Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Earth»How to Save Billions of Gallons of Water: Replace Coal With Gas or Renewables
    Earth

    How to Save Billions of Gallons of Water: Replace Coal With Gas or Renewables

    By Duke UniversityOctober 22, 20191 Comment4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Coal Fired Power Plant in Florida
    Switching from coal to natural gas and renewables for electricity generation could save at least 12,000 billion gallons of water a year by 2030, a Duke University study finds.

    Switch to natural gas would save 12,000 billion gallons a year by 2030; switching to solar or wind power would yield even greater savings.

    The ongoing transition from coal to natural gas and renewables in the U.S. electricity sector is dramatically reducing the industry’s water use, a new Duke University study finds.

    “While most attention has been focused on the climate and air quality benefits of switching from coal, this new study shows that the transition to natural gas – and even more so, to renewable energy sources – has resulted in saving billions of gallons of water,” said Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment.  

    These savings in both water consumption and water withdrawal have come despite the intensification of water use associated with fracking and shale gas production, the new study shows.  

    “For every megawatt of electricity produced using natural gas instead of coal, the amount of water withdrawn from local rivers and groundwater is reduced by 10,500 gallons (40 cubic meters), the equivalent of a 100-day water supply for a typical American household,” said Andrew Kondash, a postdoctoral researcher at Duke, who led the study as part of his doctoral dissertation under Vengosh.

    Water consumption – the amount of water used by a power plant and never returned to the environment – drops by 260 gallons (1 cubic meter) per megawatt, he said.  

    At these rates of reduction, if the rise of shale gas as an energy source and the decline of coal continues through the next decade, by 2030 about 483 billion cubic meters (127,600 billion gallons) of water will be saved each year, the Duke study predicts.

    If all coal-fired power plants are converted to natural gas, the annual water savings will reach 12,250 billion gallons (46 billion cubic meters) – that’s 260% of current annual U.S. industrial water use.

    Although the magnitude of water used for coal mining and fracking is similar, cooling systems in natural gas power plants use much less water in general than those in coal plants. That can quickly add up to substantial savings, since 40% of all water use in the United States currently goes to cooling thermoelectric plants, Vengosh noted.

    “The amount of water used for cooling thermoelectric plants eclipses all its other uses in the electricity sector, including for coal mining, coal washing, ore, and gas transportation, drilling, and fracking,” he said.

    Even further savings could be realized by switching to solar or wind energy. The new study shows that the water intensity of these renewable energy sources, as measured by water use per kilowatt of electricity, is only 1% to 2% of coal or natural gas’s water intensity.

    “Switching to solar or wind energy would eliminate much of the water withdrawals and water consumption for electricity generation in the U.S.,” Vengosh said.

    Natural gas overtook coal as the primary fossil fuel for electricity generation in the United States in 2015, mainly due to the rise of unconventional shale gas exploration. In 2018, 35.1% of U.S. electricity came from natural gas, while 27.4% came from coal, 6.5% came from wind energy, and 2.3% came from solar energy, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

    They published their peer-reviewed paper on October 14, 2019, in the open-access journal Environmental Research Letters.

    Reference: “Quantification of the Water-Use Reduction Associated with the Transition from Coal to Natural Gas in the U.S. Electricity Sector” by Andrew J. Kondash, Dalia Patiño-Echeverri and Avner Vengosh, 14 October 2019, Environmental Research Letters.
    DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4d71

    Dalia Patiño-Echeverri, Gendell Associate Professor of Energy Systems at Duke’s Nicholas School, co-authored the study with Kondash and Vengosh.

    Funding for the study came from a National Science Foundation grant (#EAR-1441497) and the Duke University Energy Initiative.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Duke University Energy Green Energy Popular Water
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Harnessing Hellfire: The Geothermal Breakthrough Set to Transform Clean Energy

    Miles Beneath Our Feet: The Superhot Energy Source That Could Change Everything

    Environmental Scientists Want to Extract Carbon-Neutral “Biofuel” From Lakes

    Seasonal Pumped Hydropower Storage Could Solve the Renewable Energy Storage Challenge

    California’s Switch to Solar, Wind Energy Preserves Groundwater for Drought, Agriculture

    New Aluminum Batteries Increase the Range of UUVs Tenfold

    Floating Nuclear Power Plant that is Safer and Cheaper

    GRACE Reveals That a Third of Big Groundwater Basins Are in Distress

    Earth’s Water Supply Summed Up in One “Tiny” Bubble

    1 Comment

    1. Clyde Spencer on March 25, 2021 8:18 am

      Cooling water is typically returned to its source, such as a river, with FAR less impact than water used for fracking. Not using cooling water isn’t ‘saving’ it! Water isn’t destroyed unless it is used in the electrolytic production of hydrogen. On the other hand, fracking water is problematic with respect to its usability after being contaminated by chemicals.

      This article reads as though these researchers either haven’t thought this through, or they have an agenda.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Scientists May Have Found the Key to Jupiter and Saturn’s Moon Mystery

    Scientists Uncover Brain Changes That Link Pain to Depression

    Saunas May Do More Than Raise Body Temperature – They Activate Your Immune System

    Exercise in a Pill? Metformin Shows Surprising Effects in Cancer Patients

    Hidden Oceans of Magma Could Be Protecting Alien Life

    New Study Challenges Alzheimer’s Theories: It’s Not Just About Plaques

    Artificial Sweeteners May Harm Future Generations, Study Suggests

    Splashdown! NASA Artemis II Returns From Record-Breaking Moon Mission

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Ancient DNA Reveals Irish Goats Have a 3,000-Year-Old Lineage Still Alive Today
    • Historians Reveal Secrets of the Strange Hat Wars That Shook Early Modern England
    • “A Plague Is Upon Us”: The Mass Death That Changed an Ancient City Forever
    • This Strange Material Can Turn Superconductivity on and off Like a Switch
    • Scientists Discover Game-Changing New Way To Treat High Cholesterol
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.