New Research Links Red Meat Consumption to a 22% Higher Risk of Heart Disease

Heart Disease Concept

The study also found that consuming fish, poultry, and eggs was not associated with heart disease.

Blood sugar, general inflammation, and microbiome-related metabolites like TMAO seem to be more crucial in regulating heart disease risk than blood pressure or cholesterol levels.

Is there a link between consuming more meat, particularly red and processed meat, and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease? If so, why? The effects of foods derived from animals on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are hotly contested despite extensive research, and the mechanisms behind any possible impacts of animal proteins are still unknown. Understanding the effects of meat consumption is crucial for older adults since they are most at risk for heart disease and may benefit from consuming protein to counteract the deterioration of muscle mass and strength that comes with aging.

The link between heart disease and saturated fat, dietary cholesterol, sodium, nitrites, and even high-temperature cooking has been studied by scientists over the years, but the evidence for many of these mechanisms has not been strong. Recent data points to specific metabolites produced by our gut bacteria when we consume meat as the potential underlying culprits.

A recent study headed by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute and the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University quantifies the risk of ASCVD associated with meat consumption and identifies underlying biologic pathways that may explain this risk. The study of over 4,000 men and women over the age of 65 in the United States found that greater meat intake is associated with an increased risk of ASCVD—22 percent higher risk for every 1.1 serving per day—and that increased levels of three metabolites generated by gut bacteria from nutrients prevalent in meat explain roughly 10% of this increased risk. Red meat was associated with a higher risk and interconnections with gut bacterial metabolites, however, this was not found for poultry, eggs, or fish.

The research, which was recently published in the journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, is the first to examine the connections between animal source foods and the risk of ASCVD events, and the mediation of this risk by gut microbiota-generated compounds as well as by traditional ASCVD risk pathways such as blood cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar.

The research drew on years of data from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a long-term observational study of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Americans aged 65 and older. Several blood biomarkers were measured at baseline and again during follow-up, including levels of the gut-microbiome generated trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and two of its key intermediates, gamma-butyrobetaine, and crotonobetaine, derived from L-carnitine, abundant in red meat.


  • In this community-based cohort of older U.S. men and women, higher intakes of unprocessed red meat, total meat (unprocessed red meat plus processed meat), and total animal source foods were prospectively associated with a higher incidence of ASCVD during a median follow-up of 12.5 years.
  • The positive associations with ASCVD were partly mediated (8-11 percent of excess risk) by plasma levels of TMAO, gamma-butyrobetaine, and crotonobetaine.
  • The higher risk of ASCVD associated with meat intake was also partially mediated by levels of blood glucose and insulin and, for processed meats, by systematic inflammation but not by blood pressure or blood cholesterol levels.
  • Intakes of fish, poultry, and eggs were not significantly associated with ASCVD.

These findings help answer long-standing questions on mechanisms linking meats to the risk of cardiovascular diseases,” said the paper’s co-first author Meng Wang, a post-doctoral fellow at the Friedman School. “The interactions between red meat, our gut microbiome, and the bioactive metabolites they generate seem to be an important pathway for risk, which creates a new target for possible interventions to reduce heart disease.”

The 3,931 study subjects were followed for a median of 12.5 years, and their average age at baseline was 73. The study adjusted for established risk factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, physical activity, other dietary habits, and many additional risk factors.

“Interestingly, we identified three major pathways that help explain the links between red and processed meat and cardiovascular disease—microbiome-related metabolites like TMAO, blood glucose levels, and general inflammation—and each of these appeared more important than pathways related to blood cholesterol or blood pressure,” said co-senior author, Dariush Mozaffarian, dean for policy at the Friedman School. “This suggests that, when choosing animal-source foods, it’s less important to focus on differences in total fat, saturated fat, or cholesterol, and more important to better understand the health effects of other components in these foods, like L-carnitine and heme iron.”

By leveraging extensive clinical and dietary data among a large elderly community, the research “links the gut microbial TMAO pathway to animal source foods and heightened atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks,” said co-senior author Stanley L. Hazen, section head of preventive cardiology and rehabilitation at Cleveland Clinic. “The study also argues for dietary efforts as a means of reducing that risk, since dietary interventions can significantly lower TMAO.”

More study is needed to determine if the findings are generalizable across ages and nationalities. The authors also noted that while microbiome biomarkers were directly measured in the blood, study participants’ dietary habits were self-reported, and study findings are observational and cannot prove cause-and-effect.

Ahmed Hasan, a medical officer and program director in the Atherothrombosis & Coronary Artery Disease Branch at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, part of the NIH, agrees. “While more studies are needed, the current reports provide a potential new target for preventing or treating heart disease in a subgroup of people who consume excessive amounts of red meat,” said Hasan, who was not a part of the study.

For now, consumers are encouraged to follow current recommendations for a heart-healthy lifestyle, including adopting a healthy diet that is rich in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and other heart-healthy foods, NHLBI’s Hasan said. Other heart-healthy lifestyle changes also include aiming for a healthy weight, managing stress, managing blood pressure, getting more exercise, getting adequate sleep, and quitting smoking, he added.

Higher Levels of TMAO, Related Metabolites Linked to Higher Risk of Death

The ATVB study is part of an ongoing collaboration among scientists at the Friedman School and Cleveland Clinic to uncover the role that the gut microbiome plays in human health, especially cardiovascular health. In a paper in JAMA Network Open in May, many of the same researchers reported that TMAO and related metabolites in older adults are positively associated with a higher risk of death whether deaths were related to cardiovascular disease or another disease. Participants with the highest levels of plasma TMAO and its biomarkers had a 20 to 30 percent higher risk of death than those with the lowest levels.

This study included more than 5,000 participants from the CHS. Findings were notable because there have been few studies on TMAO and the risk of death in the general population; previous research typically looked at clinical patients with underlying conditions such as diabetes, kidney disease, and heart disease. While identified risk factors are concerning, the good news is that TMAO levels are potentially modifiable. “Now that we know more about the severity of risks associated with TMAO, we can explore effective approaches to change these levels in the body,” said the paper’s co-first author, Amanda Fretts of the University of Washington Department of Epidemiology.

References: “Dietary Meat, Trimethylamine N-Oxide-Related Metabolites, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study” by Meng Wang, Zeneng Wang, Yujin Lee, Heidi T.M. Lai, Marcia C. de Oliveira Otto, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Amanda Fretts, Nona Sotoodehnia, Matthew Budoff, Joseph A. DiDonato, Barbara McKnight, W.H. Wilson Tang, Bruce M. Psaty, David S. Siscovick, Stanley L. Hazen and Dariush Mozaffarian, 1 August 2022, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.316533

“Association of Trimethylamine N-Oxide and Metabolites With Mortality in Older Adults” by Amanda M. Fretts, Ph.D., MPH, Stanley L. Hazen, MD, Ph.D., Paul Jensen, Ph.D., MPH, Matthew Budoff, MD, Colleen M. Sitlani, Ph.D., Meng Wang, Ph.D., Marcia C. de Oliveira Otto, Ph.D., Joseph A. DiDonato, Ph.D., Yujin Lee, Ph.D., Bruce M. Psaty, MD, Ph.D., David S. Siscovick, MD, MPH, Nona Sotoodehnia, MD, MPH, W. H. Wilson Tang, MD, Heidi Lai, Ph.D., Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Ph.D., MPH and Dariush Mozaffarian, MD, Ph.D., 20  May 2022, JAMA Network Open.
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13242

The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 

Both the ATVB and JAMA Network Open studies support the importance of the microbiome and specific metabolites to human health, with the ATVB paper specifically linking the gut microbiome with meat intake, and impacts on heart health.

5 Comments on "New Research Links Red Meat Consumption to a 22% Higher Risk of Heart Disease"

  1. Eat more chicken! Nice hit piece you f*@king shill.

  2. Humans have only been eating red meat since we’ve been on the planet.
    I hate the propaganda disguised as science pieces.
    You do realize your average reader is not also watching “The View”
    F’ing morons.

  3. Charles G. Shaver | September 29, 2022 at 8:23 am | Reply

    There’s an old saying that ‘a word to the wise should be sufficient’ but, as a lay victim, investigator and discoverer, I’ve been writing thousands of professionals (beginning with the FDA [with replies] in October of 2005) of my findings on my kind of food allergies and multiple kinds of FDA approved food poisoning that are consistent with multiple epidemics of chronic diseases in the US since 1979. Ineligible for any of the now $Trillions of taxpayer grant dollars misspent on drug and genetic research I can only postulate on why red meat (especially if adulterated with FDA approved toxic additives) is more risky than other good sources of animal protein; it takes longer to digest and metabolize and, therefore, to end the allergy reactions (e.g. inflammation, minimally) in those allergic to it. My experience suggests to me a new ‘old saying:’ like horses to water, ‘you can bring an academic to wisdom but you can’t make him/her think.’

  4. “New Research Links Red Meat Consumption to a 22% Higher Risk of Heart Disease”

    The phrase, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” was popularized by Carl Sagan. I would consider the quoted claim as being “extraordinary” considering that humans and their progenitors evolved eating meat, as evidenced by our dentition and the spoils recovered by archaeologists from ancient campsites. There is evidence that meat provided us with the extra calories needed to thrive, especially before the invention of pottery and metallurgy provided us the means to even utilize many vegetables that require cooking to be palatable and nutritious.

  5. The premise of this research that consumption of red meat is associated with atherscelorosis primarily due to the production of TMAO from L-carnitine and choline by gut bacteria is a red herring. Let’s start with L-carnitine and choline, both of these compounds have critical functions in human health in multiple systems from the brain to the skeletal muscle to mitochondrial function. To suggest that either of these compounds is responsible for atherosclerosis seems highly unlikely and would require a significant burden of evidence which cannot be provided by an epidemiological study like this one. Furthermore plenty of evidence exists to suggest that supplementing with these nutrients is beneficial to health. Even though much of this evidence come from smaller studies the biochemistry seems to suggest that there is some truth to the benefits. Furthermore TMAO is found in much higher levels in fish and that spikes blood TMAO after consumption, much more so than red meat. Yet fish are considered heart healthy. The article fails to account for confounding factors such as perhaps the gut bacteria that produce TMAO from red meat may also produce other undiscovered byproducts that could be increasing the risk of atherosclerosis in some patients. The fact that high blood pressure and atherscelorosis were not found to be associated seems highly unlikely and requires further investigation, since plenty of literature to the contrary exists. I have not yet read the paper and I can’t comment directly on the science but this article is poorly written and it’s conclusions are unreliable and possibly very wrong. I am not convinced that red meat, carnitine, and TMAO are culprits in atherosclerosis.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.