Animal Welfare Experts Demand: Tighten Up Law on Keeping Dangerous Snakes as Pets
The law on keeping dangerous snakes as pets should be tightened up, animal welfare experts demand in this week’s issue of the Vet Record.
The call follows an investigation by the journal, showing that several species of venomous and potentially lethal snakes, such as cobras, vipers, and rattlesnakes, can easily be bought through pet shops in England, but that the licensing arrangements for ownership are somewhat lax.
What’s more, these reptiles are difficult for owners to manage properly at home, and few vets are sufficiently insured or have the relevant expertise to treat them, the investigation reveals.
Under the Dangerous Wild Animals (DWA) Act, it’s perfectly legal to sell venomous snakes to people who don’t have a license to keep them: the legal onus is, instead, on the purchaser to have obtained a DWA license from their local authority.
And animal welfare charity, the RSPCA, says that DWA licenses may sometimes be issued retrospectively by councils, so enabling reptile collectors to obtain venomous snakes before they become licensed.
President of the British Veterinary Zoological Society (BVZS), Peter Kettlewell, points out that there aren’t any legal controls when venomous snakes are purchased in EU countries and brought into the UK either.
“Pet shops are currently excluded from the requirements of the DWA Act and are therefore able to keep dangerous species without a DWA license. BVZS strongly believes the legislation should be changed to prevent this,” he told Vet Record.
But the BVZS is also concerned about the welfare of these animals once in private ownership.
“The husbandry of reptiles is challenging, and even commonly kept reptile species kept in people’s homes are given inadequate care — as shown by the high proportion of reptiles presented to veterinary practices with husbandry-related diseases,” he explains.
“Providing good husbandry would be made more difficult in the case of venomous animals due to the challenges in handling and managing them safely,” he adds.
“BVZS believes that both the keeping of dangerous species by private individuals is likely to compromise both animal welfare and human safety, and as such, the selling of such species to private individuals should be carefully regulated and restricted,” he contends.
The RSPCA also told Vet Record that it is “deeply concerned” about the number of venomous snakes being kept as pets, describing the DWA Act as “weakly drafted and poorly enforced.” Many owners either don’t bother to get a license or don’t realize they need one, it says.
Vet Record asked several exotics vets whether they would be prepared to deal with venomous snakes. Many said they wouldn’t, citing health and safety issues and a lack of access to antivenom.
In a linked editorial, Vet Record senior news reporter, Josh Loeb, explains that the UK government (Defra) has now concluded a public consultation on the welfare of pet primates, and looks set to ban the keeping of these animals as pets.
“If written into law, such a ban would set a precedent. For the first time the UK would be banning a species or group of species from being kept as pets primarily because of welfare concerns. There are currently some legal restrictions on keeping certain species in private households — however, existing laws are based primarily on public safety or conservation reasons, not welfare grounds,” he writes.
Given the risks and welfare issues involved, he questions whether venomous snakes shouldn’t be included in this ban.
Such a move would be pushing at an open door, he suggests, as there’s cross-party agreement on the principle that certain types of wild animals just aren’t suitable as pets.
There may also be a sound public health reason for reviewing regulations around the exotic animal trade, in view of the source of the current Covid-19 pandemic, he argues.
“If we want fewer exotic diseases to be imported into the UK going forward, perhaps we should rethink the keeping of exotic pets,” he writes.
“When the current Covid-19 crises pass and when, hopefully, the government gains more headspace, the issue of dangerous and exotic wild animals being stocked as pets is surely an issue that merits greater political attention,” he concludes.
References:
“Investigation: Dangerous snake laws need constricting” 19 March 2020, Vet Record.
DOI: 10.1136/vr.m3001
“Editorial: Keeping dangerous pets” by Josh Loeb, 19 March 2020, Vet Record.
DOI: 10.1136/vr.m3000
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
2 Comments
First pictured, Boiga Dendrophila, is rear fanged. About as harmless as this article.
Glad to hear someone else acknowledge the fact that far too many reptiles cannot humanely be kept in captivity and are let go far from where their survival is the last thing on the mind.I have seen many outdoors that obviously came from inner breeding or pet stores and kept as drug paraphernalia.Their sale should be forbidden period.I hope you follow through with a law prohibiting the sale or ownership of any species of anything notin it’s native state. Snakes outside of their God given environment are frightened hungered and too cold.They assume they are in vicinity of what is theirs and try to stay alive.I read that their last resort is to bite and don’t go out of their way to do so and they have to deal with the injustice of captivity which involves dealing with humans which most do not naturally stay in close proximity.They should also have vegan diets if they have to be kept indoors for rehab or grave injury.