Scientists created a packaging solution that reduces mercury in canned tuna by up to 35%, making fish consumption safer.
Fish is an excellent source of high-quality protein, rich in omega-3 fatty acids and other essential nutrients. However, some fish, particularly tuna, are prone to accumulating toxic mercury, making their consumption a health concern.
Researchers from Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden have developed an innovative method to reduce mercury levels in canned tuna. By packaging the tuna in a water-based solution containing the amino acid cysteine, they were able to remove up to 35% of the accumulated mercury, significantly lowering human exposure to this toxic element.
While fish and other seafood provide essential nutrients, they can also expose consumers to methylmercury, the most hazardous form of mercury. This toxic compound binds to proteins in fish tissue and accumulates in species higher up the food chain, such as tuna, posing potential health risks.
Packaging solution draws out the mercury
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), mercury is one of the ten most harmful chemicals for humans. Exposure can damage the central nervous system, with fetuses and young children being particularly sensitive to the effects. That is why dietary recommendations for pregnant women advise caution with tuna consumption.
“Our study shows that there are alternative approaches to addressing mercury contamination in tuna, rather than just limiting consumption. Our goal is to improve food safety and contribute to enhanced human health, as well as to better utilize food that is currently under certain restrictions,” says Mehdi Abdollahi, Associate Professor at the Department of Life Sciences at Chalmers and coordinator of a project called Detoxpak.
The concept of so-called active packaging is to develop materials, for example, a liquid inside a can, that interact with food during storage − for instance, to increase the shelf life. However, this concept has never previously been used to improve food safety.
In a previous study, the researchers investigated the possibility of coating packages with thiolated silica to capture mercury from canned fish. What they observed, was that the forces binding the mercury within the tuna tissue prevented it from being released.
Proteins in tuna tissues, particularly sulfur-containing amino acids, strongly bind and accumulate mercury due to the strong interactions involving thiol groups from these amino acids.
“By knowing that, we decided to add one of them, cysteine, to a water solution in which fish meat can be immersed. We believed this would allow some of the mercury to be drawn out and instead bind to the solution and be discarded. Further research is needed to take care of the removed mercury,” says Przemysław Strachowski, first author, and at the time of study, a postdoc at the Department of Life Sciences at Chalmers.
Up to 35 percent of mercury removed
In the study, the researchers discovered that the greater the surface area of fish flesh in contact with the cysteine solution, the higher the mercury uptake. The highest value of mercury reduction, 35 percent, was reached when testing canned minced tuna, from regular grocery stores. They also discovered a maximum threshold of two weeks, after which no further changes occurred.
In the current study, however, the researchers did not observe any noticeable changes in the appearance or smell of the tested fish samples. Cell-based assays have also proven the safety of the developed technology.
“The beauty of this type of packaging is that it is active while the product is on the shelf. No additional production steps would be needed if a method like this were used industrially. The application of our results could increase the safety margin for fish consumption,” says Przemysław Strachowski.
More about the method:
- In the study, fish protein extracts in the form of dry powder, fresh and lab-steamed fish in fillet and mince forms, and commercially available samples of canned tuna, both in larger pieces and as minced fish, were used.
- No extra additives, like pH modifiers, were needed for this process. Only the cysteine concentration was adjusted in the water. Increasing cysteine levels improved mercury removal, but only up to a certain point. A 1.2 percent concentration level was optimal.
Reference: “New Insight into Mercury Removal from Fish Meat Using a Single-Component Solution Containing cysteine” by Przemysław Strachowski, Geeta Mandava, Johan Lundqvist, Romain Bordes and Mehdi Abdollahi, 2 October 2024,
Global Challenges.
DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202400161
Funding: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
7 Comments
Nobody’s gonna care because it will raise the cost of packaging… and ruin the taste at same time.
Have you tasted it?
Will cysteine remove mercury from coal ash?
“We believed this would allow some of the mercury to be drawn out and instead bind to the solution and be discarded.”
Discarded how and where?
Think about this process before packaging. If done by the fish producers,the mercury could be more effectively disposed of in an industrial setting. The reclaimed mercury may even have a value to other users. My dogs love the tuna water on their food. I don’t want to increase their intake of mercury! Also, like almost everyone else, I do not have a facility to handle mercury in my home.
Typically, open cooking of fish removes much of the methylmercury because it is volatile, having a boiling point the same as water.
However, my understanding is that tuna and salmon are usually cooked in industrial steam pressure-cookers and immediately canned to maintain sterility. Thus, it doesn’t have an opportunity to release the mercury. Perhaps the cooking process could be modified to continually replace the steam with fresh, uncontaminated steam with an open system rather than a closed system.
As God is my witness, I’ll never eat tuna again.