Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Space»JWST May Have Found the Universe’s First Pristine Galaxy
    Space

    JWST May Have Found the Universe’s First Pristine Galaxy

    By Evan Gough, Universe TodaySeptember 3, 202510 Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Big Bang Early Universe Astrophysics Concept
    The James Webb Space Telescope may have uncovered one of the Universe’s first galaxies, AMORE6, almost devoid of heavy elements. If confirmed, it would be the long-sought evidence for primordial Population III galaxies formed shortly after the Big Bang. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com

    Scientists found AMORE6, a galaxy almost free of heavy elements. Its existence strongly supports key predictions of the Big Bang model.

    Our knowledge of the Universe begins with the Big Bang, the moment when cosmic expansion first began. During this event, a process called Big Bang nucleosynthesis produced only the lightest elements: hydrogen, helium, and trace amounts of lithium. Heavier elements, which astrophysicists refer to as metals, were created later in the hearts of stars that lived and died after this first epoch.

    The earliest generation of stars, known as Population III stars, were the first to forge these heavier elements through stellar nucleosynthesis. These stars themselves contained no metals, or at most extremely small amounts, and their life cycles enriched the Universe with its first metals. Because stars are born in galaxies rather than in isolation, there must also have been Population III galaxies whose stellar populations contained no metals at all.

    JWST Image Showing Numerous Distant Galaxies
    A variety of galaxies are seen in this JWST image. Astronomers are hunting for ancient pristine galaxies that confirm our understanding of the Universe and the Big Bang. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Kristen McQuinn (STScI)

    Despite progress in understanding cosmic history, significant gaps remain. One of the most important missing pieces is evidence for these Population III galaxies. Theory predicts that some early galaxies, observed at high redshifts, should display zero metallicity. Confirming their existence would provide crucial support for our current cosmological framework.

    Surprising results from JWST

    The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has already reshaped expectations by revealing massive, well-developed galaxies far earlier in cosmic history than models had predicted. According to previous understanding, galaxies of that size and maturity should not have appeared so soon after the Big Bang. These discoveries have forced astronomers to reconsider how quickly galaxies formed and evolved.

    Mosaic Image of the Abell 2744 Field
    This figure shows a mosaic image of the Abell 2744 field. The observed position of the AMORE6-A+B system is shown by the yellow square. Credit: Morishita et al. 2025. Nature

    Yet, even with its remarkable capabilities, JWST has not definitively identified a zero-metallicity galaxy. While it has observed galaxies that emerged only a few hundred million years after the Big Bang, none of them have yet shown the complete absence of metals predicted for true Population III systems.

    The role of OIII emissions

    Oxygen plays an essential role in this search. According to cosmological models, the earliest galaxies should contain only hydrogen and helium, with no oxygen or other heavier elements. Astronomers use the OIII emission line in spectroscopy to study galaxies: it reveals ongoing star formation and is especially effective at probing very distant, high-redshift systems. JWST, with its sensitivity, has made these measurements even more powerful.

    In primitive galaxies, strong OIII emissions can indicate very low metallicity. Conversely, weak OIII signals suggest galaxies formed under conditions unlike those seen today. Until recently, no convincing example had been found.

    That may now be changing. New research submitted to Nature reports the possible discovery of a galaxy that fits the criteria for being pristine. The study is led by Takahiro Morishita, a staff scientist at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC) at the California Institute of Technology.

    Graphs Showing Metallicity and Stellar Mass of Galaxies
    The left panel shows the weak OIII emissions for AMORE6. Since it’s observed through a gravitational lens, there are data points for AMORE6 A, AMORE6 B, and AMORE A & B stacked. The x-axis shows a common way of measuring a galaxy’s metallicity by comparing Oxygen with Hydrogen, since Oxygen is the most abundant metal produced by stars. (12+ log (O/H)) The graph also shows other galaxies from the same age range. It’s complicated, but it shows that AMORE6 is more pristine and has very low metallicity compared to the others. Credit: Morishita et al. 2025. Nature

    “The existence of galaxies with no elements such as Oxygen – formed by stars after Big Bang nucleosynthesis – is a key prediction of the cosmological model,” the researchers write. “However, no pristine “zero-metallicity” Population III galaxies have been identified so far.”

    Confirming the Big Bang model

    Until now. Morishita and his co-authors have found a galaxy that fits the description. They detected it at redshift z = 5.725, meaning its light was emitted when the Universe was only about 900 million to 1 billion years old. It’s named AMORE6 and was detected through gravitational lensing. This magnified and duplicated the images of the galaxy, making it easier to observe. The JWST found Hβ emissions, an important line in astronomy used to measure galaxies in different ways, but it didn’t detect any oxygen. That means its metallicity is very low. “The absence of [O iii] immediately indicates that AMORE6 harbors a very low-metallicity, near pristine, interstellar medium,” the authors explain.

    The galaxy also shows low stellar-mass and an extremely compact morphology. “These properties are consistent with massive star formation in a pristine or near-pristine environment,” the authors write. The thing is, this galaxy isn’t as old as some earlier, fully-formed galaxies the JWST found. It’s somewhat puzzling that this strong example of a pristine and low-metallicity star-forming environment was found almost one billion years after the Big Bang.

    More studies will be needed to confirm these findings and understand them in greater detail. But the detection suggests that we are on the right track in understanding Nature.

    “The finding of such an example at a relatively late time in cosmic history is surprising,” the researchers write. “However, regardless of cosmic epoch, the identification of a potentially pristine object is a key validation of the Big Bang model.”

    Reference: “Pristine Massive Star Formation Caught at the Break of Cosmic Dawn” by Takahiro Morishita, Zhaoran Liu, Massimo Stiavelli, Tommaso Treu, Pietro Bergamini and Yechi Zhang, 31 July 2025, arXiv.
    DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10521

    Adapted from an article originally published on Universe Today.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.

    Astrophysics Big Bang Cosmology Galaxy Evolution James Webb Space Telescope Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    NASA’s Webb Telescope Discovers 300 Mysterious Objects That Shouldn’t Exist

    Webb’s Mysterious “Little Red Dots” May Be the Cradle of the First Black Holes

    Earth Could Be in a Massive Cosmic Bubble That’s Warping the Universe, Astrophysicists Reveal

    Webb Telescope Uncovers Bright Ancient Galaxies That Challenge Cosmic Theories

    James Webb Telescope May Have Finally Solved the Crisis in Cosmology

    Witnessing Cosmic Dawn: Webb Captures Birth of Universe’s Earliest Galaxies for First Time

    Galactic Collision Captured in Stunning Detail: NASA’s Webb & Hubble Unite To Create Most Colorful View of Universe

    Galaxy Clusters Unveil New Evidence for Prevailing Theory of Universe

    Unraveling the Universe: Groundbreaking Measurement Shakes Up Physics

    10 Comments

    1. Alvarez on September 3, 2025 2:49 pm

      The discovery of a galaxy with a low metallicty at such an early epoch does not in itself “validate” curent cosmological models. As noted in the article, galaxies have been found at even higher redshift that are more evolved than AMORE6.

      https://scitechdaily.com/when-the-universe-broke-the-rules-webb-spots-impossible-galaxies-at-cosmic-dawn/

      Galaxies that are extremely metal-poor are actually quite rare in the universe, regardless of the epoch, and most of them are dwarfs. AMORE6 may simply have been a “late bloomer”. The starburst galaxy IZwicky18 has a very low metallicity, and yet its redshift is only 0.00258, estimated to be 60 million light years distant, hardly an early epoch.

      Reply
      • danR2222 on September 4, 2025 8:00 am

        This is not a low-metallicity, or ultra-low metallicity, galaxy.

        It is a  z e r o (so far as they have studied it) -metallicity galaxy. And this is one of those occasional semantic differences that do make a difference. It’s like a crime scene where only a picogram of DNA is needed to bring an accused to a conviction. If there is zero DNA, that really matters.

        And this is one of those articles for which skimming will not do. It must be read.

        Reply
        • Alvarez on September 4, 2025 2:08 pm

          There was no “skimming” here. Throughout the article terms like “pristine”, “near pristine”, “very low metallicity”, and ” zero metallicty” are used at various times when AMORE6 is mentioned. Even in the original paper submitted by the researchers the term ‘extremely metal-poor” was used to describe AMORE6 in the very first paragraph. If the interchangeable use of these descriptive terms was good enough for them, it’s good enough for me.

          Reply
      • PhysicsPundit on September 4, 2025 3:35 pm

        Even LLMs have a problem with this: “Population III galaxies are considered to be zero-metallicity, meaning they are almost devoid of heavy elements. This characteristic distinguishes them from later generations of galaxies that contain higher levels of metals produced by previous stars.”

        On Astronomy Stack Exchange, someone posted a good question: Are any Population III stars red dwarfs?
        Answer: Yes, in principle, but while we have indeed found some extremely low-metallicity stars, we have yet to discover zero-metallicity stars. Moreover, accretion of metal-rich gas over billions of years may actually increase a star’s metallicity significantly.

        Reply
    2. Bruce Hochstetler on September 3, 2025 7:36 pm

      You seem to contradict yourself.
      “In primitive galaxies, strong OIII emissions can indicate very low metallicity. Conversely, weak OIII signals suggest galaxies formed under conditions unlike those seen today.”
      Doesn’t this say strong & weak OIII signals BOTH indicate low metals?
      BTW, elsewhere you call oxygen a metal. It’s not.

      Reply
      • danR2222 on September 4, 2025 7:51 am

        In astrophysics, any elements with more protons than H and He are counted as ‘metals’. This has nothing to do with their heat or electrical conductivity or anything else.

        This is one of those astronomy facts that has to be repeated monotonously in articles, because people are always learning it for the first time, for some reason. And the article does in fact allude to it:
        “Heavier elements, which astrophysicists refer to as metals…”

        Reply
      • PhysicsPundit on September 4, 2025 4:04 pm

        A strong OIII signal just indicates active star formation, whereas the “absence of [O iii] immediately indicates that AMORE6 harbors a very low-metallicity, near pristine interstellar medium.”

        Reply
    3. JunggooLee on September 3, 2025 8:36 pm

      B note 2509041234_Source 1.Reinterpreting

      Source 1.
      https://scitechdaily.com/jwst-may-have-found-the-universes-first-pristine-galaxy/

      JWST discovers the first primordial galaxy in the universe
      Evan Gough wrote: Universe Today, September 3, 2025

      1.
      _It is possible that the James Webb Space Telescope has discovered AMORE6, one of the first galaxies in the universe. There are very few heavy elements in this galaxy.

      _If confirmed, this would be the long-awaited evidence for primordial galaxy population III that formed shortly after the Big Bang. (Writer Concept). Photo courtesy of SciTechDaily.com

      _Scientists have discovered AMORE6, a galaxy with few heavy elements. The existence of this galaxy strongly supports key predictions of the Big Bang model.

      【>>>>>

      > The early galaxy is probably sample1.qpeoms.galaxy because it is filled with light elements.

      sample1.
      msbase12.qpeoms.2square.vector
      oms.vix.a’6,vixx.a(b1,g3,k3,o5,n6)
      b0acfd|0000e0
      000ac0|f00bde
      0c0fab|000e0d
      e00d0c|0b0fa0
      f000e0|b0dac0
      d0f000|cae0b0
      0b000f|0ead0c
      0deb00|ac000f
      ced0ba|00f000
      a0b00e|0dc0f0
      0ace00|df000b
      0f00d0|e0bc0a

      >> Then, a black hole vixer in a flat galaxy may also have been created by the inflow of hydrogen or subatoms.

      >> Of course, vixer is a transformant of vixx.neutron_stars.

      >> However, it was recently estimated that it may arise from the path of tsp.nqcell.nqvix.nqms.dark_energy.

      <<<>>
      > In Big Bang cosmology, a large explosion has a one-second banc decay scenario of heavy-mass nk2.msbase.

      >> In the same vein, if there is now a light instantaneous velocity of subatomic (one Googol) superecession, it is almost comparable to the nk2 Big Bang.

      >>Then you’ll be curious about the energy of light tsp particles that speed up like this. That’s nqms.dark_energy. Haha.

      <<<>>>>

      >>A somewhat metallic group Δ A galaxy was born with a small size as shown in Figure 1.msbase4. The type was confirmed by constant analysis to be 672 types.

      View 1.
      04110613
      14051203
      15080902
      01100716

      <<<>>
      > The redshift is in the hot os.vix.ain.main. The main is a small galaxy, like bogey 1.msbase4, away from the observer’s Earth. Hmm.

      > Rather, the cryogenic blue shift of the side approaches the observer. Uh-huh.

      <<>>>

      >> The reason is that the pre-Big Bang universe qpeoms.galaxy.nqms.dark_energy is too huge. Uh-huh.

      > James Webb may not know what the quantum galaxy qpeoms is, even if he sees it. That reveals a problem with the existing Big Bang hypothesis.

      >Because you can’t see nqcell.qms.dark_energy in the pre-Big Bang, Planck universe era, multiverse. Huh.

      <<<】

      3. Check the Big Bang model

      _The galaxy was named AMORE6 and was detected through a gravitational lens. This technique has made observations easier by magnifying and replicating images of galaxies.

      _The JWST discovered the Hβ emission, an important line used in astronomical measurements of galaxies in a variety of ways, but not oxygen. This indicates that the galaxy has a very low metal content

      Reply
    4. John on September 4, 2025 3:29 pm

      The Big problem is that it’s 900 million years after the Big Bang where earlier galaxies don’t exhibit 0 oxygen and o mettalicity and these galaxies were already fully formed around 200 million years after the a big bang

      Reply
    5. Boba on September 5, 2025 4:22 am

      So… what are we gonna do with that galaxy now?

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    JWST May Have Found the Universe’s First Pristine Galaxy

    It’s Snowing Salt. The Strange Phenomenon Happening Deep in the Dead Sea

    Stanford Scientists Successfully Reverse Autism Symptoms in Mice

    Scientists Finally Solve the Mystery of the Sun’s Fastest Particles

    Don’t Throw Away Those Cannabis Leaves – They’re Packed With Rare Compounds

    Why Cancer Spreads: Scientists Uncover a New Clue Inside the Cell’s Power Plant

    These Glow-in-the-Dark Succulents Could Replace Your Night Light

    Mezcal Worm in a Bottle Yields Surprising DNA Results

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Scientists Discover Mysterious Freshwater Reservoir Beneath the Ocean Floor. How Did It Get There?
    • Dinosaur-Hunting Croc Cousin With Monster Jaws Unearthed in Patagonia
    • Blood Vessels Found in T. rex Bones Rewrite What We Know About Dinosaurs
    • This Simple Activity Prevents Chronic Back Pain
    • After 40 Years, Heart Doctors Say Beta Blockers May Do More Harm Than Good
    Copyright © 1998 - 2025 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.