Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Biology»House Cats Have a Much Larger Impact on Wildlife Than Wild Predators
    Biology

    House Cats Have a Much Larger Impact on Wildlife Than Wild Predators

    By North Carolina State UniversityMarch 11, 20203 Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Tracking Domestic Cats
    Domestic cats can have big effects on local wildlife, according to a citizen-science project that tracked house cats and counted their prey. Credit: Roland Kays

    Keeping Cats Indoors Could Mitigate Adverse Effects to Wildlife

    Birds alighting on driveways and baby bunnies munching on lawn grass should keep something in mind: Beware the house cat.

    A new study shows that hunting by house cats can have big effects on local animal populations because they kill more prey, in a given area, than similar-sized wild predators. This effect is mostly concentrated relatively close to a pet cat’s home, since most of their movement was a 100-meter radius of their homes, usually encompassing a few of their neighborhood’s yards on either side.

    Researchers from NC State University and the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences collaborated with scientists and citizen scientists from six countries to collect GPS cat-tracking data and prey-capture reports from 925 pet cats, with most coming from the U.S., U.K, Australia and New Zealand.

    “Since they are fed cat food, pets kill fewer prey per day then wild predators, but their home ranges were so small that this effect on local prey ends up getting really concentrated,” said Roland Kays, the paper’s lead author. “Add to this the unnaturally high density of pet cats in some areas, and the risk to bird and small mammal population gets even worse.

    “We found that house cats have a two- to 10-time larger impact on wildlife than wild predators — a striking effect,” he said.

    The researchers focused on the ecological impact of house cats — as opposed to feral cats — and enlisted hundreds of pet owners to track their cats to see where they went and report on the number of dead critters they brought home. Inexpensive GPS tracking devices measured distances traveled by these house cats, which spent their days both indoors and outdoors.

    “We knew cats were killing lots of animals — some estimates show that cats in North America kill from 10 to 30 billion wildlife animals per year — but we didn’t know the area in which that was happening, or how this compared with what we see in nature,” Kays said.

    The researchers calculated the amount of prey killed per year by house cats and divided the number by the area in which the cats hunted. Some adjustments were made to the prey count as cats don’t necessarily bring all their kills home.

    The study showed that house cats killed an average of 14.2 to 38.9 prey per 100 acres, or hectare, per year.

    The study also showed that cats do much of their damage to wildlife in disturbed habitats, like housing developments.

    “Because the negative impact of cats is so local, we create a situation in which the positive aspects of wildlife, be they the songs of birds or the beneficial effects of lizards on pests, are least common where we would appreciate them most,” said study co-author Rob Dunn, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor of Applied Ecology at NC State. “Humans find joy in biodiversity, but we have, by letting cats go outdoors, unwittingly engineered a world in which such joys are ever harder to experience.”

    Reference: “The small home ranges and large local ecological impacts of pet cats” by Roland Kays, Robert R. Dunn, Arielle W. Parsons and Brandon Mcdonald, North Carolina State University; Troi Perkins, Dartmouth College; Shelby Powers, East Carolina University; Leonora Shell, SciStarter; Jenni L. McDonald and Holly Cole, University of Exeter; Heidy Kikillus and Lisa Woods, Victoria University of Wellington; Hayley Tindle and Philip Roetman, University of South Australia, 11 March 2020, Animal Conservation.
    DOI: 10.1111/acv.12563

    NC State’s Arielle W. Parsons and Brandon Mcdonald co-authored the paper. Other co-authors include Troi Perkins from Dartmouth College; Shelby Powers from East Carolina University; Leonora Shell from SciStarter; Jenni L. McDonald and Holly Cole from University of Exeter; Heidy Kikillus and Lisa Woods from Victoria University of Wellington; and Hayley Tindle and Philip Roetman from the University of South Australia.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Cats Ecology Environment North Carolina State University Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    “An Extremely Violent Global Pandemic” – Mysterious Disease Wipes Out Sea Urchins Worldwide

    Researchers Discover Cryptic Cat Species on Mount Everest

    Despite Nuclear Accident Animal Life Is Thriving Around Fukushima

    Marine Reserves Enhance Resilience to Climatic Impacts & Aid in Ecosystem Recovery

    First Direct Observation of an Under-Ice Algal Bloom in the Arctic

    Increased Number of Plant Species Responding to Global Warming

    Ecologists Document Changes in Fragile Land-Sea Ecological Chain

    Marine Worm Thrives on Steady Diet of Deadly Poisons

    Scientists Reconstruct Ancient Permian Ecosystem from Ash-Covered Plants

    3 Comments

    1. JC on March 17, 2020 7:03 am

      If the neighborhood and cats weren’t there, how many bobcats, foxes, owls, etc., would be there? How much would they eat?

      Reply
    2. Clyde Spencer on June 27, 2020 6:43 am

      “We found that house cats have a two- to 10-time larger impact on wildlife than wild predators — a striking effect,”

      How was that determined without inventorying the local predators and their kills? If humans have eliminated or reduced the natural predator populations, which is usually the case, do not cats fill the ecological niche vacated by the wild predators?

      Reply
    3. Olivier Ducret on August 30, 2021 12:33 pm

      What about us, domestic humans?

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New Study Reveals Why Ozempic Works Better for Some People Than Others

    Climate Change Is Altering a Key Greenhouse Gas in a Way Scientists Didn’t Expect

    New Study Suggests Gravitational Waves May Have Created Dark Matter

    Scientists Discover Why the Brain Gets Stuck in Schizophrenia

    Scientists Engineer “Tumor-Eating” Bacteria That Devour Cancer From Within

    Even “Failed” Diets May Deliver Long-Term Health Gains, Study Finds

    NIH Scientists Discover Powerful New Opioid That Relieves Pain Without Dangerous Side Effects

    Collapsing Plasma May Hold the Key to Cosmic Magnetism

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • This 15,000-Year-Old Discovery Changes What We Know About Early Human Creativity
    • 35-Million-Year-Old Mystery: Strange Arachnid Discovered Preserved in Amber
    • Revolutionary Gas Turbine Generates Power Without Air Compression
    • Is AI Really Just a Tool? It Could Be Altering How You See Reality
    • JWST Reveals a “Forbidden” Planet With a Baffling Composition
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.