
When they applied the recently developed theoretical tools to their data sample, they were in for a big surprise.
“We found that density and magnetic fluctuations caused by turbulence within the magnetosheath amplify the rate at which energy cascades from large to small scales by at least a hundred times with respect to what is observed in the solar wind,” explains Lina.
The new study indicates that about 10-13 J of energy is transferred per cubic meter every second in this region of Earth’s magnetic environment.
“We expected that compressible turbulence would have an impact on the energy transfer in magnetosheath plasma, but not that it would be so significant,” she adds.
In addition, the scientists were able to derive an empirical correlation that links the rate at which energy is dissipated in the magnetosheath with the fourth power of another quantity used to study the motion of fluids, the so-called turbulent Mach number. Named after Austrian physicist Ernst Mach, it quantifies the speed of fluctuations in a flow with respect to the speed of sound in that fluid, indicating whether a flow is subsonic or supersonic.
While the energy transfer rate is tricky to determine unless using space probes that take in situ measurements, like the Cluster spacecraft sampling the plasma around Earth, the Mach number can be more easily estimated using remote observations of a variety of astrophysical plasma beyond the realm of our planet.
“If this empirical relation turns out to be universal, it will be extremely useful to explore cosmic plasma that cannot be directly probed with spacecraft, such as the interstellar medium that pervades our Milky Way and other galaxies,” says Fouad.
The scientists are looking forward to comparing their results with measurements of the plasma surrounding other Solar System planets with an intrinsic magnetic field, for example using NASA’s Juno mission, currently at Jupiter, and ESA’s future Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer, and also the joint ESA-JAXA BepiColombo mission to Mercury that is scheduled for launch later this year.
“It is very exciting that a study based on several years of Cluster data has found the key to address a major, long unsolved question in plasma physics,” says Philippe Escoubet, Cluster Project Scientist at ESA.
Reference: “Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Earth’s Magnetosheath: Estimation of the Energy Cascade Rate Using in situ Spacecraft Data” by L. Z. Hadid, F. Sahraoui, S. Galtier and S. Y. Huang, 29 January 2018, Physical Review Letters.
I wonder… has this revelation just turned Einstein’s theory of gravity on its head?!
That theory proposes that all planetary bodies are “falling” around a funnel-like curvature of space caused by the presence of the sun. However, the question that has always puzzled me is; why do the planets not fall straight down the side of this funnel directly towards the star? Something must be resisting this direct fall and driving the diversion to an orbital path, despite the gravitational attraction of both bodies?
This then provides the answer; That 13 Joules is about 12 Kilotons of explosive energy expended upon every square metre of planet Earth’s magnetosphere every second- constantly from the direction of the Sun… the opposite direction towards which the Sun and Earth’s combined gravitational moment is acting.
Now I haven’t the data nor the mathematical talent to make the calculations, but I bet the two energies cancel each other out either completely or predominantly- resulting in the stable orbit this planet enjoys.
Jock, most of the planets are created while matter is spinning about a star. Try dropping a coin in one of those charity funnels to see if any of them head straight into the center. Centrifugal force creates forces which try to eject the coin or planet from the gravity well, while the gravitational force of the sun creates the opposite force trying to pull the planet into it. All of this takes a lot longer due to the vast distances involved than the funnel experiment. It also is extremely rare for even asteroids to head directly into the sun, although it probably does happen from time to time. Remember, the sun is relatively huge compared to all the planets, but the gravitational forces it creates with its mass, are offset by the spinning of the planets around it.
Hey Southy, I was having a laugh, mate. 😉
I wonder if that kind of energy transfer could be the source of an accelerated heating of the Earth’s atmosphere since other research has discovered the weakening of the Earth’s magnetic field over the last 150 years or so. 13 Joules of energy transfer/cubic meter with a greater amount actually making into the atmosphere over time due to the magnetosphere density dropping would just about account for the warming seen over the last 150 yrs? Haven’t seen any research into this source of energy but alot going into “man-made” global warming scenarios to ‘adjust’ human activity toward reduction of power expenditures. Hmmm…..