Study Suggests Andromeda Crashed into the Milky Way 10 Billion Years Ago

Andromeda Galaxy Collided with the Milky Way  10 Billion Years Ago

A schematic diagram showing how the Andromeda Galaxy (at bottom right) collided with the Milky Way (at the intersection of the axes) 10 billion years ago, moved out to a maximum distance of more than 3 million light-years, and is now approaching our Galaxy once again. The yellow line shows the track of Andromeda with respect to the Milky Way. Credit: Fabian Lueghausen / University of Bonn.

A new study suggests that Andromeda crashed into the Milky Way roughly 10 billion years ago, explaining the observed structure of the two galaxies and their satellites.

For many years scientists have believed that our Galaxy, the Milky Way, is set to crash into its larger neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy, in about 3 billion years’ time and that this will be the first time such a collision has taken place. But now a European team of astronomers led by Hongsheng Zhao of the University of St Andrews propose a very different idea; that the two star systems collided once before, some 10 billion years ago, and that our understanding of gravity is fundamentally wrong. Remarkably, this would neatly explain the observed structure of the two galaxies and their satellites, something that has been difficult to account for until now. Dr Zhao will present the new work at the RAS National Astronomy Meeting in St Andrews on Thursday 4 July.

The Milky Way, made up of about 200 billion stars, is part of a group of galaxies called the Local Group. Astrophysicists often theorize that most of the mass of the Local Group is invisible, made of so-called dark matter. Most cosmologists believe that across the whole universe, this matter outweighs ‘normal’ matter by a factor of five. The dark matter in both Andromeda and the Milky Way then makes the gravitational pull between the two galaxies strong enough to overcome the expansion of the cosmos, so that they are now moving towards each other at around 100 km per second, heading for a collision 3 billion years in the future.

Did Andromeda Crash into the Milky Way

An image of the Andromeda Galaxy (from top left to bottom right across the center), made using a filter that selects the light of the hydrogen alpha spectral line. Credit: Adam Evans.

But this model is based on the conventional model of gravity devised by Newton and modified by Einstein a century ago, and it struggles to explain some properties of the galaxies we see around us. Dr Zhao and his team argue that at present the only way to successfully predict the total gravitational pull of any galaxy or small galaxy group, before measuring the motion of stars and gas in it, is to make use of a model first proposed by Prof. Mordehai Milgrom of the Weizmann Institute in Israel in 1983.

This modified gravity theory (Modified Newtonian Dynamics or MOND) describes how gravity behaves differently on the largest scales, diverging from the predictions made by Newton and Einstein.

Dr Zhao (University of St Andrews) and his colleagues have for the first time used this theory to calculate the motion of Local Group galaxies. Their work suggests that the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies had a close encounter about 10 billion years ago. If gravity conforms to the conventional model on the largest scales then taking into account the supposed additional pull of dark matter, the two galaxies would have merged.

“Dark matter would work like honey: in a close encounter, the Milky Way and Andromeda would get stuck together, figuratively speaking”, says team member Prof. Pavel Kroupa from Bonn University. “But if Milgrom’s theory is right”, says his colleague Dr Benoit Famaey (Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg), “then there are no dark particles and the two large galaxies could have simply passed each other thereby drawing matter from each other into long thin tidal arms.”

New little galaxies would then form in these arms, “a process often observed in the present-day universe”, adds team member Fabian Lueghausen, also from Bonn. Dr Zhao explains: “The only way to explain how the two galaxies could come close to each other without merging is if dark matter isn’t there. Observational evidence for a past close encounter would then strongly support the Milgromian theory of gravity.”

Just such a signature might already have been found. Astronomers struggle to account for the distribution of dwarf galaxies in orbit around both the Milky Way and Andromeda. The dwarf galaxies could be explained if they were born from gas and stars ripped out of the two parent galaxies during their close encounter.

Pavel Kroupa sees this as the ‘smoking gun’ for the collision. “Given the arrangement and motion of the dwarf galaxies, I can’t see how any other explanation works”, he comments.

The team now plan to model the encounter using Milgromian dynamics and are developing a computer code at Bonn University for this purpose.

In the new model, the Milky Way and Andromeda are still going to crash into each other again in the next few billion years, but it will feel like ‘deja vu’. And the team believes that their discovery has profound consequences for our current understanding of the Universe. Pavel Kroupa concludes, “If we are right, the history of the cosmos will have to be rewritten from scratch.”

Reference: “Local Group timing in Milgromian dynamics – A past Milky Way-Andromeda encounter at z > 0.8” by H. Zhao, B. Famaey, F. Lüghausen and P. Kroupa, 14 August 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321879


3 Comments on "Study Suggests Andromeda Crashed into the Milky Way 10 Billion Years Ago"

  1. Tim Kozlof Jr | July 8, 2013 at 12:37 pm | Reply

    Look for a Gas bridge, like the one between M31 and M33, could be a clue!!

  2. Sultan Ahmed Naqis | August 15, 2018 at 11:03 am | Reply

    The concept of dark matter is unconvincing “theological style concept”. There is no solid scientific proof. The concept has been put forward to satisfy our half baked equations. Very unsatisfactory. Something is missing. On the very large scales our theory of gravity fails. Probably, large “volumes of space” work (differently) with gravity to strengthen it.

    • No, it’s not a “theological style concept.” Theology needs no empirical evidence – only some stone age myths and/or words of epileptic pedophiles. Dark matter is a valid scientific hypothesis, but it’s not yet a theory. I disagree with painting a valid hypothesis in the same brush as the stone age nonsense that kills people.

      That said, the dark matter hypothesis is extremely tenuous, and sometimes contradictory. I do personally agree with you that the concept of dark matter represents a gap in our understanding of gravity. The behavior of the galaxies in the bullet cluster that have supposedly lost their dark matter, for example, doesn’t square with the hypothesis.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.