Learning is more effective when retrieval is varied and spaced over time, not repetitive. Variety strengthens memory pathways and helps overcome false beliefs about easier methods.
How to learn effectively? To optimize learning, it’s crucial to retrieve information from memory at regular intervals. However, that’s just the starting point. For even greater success, it’s best to use varied methods of retrieval, scientists argue in a paper published in the prestigious journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Human memory is highly complex and influenced by many factors, making it difficult to translate findings from individual scientific studies into practical and universal learning tips. Nevertheless, previous studies suggest that learning is most effective when we retrieve the material from memory instead of simply re-reading it, and when learning sessions are spread over time, and not, for example, accumulated during one evening before an exam.
Is it possible to learn even more effectively?
Ewa Butowska-Buczyńska from the Faculty of Psychology in Warsaw at SWPS University, Maciej Hanczakowski, and Katarzyna Zawadzka from the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, and Paulina Kliś, a USWPS graduate, decided to find out whether the process of memorizing could be additionally supported. It turns out that it is possible. This requires so-called variable learning, which involves introducing variety into the way we memorize. This means learning about a given phenomenon from different perspectives, in different contexts, and in many ways. In addition, the process of retrieval should also be varied, that is, take place in response to different, not identical, cues leading to the correct answer.
In the paper which was recently published in PNAS, the authors describe a series of experiments in which they asked the participants to learn foreign (Finnish) words.
The words were embedded in sentences presented in participants’ native language, e.g., “Dad is sweeping the lattia” (Finnish: floor). During the study, each foreign word was presented multiple times, either in the same sentence (“Dad is sweeping the lattia” x5) or in different sentences (e.g. “Dad is sweeping the lattia.“, “A dog is lying on the lattia.”, “A child is playing on the lattia“. “There’s a carpet on the lattia.”, “A cat is sliding on the lattia.”).
Better memory performance for translations of foreign words was achieved when, during learning, participants were presented with different sentences rather than the same sentence over and over again. The benefits of this method of acquiring knowledge were observed both immediately after the study phase and after 24 hours.
Interestingly, the participants were convinced that it was easier for them to memorize foreign words when they learned them using always the same sentences, which was inconsistent with their actual test results. This is called a metacognitive illusion – a false belief in the effectiveness of certain learning conditions, which may ultimately lead to choosing less effective ways of learning.
Memory welcomes a challenge
The idea of learning different facets of information in each learning session is not new; it is considered crucial for long-term memory. It can be compared to creating multiple paths to memorized information, which can then be used to retrieve the information from memory. The more such paths we create while learning, the greater the chance of effectively retrieving the information we are looking for, when, for example, during an exam, we are asked a question that only fits one of the possible paths.
Such a diverse way of learning, where we are not limited to a single aspect of the to-be-learned information, is a challenge for our memory. It therefore requires more effort than learning in a constant and repetitive way, but this effort helps with acquiring knowledge. Therefore, we can say that some difficulty in the learning process is desirable.
If we want our knowledge to be useful, i.e., accessible in different circumstances and in response to different cues or questions on a test, we should enrich our study sessions with the following difficulties: retrieving previously learned information (instead of reading it multiple times), spreading learning over a period of time (instead of accumulating it in a single learning session), and retrieving information from memory in different ways (and not in response to the same cue), explains the study co-author, Ewa Butowska-Buczyńska, PhD, from the Faculty of Psychology in Warsaw, USWPS.
The authors of the paper suggest that the results of their research can be used to develop guidelines for effective learning. They emphasize, however, that the research to date is limited to specific experimental conditions and further work is needed to promote this way of learning on a larger scale.
Reference: “The role of variable retrieval in effective learning” by Ewa Butowska-Buczyńska, Paulina Kliś, Katarzyna Zawadzka and Maciej Hanczakowski, 25 October 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413511121
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
3 Comments
Hello
Test prep and learning are 2 different things. That’s why test scores should not be an indication of what students understand and have learned.
As a former teacher and as a parent, I have found that when learning and studying for anything it is definitely more effective to study over a longer period of time but to also “read it, write it and say it.” I have witnessed first hand how helpful it is on test performance and acquiring knowledge. I, however agree, that a one time test is not representative of one’s knowledge and capabilities.